this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Knorff@alien.top 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The English line-up was decided by a FA committee. Every player was nominated for a certain position and had to play this position.

The Hungarian line-up was decided by their coach. Especially their forwards didn´t care about positions.

You can see why Hungary won and England was very confused the whole game.

Extra info: The statistic was around 35:5 shots on goal for Hungary.

[–] mexploder89@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Extra info: The statistic was around 35:5 shots on goal for Hungary

And England scored 3? Damn

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaimalaugenou@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

1954 worldcup was for them

[–] Jayk03@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Hungary beat England 4-0 at their home again in Nation league.

[–] Wide_Thought7589@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Fun fact.

The captain of the England team that lost 6-3 and 7-1 to Hungary was Billy Wright.

Billy Wright has a statue in front of Molineux Stadium in Wolverhampton.

The same Molineux where Hungary beat England 4-0 in the Nations League last year.

Maybe Billy Wright is just cursed?

[–] Aenjeprekemaluci@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

What would have been if the Communists didnt go rampant. Hungary might have been an elite team till today.

[–] MimesAreShite@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

they were still a top team well into the seventies (just checked, and i think the first time they dropped out of the Elo top 10 post-WW2 was 1974).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThinkAboutThatFor1Se@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The true travesty of the communist era laid bare.

[–] No_Nothing101@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] I_miss_Chris_Hughton@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The odds of them having that sort of team again though are tiny. Even brazil struggle to replicate teams like the wc70 team.

[–] chappersbarfo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

If anything communism had a focus on competing at a global level in sports hence why the Soviet Union got to a semifinal, Poland got to two (or three can't remember) and czechoslovakia even won the euros.

[–] NiK3_Aub4mey4ng@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

i mean it’s also would be a ‘what-if’ that if Hungary won in ‘54, does the uprising have in ‘56

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sheehonip@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Next to Ramsey, what does '11-Esbol mean'?

[–] AlhamdolilahFE@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Just looked it up and saw that Ramsey scored a penalty kick. 11-esbol would mean 11 meters and thus a penalty I think lol

[–] KnightsOfCidona@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Always forget Alf Ramsey was a player, in my head he's always a middle aged bald man with a posh accent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] belokas@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago
[–] _cumblast_@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

In football its is a widespread belief that in order to be remembered you need to win silverware.

Hungary of that time is one of the exceptions to that rule.

[–] cib_vk228@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Nonsense. Hungary '54 and Netherlands '74 lost in final, but are still remembered fondly.

[–] The-Florentine@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So exactly what OP said then.

[–] paddyo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Nonsense, it's exactly what OP said.

[–] SpookyHideaway@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s hardly “nonsense”. OP said that Hungary are one of the exceptions. There’s not that many teams who didn’t win a tournament who end up remembered to that extent.

Hungary are unusual too in that they only had a brief period with those players. If they were from a different country and stayed together as a group they would have had another go in 1958.

[–] bb9622@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This Hungary team only had 1 major tournament. Hungary withdrew from the 1950 WC, afaik it was because of the 1952 Olympics (which they won and I have no idea how highly it was regarded back then), then they played in the 1954 WC (there were no Euros at the time, it only started in 1960), and then the 1956 revolution happened.

[–] SpookyHideaway@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Yes that’s what I was referring to in my post. It was a brief period where they were the best.

The Olympics was regarded as relatively important then. Not to everyone but much more than now. It’s why the game against England had added prestige as they were arriving as Olympic champions.

[–] WalkingCloud@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Totally disagree, Hungary '54 and Netherlands '74 are remembered even though they didn't win silverware IMO

[–] Matthew_1453@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Though you just mentioned the same 2 teams as the other reply. Those are the 2 major exceptions (obviously there's others too)

[–] WalkingCloud@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Though you just mentioned the same 2 teams as the other reply.

Ya think?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueAzania@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love how English can confuse someone if they're not well-conversant with the language.

[–] _cumblast_@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

How do you mean? Did i say something wrong

[–] shyguyJ@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I think he was just joking about silverware and hungry.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JacquouileFripouile@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

My great grandpa used to tell me about Hungarian Laka Konjica when I was a wee lad. He told me that there was no football fan who didn't love them

[–] el_brahmo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ist’s the match of the century the 1970 WC semi final match Germany against Italy ?

[–] Schnurzelburz@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Yes.

https://www.fifa.com/fifaplus/en/articles/100-great-world-cup-moments-qatar-2022-10-game-of-the-century-italy-west-germany-1970

Not surprising that the 3-6 would be the match of hte century in Hungary, though.

[–] unorthodoxEconomist5@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Depends, some consider France Brazil in 1986

[–] hafrances@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When I was in Budapest for the EL final I saw a huge mural of this result painted on some random residential building

[–] I_miss_Chris_Hughton@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Made me feel bad for Gil Merrick, who is slathered on there Even though as far as I can tell he was sort of left out to dry by a bad formation

[–] yesimhilarious@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

To this day we hold "memorials" for the 3:6 but how come 7:1 doesn't get the same treatment?

[–] belokas@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Because that was the first time England lost a game at home. The second time it happened they already knew England was bad and Hungary was very good.

[–] ledknee@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

*First time England lost at Wembley

[–] Such_Technician_501@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Actually Ireland was the first team to beat England at home. September 1949. 2-0 at Goodison Park.

Doesn't quite fit the narrative that they could only be beaten by the exotic Mighty Magyars though.

[–] ledknee@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Playing against Ireland in Liverpool is an away game for England

[–] Such_Technician_501@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago
[–] whitsitcalled@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Scotland first beat England in 1877 and were the first team to beat them at Wembley. Wales and Ireland (original Ireland football team for the entire island) both beat England multiple times in England before 1953 but Hungary were the first continental European team to beat England in England which is why it's so well known.

[–] bb9622@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

that was the first time England lost a game at home.

It wasn't. It was the first home game they lost to a team from the European continent though.

[–] WalkingCloud@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The second time it happened they already knew England was bad and Hungary was very good.

I know what you mean, but genuinely that England team weren't 'bad', Hungary were that good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Upplands-Bro@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The galloping major 👑

Billy Wright still at the shops decades later

[–] OllieStavsToothgap@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

born in 1924 and still in the mud. absolute shambles

[–] just_some_guy65@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Was this to do with the Hungarians not using the only formation (the oddly named traditional 5-3-2) that the England players understood so they were stuck rigidly marking thin air?

[–] leanmeanguccimachine@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

In the quote he says England were playing a WM formation, which was 3-2-2-3.

[–] CeterumCenseo85@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've only ever known Italy vs Germany in the 1970 WC referred to as "The Game of the Century." The stadium in Mexico even has a sign commemorating as such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quanqiuhua@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Why were England considered good by this time? They already had crashed out in the first round in Brazil losing two matches including against an amateur side.

load more comments
view more: next ›