this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
2933 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Republican Ethan Grey explains what Republicans really want

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. —Frank Wilhoit

The same line of thought is quoted in a noteworthy article (archived) by Cory Doctorow.

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This goes quite nicely with the post where I learned about Oppositional Defiant Disorder.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was that post related to politics? I find sovereign citizens fascinating.

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed, it was a post over on kbin titled “Nearly a quarter of Republicans say classified docs charges make them more likely to support Trump: poll” https://kbin.social/m/politics/t/160848

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, republicans hate Americans and want to control every aspect of our lives. They hate freedom, whenever they see anyone expressing their liberty in a way they themselves wouldn’t they want to ban it.

[–] Nir@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, you guys need to touch some grass

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny you mention touching grass. Michael Parenti dedicates an entire chapter about how marijuana was used by Nixon to galvanize white moderates against the hippies during the Vietnam War in “Blackshirts and Reds.” You can even read it outside… on the grass.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In your opinion, what is it then?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Heh, see, the user you replied to is doing the thing. A rational and logical argument that leads you towards a specific conclusion. That sounds a lot like being told what to do. Their response was essentially “you can’t tell me what to do”.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My journey into trying to understand the conservative ideology began after Trump. I wanted to know what makes them tick. After exploring, I settled on Religion/Racism. But something wasn’t right. Which led me to authoritarianism and hierarchy. That was it. But why preserve hierarchy? Which led me to social dynamics and capitalism. What baffles me is that most are unaware that this is what they are preserving.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had a similar journey, around the same time. As an engineer, I tried to evaluate the situation in the same way that I’d analyze a system failure - that is, by conducting a “5 whys” (otherwise known as an RCA) in an attempt to drill down to the true root cause. I came to the exact same conclusions, along pretty much the same lines of investigation and research.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fascinating. Good to know I’m not the only one. I try to tell others about it, but they make me feel like a leper.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What thing? I didn't put nearly as much thought into my comment as you think I did.

That much is patently obvious

[–] Trolled@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago