this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
120 points (96.2% liked)

News

23638 readers
3586 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK (AP) — Most business economists think the U.S. economy could avoid a recession next year, even if the job market ends up weakening under the weight of high interest rates, according to a survey released Monday.

Only 24% of economists surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics said they see a recession in 2024 as more likely than not. The 38 surveyed economists come from such organizations as Morgan Stanley, the University of Arkansas and Nationwide.

Such predictions imply the belief that the Federal Reserve can pull off the delicate balancing act of slowing the economy just enough through high interest rates to get inflation under control, without snuffing out its growth completely.

High rates work to slow inflation by making borrowing more expensive and hurting prices for stocks and other investments. The combination typically slows spending and starves inflation of its fuel. So far, the job market has remained remarkably solid despite high interest rates, and the unemployment rate sat at a low 3.9% in October.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Every economists was predicting recession a few months back. They have an accuracy rate less than horoscopes

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Tbf, the act of predicting a recession can change the outcome, since the economy is just people reacting to things with money.

If everyone is expecting their houses to fall down from thin walls, so they start adding panels to their walls, suddenly the newly sturdy walls arent falling down anymore.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't even remotely true, why is it being upvoted?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe because it is true and no one wants to hear government economists bullshit about how everything is fine when everything is not fucking fine.

So sick of economist lying crap. Telling us we can't have universal healthcare and we can't get rid of student loan debt but we have to give free money to banks and trade with countries that have slavery.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's simply untrue.

Here is goldman sachs saying, over a year ago, that a path to a soft landing is hard but feasible. Here is an economist, from over a year ago, predicting that the chance of a soft landing was going up. Here are 3 economists writing for the Harvard business reviewing saying, back in Februrary, that the chances of a soft landing were good and calls for a recession were premature.

The whole point of the fed's policy on the rates was to tamp down on inflation while at the same time avoiding a recession. They are, of course, economists. At this point we look like we have good odds to pull of what they were intending to pull off.

I don't know where you get your information from, but if you thought no one thought was predicting a soft landing until a few months ago, well it's safe to say you don't really pay much attention to these things because plenty of economists have been predicting it likely, or going to happen, even for a long time. I've only heard a handful of economists even come close to virtually assuring a recession.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A thousand psychics making predictions every day and one being correct proves nothing.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A thousand psychics making predictions every day and one being correct proves nothing.

Untrue, as it proves, without a doubt proves that:

Every economists was predicting recession a few months back.

is untrue.

This is the advantage of basing your opinions off the facts, tas he facts actually support your claims.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't hear you over the sound of thousand of government economists saying everything is fine

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fed is a government economist, at least in some regard, so even that claim falls pretty empty.

But notice how I was able to back up my claims with facts, you just moved the goal posts, without admitting fault, to a new unsupported claim.

You're not clever, you're a joke.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any witches I can follow on Mastodon who provide stock analysis???

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No idea. Just buy and hold index funds and you will be fine.

[–] eek2121@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am unemployed and have been for many months. I have never had issues finding a job, but finding one lately has been impossible. I know of 3 others in the same boat as I. I think that a recession is inevitable at this point. Lucky for me, I have other sources of income. I did have to drastically cut back spending, however.

[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is definitely something going on lately. I'm always looking for better jobs on indeed, professional recruiting services etc, trying to improve my situation.

In the last 4 months its been seemingly impossible to even get a response, and I know I'm more than qualified for these positions I'm applying to, and I've never had an issue before, even during severe economic downturns.

[–] eek2121@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a nightmare scenario for me. What are the other sources of income, if you don't mind me asking?

[–] eek2121@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Website advertising and subscription revenue for websites I have owned for years. Spouse income as well.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Here's my gripe with economists. Even if this wasn't true, wouldn't be in the best interest of the economy to lie about it so the market doesn't get spooked and end up doing things that would make inflation worse?

What other 'science' has that nifty feature in it?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

You can make money on the economy going up or down, so there's generally economists predicting both. There's also a lot of economists that love to be the one to predict a recession, so they pretty much always predict one.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Regular medical science, it is called the placebo effect. It only works a bit. Not like you are going to regrow a limb, more like if you had a 40% of getting better on your own you now have a 50%.

Truth is economists can't predict shit and recessions happen based on numbers not based on feelings. We can't click our heels together and wish our way to a better world.

[–] electriccars@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

My initial thoughts exactly.

[–] willis936@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of the "scientists" that get laughed out of their field but get their Netflix "documentary" deal seem to use this neat trick.

They're particularly good at starting with a conclusion then shoehorning in a bad analysis with uncompelling evidence.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economists predict that now that the rich and ruling class have had a chance to get even rocher even faster, the rest of us will be allowed to catch our breaths just long enough to avoid sweeping reforms and revolutions the next time they pull this bullshit!

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They found the sweet spot between oops we broke it again and these poor people seem to be actually accumulating savings

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah we've just become too dependent

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow we went through nearly 3 years of recession start tomorrow and now it's not even going to happen. Even weather reporters are better.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 year ago

Weather doesnt read the weather report and change itself in response.

People read economics reports and spend differently in response.

Start giving the northern wind a newspaper, and you will see the weather report falter.

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just in time for a tumultuous election

The poor and middle class are sowing, the rich are reaping

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

"After a historic run-up in inflation, Americans are now starting to see something they haven’t in three years: deflation,” the Wall Street Journal reports.

“To be sure, deflation—that is, falling prices—is largely confined to appliances, furniture, used cars and other goods. Economywide deflation, when prices of most goods and services continuously fall, isn’t in the cards.”

“But economists say goods prices likely have further to fall, which will ease inflation’s return to the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, perhaps as early as the second half of next year.”

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this mean rent will get easier to pay, or am I still boned?

[–] MicroWave@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Well, according to the article:

Of course, economists are only expecting price increases to slow, not to reverse, which is what it would take for prices for groceries, haircuts and other things to return to where they were before inflation took off during 2021.

load more comments
view more: next ›