this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
261 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
415 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was on the beta testing team and have been using Beeper for a little over two years now.

The convenience of having an application to house all of your chat networks is amazing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rbon@lemmy.sdf.org 135 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While I agree that it would be nice to only have one app installed in order to chat with everyone, the fact that it’s not open source makes me question the privacy involved. I’ve already sold my soul to these individual chat apps. I’d rather not compound that problem.

[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the back of it, it seems to be a series of Matrix bridges https://github.com/beeper

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh sweet. I care far more about the backend than frontend

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alex@agora.nop.chat 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

The bridges are all open source, and they use matrix synapse as their server installation - though their client is a closed source fork of element with changes. You can use any matrix client to connect to it, and they say it's a standard synapse setup.

If privacy is a concern, bringing your own client should remove that concern as the rest is open source. It's also e2e encrypted, as any matrix server is.

I self host my own matrix homeserver with bridges set up using their code. The only bit of their stack I can't use is the client. I don't like that that's closed source, that's frustrating.

Edit: while writing this two more people made the same comment. Sorry!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

The connections to the apps are all open source, as the other user said. And you can self host it too if you want to go that route

[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My worry would be who is funding it and how they plan to keep operating. Venture Capital startups will always betray their users.

[–] admin@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will be offering a premium subscription offer for more bells and whistles other than the free option...I don't know anything about user betrayals conducted by Beeper.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] realharo@lemm.ee 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This post reads like an ad, how is it upvoted so much?

[–] sam@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well known software built using Matrix. A lot of people have been following this project.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] matricaria@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried Beeper two weeks ago.

Performance was not great and I didn’t like the apps design that much but most importantly: this is not what I want. I want chat apps to be interoperable. I don’t want to be on WhatsApp and Signal and Matrix and yadayadayada. I want to be only on Matrix in the future. I hope the EUs DMA makes that happen.

[–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree, but this provides a path towards that. It is Matrix underneath so if we get a proportion of people using Beeper they it becomes easy to transition to using Matrix to talk to those people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The last time I heard the word beeper it referred to a pager. You kids know what a pager was?

[–] admin@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You kids know what a pager was?

Yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's reasons people moved away from multi-network apps like Trillian and Gaim/Pidgin... They were always playing catch-up with the official clients, and frequently broke when there were server-side changes. Protocols for proprietary messaging apps were (and still are) undocumented. I'm not convinced they've actually solved any of these issues.

[–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

If Beeper does become a successful business though, there'll be a full time development team "playing catch-up" with money behind them. It's interesting if you read this that they're rolling out features ahead of the message providers in some cases!

They're also leveraging some existing infrastructure. Beeper is built on Matrix which does a lot of the heavy lifting for them.

[–] dan@upvote.au 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

Most of the protocols supported by Trillian were walled gardens too - AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, etc were all proprietary.

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

Trillian had paid full-time developers too. I'm not sure what'd they'd be doing differently to what Trillian did.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I think one difference is that the rate of change in chat apps has slowed down dramatically. When was the last time one of the major apps added a new feature you can't live without anymore? So it might be easier now to keep up.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Huh, in my opinion people simply moved away, because the underlying messenger were used less and less. Once everyone ran around with smartphones using WhatsApp, fewer and fewer people cared about MSN, ICQ, etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

think I'm gonna give this a try but the style of writing in the blog post isn't making this easy

👩‍🚀 Spacebar

Not the one on your keyboard, silly 😜

shudders

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok but why is the thumbnail a scene from Midsommar…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For… free… seems like people make a very strong effort to not learn a shit from experiences

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Right this sounds like giving all of my personal messages to one more entity.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago

This looks like a promising application; and as long as the business models stay sustainable and the company remains ethical; it should be a good place.

I'll bite and queue up.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Pidgin. That failed. Then we have matrix. That kinda failed. And now beeper?

I don't know..

[–] fearout@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why do you feel like matrix has failed? I joined it recently and to me it looks like it’s kinda growing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irasponsible@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago

Beeper is Matrix in a trenchcoat, judging by their Github page.

[–] philpo@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

How did Matrix fail?

It's the base for numerous messengers used by governments around the world, it has a userbase of more than 70 million core users (not counting the various closed messengers). Various competitors (e.g. Rocket Chat) have changed their base to Matrix.

And Beeper is Matrix with Bridges (which you absolutely could deploy yourself). In theory anyone could recreate the Beeper functionality with existing other apps/bridges AND be able to communicate with Beeper on their native standard - Matrix.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Seathru@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This looks like a modern Trillian. It's about time.

[–] Sordid@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm skeptical. Trillian still exists, but hardly anyone uses it. It can't connect to a bunch of services because their operators decided to disable third-party access. I remember that even back in the day, it was constantly playing catch-up with network updates that broke compatibility. A "one chat app to rule them all" is a neat idea, but I don't see it working in practice.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ASK_ME_ABOUT_LOOM@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Would beeper give me access to iMessage without having an iDevice?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I'll never use a service asking me upfront my phone number "for security purposes." Fuck off beeper!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly this app sounds almost too good to be true, but I’ll be keeping an eye on it anyways just in case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fades@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the cost is simply your privacy and security

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently it's based on matrix bridges, and you can self-host it if you want. Sounds intriguing imo.

[–] fades@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It’s not all bad, you’re right. It’s just that this

To use Beeper, you must give the app permission to send and receive messages through other chat networks using your account credentials. By definition, this may be less secure than using other chat apps alone, especially encrypted chat apps like Signal.

Makes me lose interest. I understand the motivation behind it, yes they encrypt e2e but it’s still sacrificing security (or maybe I should say increasing risk)

Self hosting is a good alternative option!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well universal chat (like universal e-mail) is either going to be a common open protocol (does not seem very likely given Apple and all the other players) or is going to be something like this on the client side. Although its a lot of work, it does seem more possible. The only pity is it can't solve connecting to services that I don't use like Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp.

[–] anytimesoon@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The EU is forcing the big chat companies to open their gates. They have until April of next year to comply, so we might see a common protocol for chat pretty soon

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›