I hate that stuff. Also websites that have lots of specific conditions for what a password contains. You're just increasing the likelihood of me forgetting it.
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
150 points (96.9% liked)
[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation
6590 readers
1 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
- Encourage conversation in your post
- Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
- Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I started using a password manager for a lot of my passwords. Works pretty well, it’ll generate criteria matching passwords for me. Also functions as a list of websites I’ve created accounts with.
Forgetting it?? All you have to do is scribble it on a little slip of paper in your top drawer like 90% of people do. Very secure.
Top drawer ! I think you it's still more secure than most of my colleagues. It's usually a post it on the monitor.
Post it on the monitor is for session password. For the 5 others, there is a txt file on the desktop!
And if you don't forget it, you'll use a simple one that's easy to guess or contains common substitutions, p@$$w0rd!. And then when you do forget it you'll call support who will reset it, and they get so many calls it will make taking over another account easier.
In case you haven't already seen it yet there's The Password Game to drive this point home
I don't think I've gotten past finding the correct length video. Getting that to work with everything else and keeping what's his face alive is just too much.
My company set up two factor for office 365. The type of verification used is the outlook app where you tap on something to gain access. I must have been one of the first to be required to change my password on the stupid 90 day schedule. After changing my 365 account pw I was locked out because I had to log in to the Outlook app and use the outlook app for verification, which didn't work due to the need to be logged in. You can't make this shit up.
Perfect security. Nobody can access.
That's on your IT department.
Well, it's also on Microsoft for selling their "modern" security theater bullshit to every IT department in the country while not designing it in a sensible fashion or working with third parties to provide meaningful alternatives to the Microsoft branded shit every employee will soon be required to install on their personal devices...
But that's also on your IT department for not warning you or allowing you to keep the SMS/phone verification as a backup for these exact situations. Those aren't depreciated yet, but some companies have let Microsoft's recommend security practices (co-written by their sales team) scare them into downright idiocy.
As someone in IT, here's what you do: Next time that sort of thing happens, just reach out to them immediately and have them reset everything. They may get annoyed, but you know what? They shouldn't be. It's more secure to have an employee call in every single time they need to change a password or re-authenticate a device. It's inconvenient, unnecessary, and downright annoying, wasting everyone's valuable time, but hey....it's more "secure'. If it's more secure, you aren't allowed to be against it.
Every few months my company forces a password reset. We recently changed from four digit pins to full true passwords but they don't actually explain that so now you have people with like 13 digit pins it's insane. On top of that they also use two-factor Authentication simply to make things harder I believe.
Finally if you want your work email on your phone it forces you to re login every single week and because of the way Outlook mobile works you need this special number from Outlook on your phone so to log into outlook on my phone I have to authenticate with Outlook on my phone
0118 999 881 99 911 9725 3
Finally an emergency phone number that i can remember
Any Insurance company * (I say so because as an IT Administrator I'm forced to enable this to keep our cyber insurance policy, but I feel rather confident it's unnecessary given the research and our migration to ldap tied fido).
I’m in this boat and I hate it.
I’ll drink to that!
All I know is the mortgage servicing company I use seems to have started ~3 month interval, that they don't say (no second factor available either). When I went to pay my internet bill, I get greeted with a message "you're passwords been reset". I'm stubborn and I was just using those sites to pay bills, so now I just don't log in to those anymore.
Insurance, and government need to catch up to the research. For sites that support them, I really like the Yubikey as a second factor.
It won’t be too long now before everyone rolls out Passkey support, which will be nice. I fully embrace the death of the password.
I like your optimism.
And the death of Firefox along with that. Oh boy what a great future.
Not sure why that would kill Firefox. Mozilla has done great work supporting passkeys and while their implementation isn't fully baked at the moment I have no reason to suspect they'll leave it incomplete.
BasePassword + today's date reporting for duty.
What about when you go and log in tomorrow?
Maintain security by changing passwords every day. Easy.
Mine rotates every 3 months for a 4-digit pin... Can't use a longer one, no 2fa.
Both companies I work for use Okta for 2fa AND also force us to change our passwords every 90 days, resulting in us using weak, easy to remember passwords. It's security theater.
I’m IT in a company that has this policy. Blame the cyber insurance.
I'm glad that in my company they disabled the password rotation after having implemented 2FA
Mine went to once a year for most systems. There is probably an external requirement somewhere that says they need to be changed periodically and once a year is the lowest frequency they can do.
This sounds like you don't use a password manager.
A password manager does nothing to stop Social engineering and human factors on the provider side.
wdym by "provider side" in this context?
As an example, if you have an online account with some bank. That bank would be the provider.
Well yes, me and the bank employees using a password manager does not stop social engeneering and human factors, but it limits the access of the attacker to the time period of the forced password change. If the attacker changes it, he is found out immediately, because the bank employee loses access. When the password expires the bank employee generates a new random password and the attacker loses access. Of course, using OTP features or a security token is better and narrows the attack window even more.
I don't think you're following.
First, you are an account holder in my answer not an employee.
Second, the reason its an issue has nothing to do with the actual password or password security. Frequent changes lead to simpler passwords. Someone is likely just to increment a number, so a new password is barley a hindrance if the previous one is compromised. Frequent changes are going to lead to more password resets, service personnel who have to deal with people forgetting passwords due to frequent resets/ changes are more likely to be complacent allowing an attacker to gain access through a reset. For company based passwords, frequent changes and high complexity requirements are more likely to lead to someone writing a password down near where that password is used.
No, you're not following. (I assumed I was an account holder in that example, but it's not important.)
Someone is likely just to increment a number, so a new password is barley a hindrance if the previous one is compromised.
Not if they use a password manager and click a button to completely randomize a new password. They do not have to worry they forget it, because they only have to memorize their master password.
KeePass Password Generation Options
Why would someone who was told to hit that button by IT increment a number instead?
Just automate it and gate it behind a strong passphrase and 2 factor the vault you use
https://github.com/Bubka/2FAuth
https://www.makeuseof.com/what-is-password-vault/
https://nerdschalk.com/8-best-self-hosted-password-managers/
https://www.hashicorp.com/resources/painless-password-rotation-hashicorp-vault
I know hashicorp has ruffled some feathers with the new terraform licensing but vault is still free and self hosted.
I think your missing the point. It doesn't matter how good an individuals security practices are if the system itself has bad security architecture.
So in your post you refer to, for example, an admin at microsoft headquarters having to change his password, not the user of one of microsofts services being forced to change their password?
I am generally more annoyed at the second bit, the user having to change their password. Both are problems, but internal policies for changes are usually documented and communicated.
Having to change the services password is just a few buttons in the password manager, but it helps mitigating brute force attacks and limits the attackers access to the validity period of the password. So that's very beneficial.
It doesn't matter how good an individuals security is, its the system that's a problem. Passwords are not often compromised through brute force. Password resets are a much more efficient entry method.
https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-FAQ/#q-b05
Q-B05: Is password expiration no longer recommended? A-B05:
SP 800-63B Section 5.1.1.2 paragraph 9 states:
“Verifiers SHOULD NOT require memorized secrets to be changed arbitrarily (e.g., periodically). However, verifiers SHALL force a change if there is evidence of compromise of the authenticator.”
Users tend to choose weaker memorized secrets when they know that they will have to change them in the near future. When those changes do occur, they often select a secret that is similar to their old memorized secret by applying a set of common transformations such as increasing a number in the password. This practice provides a false sense of security if any of the previous secrets has been compromised since attackers can apply these same common transformations. But if there is evidence that the memorized secret has been compromised, such as by a breach of the verifier’s hashed password database or observed fraudulent activity, subscribers should be required to change their memorized secrets. However, this event-based change should occur rarely, so that they are less motivated to choose a weak secret with the knowledge that it will only be used for a limited period of time.
Q-B06: Are password composition rules no longer recommended? A-B06:
SP 800-63B Section 5.1.1.2 paragraph 9 recommends against the use of composition rules (e.g., requiring lower-case, upper-case, digits, and/or special characters) for memorized secrets. These rules provide less benefit than might be expected because users tend to use predictable methods for satisfying these requirements when imposed (e.g., appending a ! to a memorized secret when required to use a special character). The frustration they often face may also cause them to focus on minimally satisfying the requirements rather than devising a memorable but complex secret. Instead, a blacklist of common passwords prevents subscribers from choosing very common values that would be particularly vulnerable, especially to an online attack.
Composition rules also inadvertently encourage people to use the same password across multiple systems since they often result in passwords that are difficult for people to memorize.
I use a password manager, but I can't realistically use one on my work computer, because the computer is locked. You want me to open my password manager on my phone and try and type it in?
Yeah, I'm gonna continue to use the bare minimum password that meets the requirements knowing full well it can be brute forced in under 5 minutes.
My employer deployed password managees company wide.
Sadly, I can't use a password manager to unlock my windows on my work pc.