this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
155 points (97.5% liked)

politics

21589 readers
4278 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“I feel proud of what I did. I think everything was justified. Numbers don’t represent fully what these assets are worth,” McConney said. “I got to do a lot of things normally an accountant wouldn’t be able to do. I’m very proud of the work I did for 35 years.”

eh... maybe there's a reason most accountants aren't allowed to cook the books? maybe? Cry me a river, build a bridge and get over it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Numbers don’t represent fully what these assets are worth

I'm no accountant, but I'm pretty sure they're supposed to, Jeffrey.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. Any decent accountant or financial manager would know this. The fact that he made this statement at best means he's incompetent at his job and at worst is an indication of crocodile tears.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, things aren't worth more than their value unless there's sentimentality associated with it, and no one's getting sentimental over a hotel. Nothing professional will ever value something beyond numbers, this is a gigantic embarrassment for him.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thing is, it wouldn’t surprise me if this guy was being sincere. Take it to be a sign of our times, but I could see this guy getting lulled into the cult unwittingly. Always remember some Trumpers know what they’re doing and others don’t; the extremists deserve the rack (figuratively, of course), but most of them just deserve a stiff smack in the head and a scolding.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

“Look, you can’t just like, appraise things for some kind of dollar value and pretend that that’s what they’re worth.” — This guy’s appraiser.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I saw the headline, I thought it meant that he was remorseful, but of course he just feels sorry for himself because the law ruined his good thing.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

He’s sorry he got caught. Not that he did it. Just that there’s now consequences

[–] teft@startrek.website 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I got to do a lot of things normally an accountant wouldn’t be able to do.

Yeah, crime.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.

I’m looking forward to mocking the poor-pity-me-speech from trump when he gets to that stage.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dunno. I used to accountant. We did a lot of crimes

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

"I did it for 35 years! I never thought consequences would every come! sob"

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

“I loved fraud so much! And then the cops ruined it…”

[–] pntha@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

At one point while reviewing his own handwritten notes, McConney acknowledged his memory was “incorrect” about a specific disclosure on Trump’s statement. Seeing the handwritten edits also published in the final statement version, he acknowledged he must have primarily written the disclosure about asset valuations that deviated from generally accepted accounting principles.

someone get this fraud a golden raspberry

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Oh boo hoo.

[–] WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Crocodile tears.