this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
283 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2933 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Okay I don't want to be cliche... But if they get paid 1/10th of that money I'll eat my hat*

  • it's a figure of speech. I'll not pay up fyi
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

It's pretty clear, he doesn't have that kind of scratch and I think there are still lawsuits from the voting machine companies.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/rudy-giuliani-trial-net-worth-b2465068.html

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I like the cut of your jib sir

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Fkn lol, I’m sure he’s good for it, and if not, trump will definitely help.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

$16,171,000 to Freeman in compensatory damages for defamation;

$16,998,000 for Moss in compensatory damages for defamation;

$20 million each, or $40 million total, in compensatory damages for emotional distress;

$75 million in punitive damages for both

Interesting that they determined that he damaged Moss more than Freeman. Maybe one of them got more ugly threats than the other.

[–] pacoo2454@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Knowing very little of the facts, maybe it’s because Moss is younger and will be missing out on more income, since neither of them can get a job anymore. But that’s just my uneducated guess for the difference.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is what I'm curious about - assuming he doesn't pay, by claiming he's destitute, what other recourse do these people have? Their lives are completely upended, and they absolutely deserve this money.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In a state case they'd hire the sheriff to cease all his property and sell it at auction. Since it's federal, I assume the US Marshalls play the role of the sheriff.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

That's like... a lot. I bet he's sweating black sweat from his forehead right now.

thats a coffin nail for this piece of shit

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The decision comes at the end of a week-long federal civil trial in Washington D.C., where an eight-person jury heard from the workers — Wandrea "Shaye" Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman — about how 2020 election conspiracies spread by Giuliani and former President Donald Trump turned their lives upside down.

Jurors heard numerous violent and racist voicemails the women received, after Giuliani used his massive platform as a campaign attorney for Trump to spread lies about their actions as election workers in Georgia.

It's not the only legal trouble for Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor and two-term New York City mayor, related to his efforts to subvert Georgia's 2020 election.

Freeman broke down crying Wednesday as she described leaving her home after receiving a warning from the FBI that her life could be at risk.

I hope the federal government hangs you and your daughter from the Capitol dome," said one message Freeman received at the time.

"Mr. Sibley has a hard job," said Judge Howell at one point, after it came out that Giuliani had continued to lie about the women while talking to reporters on the courthouse steps earlier in the week.


The original article contains 688 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'd rather see him rotting in a jail cell but I'll take it.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Why he wasn’t disbarred over this is absolutely mind-blowing.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 9 months ago

I’m happy af about the judgement, but they’ll likely never receive a penny.