this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
54 points (84.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26916 readers
1656 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems like France stands out among terrorist attacks in the news. Is it because they are more likely to be critical of Muslim culture than other European nations? Is it because there is a security failure allowing terrorist to come in and organize better?

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 79 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

France certainly has a social problem, with immigrant-descended populations often living precariously in crime-ridden banlieues, relatively isolated from the "indigenous" French people. These are great conditions to breed extremism.

But I'm not sure you could go so far as to say that there's really a terrorism problem. Of course any terrorist attack will be a huge thing in the news, but looking at the bigger picture, it still happens rather rarely and France is overall a pretty safe country.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is an accurate summary of the situation. We have a social problem, and a pretty bad one at that, not a terrorism or an immigration problem.

[–] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We’re in the endgame of capitalism and fascism, baby.

Best to just keep your head down, vote left (like spitting on a forest fire), and most importantly, stay armed and practice your marksmanship.

It’s going to be a shit future.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are less terrorist attacks in France than mass shootings in the USA, per year, per capita.

So, no, it doesn't have a problem.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"It has less X than the US has shootings" means almost nothing as a statement. Thats not a metric for if its a problem or not

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

But it does allow for a statement to be quantified and compared. So now on to the most dehumanising post I've ever written...

Current French population is 65 million, and USA is 340 million. So USA is 5.23x larger.

Since 2000, 292 people in France have been killed due to terrorist acts, according to this handy Wikipedia page. 90 of which were at the Bataclan, with 131 people being killed that weekend in the most deadly terrorist attack in French history.

That gives the equivalent of 1,527 people, over nearly 24 years, or about 64 people a year.

According to the Gun Violence Archive, in the USA 2,006 people - excluding perpetrators - have been killed...since 1st January, 2021, giving a staggering 668 people per year.

(I would go back further, but unfortunately their data export appears to max out at 2000 incidents.)

So, regardless of your thoughts or feelings about gun violence in America, France's "terrorist problem" - including the worst attack they have ever faced - is less than a tenth of that.

Does this excuse or justify any of the cowardly fucks who killed innocent people? No, of course not. Fuck them all.

But it does highlight the size, and I hope gives people a reason to pause and think about just who is peddling the line, and just who seeks to benefit from demonising overwhelmingly peaceful minority groups.

It's almost like white nationalism is the bigger threat. Funny that.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Alright, the real reason why you see terrorism in France more than others, is from what we in Denmark call the Muhammad Crisis.

A Danish satire drawing of Muhammad with a bomb was published in a Danish newspaper. The papers HQ got attacked. A small one, but still significant in Denmark.

France newspaper L'Equipe then reprinted the drawing more than once as a protest for free speech. After that France became a prime target for these kind of terrorists.

The driving terrorism in Nice, bombings in Paris and at L'Equipes HQ, it all happened after that.

This created alot of bad blood between these cultures, and that long going hate is what keeps France a prime target.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To blame the terrorist attacks France has suffered on a cartoon by a niche newspaper is a rather blinded look at the situation, and ignores pretty much everything about the state of the world in the past few hundred years as well as modern times.

I hope no one walks away thinking this comment is correct.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I hope no one thinks this is the whole explanation, but it's part of history that is not known by many.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It's a tiny part that doesn't have much relevance today. And it's not a hidden history it was big news for years.

[–] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

I totally agree with you on this. I can somehow sense that the law against Islamic practitioners has been tightened more and more, e.g. regarding hijab, after that. It's like if you cant be us, you can no longer be tolerated; you're not one of us.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

L'équipe ? The sport journal read by football circle jerkers ?

You probably meant Charly Hebdo.

And France is a though subject, it is historically a welcoming country for northern Africa and Muslim population (former protectorat or colonies, same language) but France partly failed mixing its population with the boom of huge ugly suburbs in the 60/70s. They ended up being poor class zone, that became foreigners zones, that became forgotten by politics leading to their population growing poorer and angry (with a right to be). Some of those were targeted by extremism advocate as they make a good place to cultivate anger and recruit new peoples.

So France is often a target because it is historically close to Muslim populations of Africa and often the final destination when migrating to Europe because it has good social security and no language barrier, unlike Italy, Greece or UK where you have to learn a new language. France is also still very present in Africa (language, industry, politics even money bills for some) so maybe if you ask a poor lost angry boy to name one Euro country, he will probably say France.

Then of course Charly drawing Muhammad or the gov forbidding religious clothes in schools was just another easy justification to attack the country.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Hebdo drawing wasn't light hearted fun though, it was right wingers trying to wind up religious people. Obviously there's never any excuse for murder but publicly attacking a whole religion will upset a lot of people, and things can lead on from that.

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

They were not right winger by any way, quite the opposite, they were100% anticlerical far left. Maybe stop talking about something you know nothing about?