this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
150 points (89.5% liked)

Videos

14294 readers
237 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A decade ago was almost 2014. Bethesda's gane design was dated nearly two decades ago if we're being honest

[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Definitely. Shown by all the mechanics that have somehow digressed: stealth, meaningful random encounters, better bounty systems, innovative combat (e.g., VATS), etc.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fallout 3 Originally Released in 2008 and while not 'game breaking' if you'd pardon the pun - it was service-able. Starfield really doesn't feel any better than Fallout 3. It's the same amount of content with more empty space in between. I will say that the writing was better back then but maybe that's nostalgia.

I haven't seen anything like the Ant-agonizer vs the Mechanist in terms of originality in Starfield.

2004 would be between Oblivion (2006) and Morrowind (2002) which were quite a bit more player unfriendly.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That guy is pretty funny. Starfield was fun, but hollow. I didn't realize why until he pointed it out.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 11 months ago

Exactly what was wrong with it. I had a good time, but it wasn't Mass Effect levels of fun for me. Starfield was bigger, had more to do, and took the same amount of time to get through as the ME trilogy (120ish hours), but it was just..... Hollow.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is this the longest nakey jakey video essay yet?

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

No his one on rockstar was an hour I think

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Love nakey jakey

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Games like Starfield are proof gamers will only accept the bitter pill of newness, if it is surrounded by the over processed familiarity of old cheese.

[–] RedditRefugeeTom@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Great video, great guy. Always happy to see a Nakey Jakey video! It feels like he's the only one who really sees how things are. Its too bad consumers accept video games as they are right now.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Considering how expensive they're getting, I certainly started to wait a couple of days/weeks before purchasing anything now.

With the current state of the industry, it's saved both my time & money several times this year (unfortunately). Too many games I was excited for turned out to be unoptimised rubbish.

[–] RedditRefugeeTom@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Same! I have been very happy since becoming more patient with buying games after release. Has saved me money too!

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Social Media especially when it comes to gaming is a hivemind. FO3, 4 and Skyrim at the time were amazing and still are (FO4 and Skyrim still have quite high playercounts in steam). Starfield isn't great but this doesn't take away from other games.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 11 months ago

Are the interruptions from himself usual today?