this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
206 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 139 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That, by itself, should be cause to remove the Texas Lt. Gov from office. He's literally committing sedition and violating his oath of office.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m sure Texas will get right on that, just as soon as they’ve removed accused felon Ken Paxton from office.

[–] Rhinopotamus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I recognize this is not the point of the post, but an accused felon doesn’t really make sense, since a felon is someone who is formally tried and convicted of a felonious crime.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 131 points 10 months ago

Ok, go to court and do it, or shut the fuck up.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 107 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They're like five year olds...

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most five year olds are far better behaved.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 2 points 10 months ago

The ones that have faced consequences for their actions, sure.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I see what you did there

[–] ARk@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 76 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If he had any real reason to do so, it would be fine. Their problem is that "retalitation" is not a valid reason according to A14.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Radio hosts are saying failure to secure our border is an insurrection. I wish I was making it up.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

That's just because they don't understand words with more than three syllables.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The right wingers are truly dumber than dirt, so I'm sure the base eat that nonsense right TF up.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 51 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Can a governor do that, though? From my limited knowledge of US political structure, a governor is part of the executive branch, and overruling electoral process can only be done my the judicial branch.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 58 points 10 months ago

NAL, but almost certainly not. Governors don't get to decide who gets to appear on a ballot. Trump got removed, because he was found to have participated in an insurrection, a clear violation of the 14th Amendment.

If they want to remove Biden, they'll have to prove he did something disqualifying.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Lieutenant Governor. But .. still no.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Somehow shitheels always find a way to be shit, I'm afraid.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

The Republican party is a criminal conspiracy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Based on what? Donnie stoked an insurrection and plotted a coup. He's a criminal.

What did Biden do?

[–] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're trying to water down the word "insurrection" as hard as they can so they can invoke the 14th. They haven't really thought it through much more than that, much like the current impeachment discussions.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They have been bleating for nearly three years now how "it wasn't really an insurrection", and I suppose that has not worked well, because most people continue to ignore them and their nonsense narratives about that. Now they are going to downplay the very term itself. Makes a certain kind of sense.

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Loves his son, flaws and all

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Yep, the Republicans know the password to get the presidency. Hunter2

[–] ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

This is going to lead to a civil war. The Republicans simply cannot accept any consequences for their actions, or any failure of their insane message to win a majority vote, so they resort to insurrection.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He can’t. Like all conservatives in politics- he knows nothing about the laws he swore to uphold.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a large swath of dumbassery in the current congress, especially the house and especially since maga, but don't make the mistake of thinking that all cons are dumb. Tons of the senators are lawyers. They aren't ignorant of the law, they're evil people using the law to line their pockets and make the world a worse place. Turtle McConnell couldn't have been grifting in politics for 137 years if he was stupid.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Trump is in politics and worshipped and protected by these people and he’s a complete buffoon. They’re idiots. Period.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So your argument is that bc one stupid populist got elected, none of the evil shit conservatives do is done intelligently?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If a person supports an idiot as a leader, they’re clearly not a smart person. So you can follow this simple rule:

It takes an idiot to elect an idiot.

[–] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Generalisations never hold up with even the most cursory of critiques.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

States actually have quite a lot of control of who to put on their ballots. The prelude to the First Civil War had quite a lot of slaving garbage states, like Texas, only state to fight a war for slavery twice, not carrying Lincoln on the ballots, for example.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1860_United_States_presidential_election_in_Texas

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

So let me get this straight:

Colorado had to go through legal challenges and courts to remove a twice impeached rapist that’s hell bent on turning America into his own personal bank, but Texas can just remove people at will?

load more comments
view more: next ›