this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
299 points (95.4% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2555 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The anti-Islam, euroskeptic radical Geert Wilders is projected to be the shock winner of the Dutch election.

In a dramatic result that will stun European politics, his Freedom Party (PVV) is set to win around 35 of the 150 seats in parliament — more than double the number it secured in the 2021 election, according to exit polls.

Frans Timmermans’ Labour-Green alliance is forecast to take second place, winning 25 seats — a big jump from its current 17. Dilan Yeşilgöz, outgoing premier Mark Rutte’s successor as head of the center-right VVD, suffered heavy losses and is on course to take 24 seats, 10 fewer than before, according to the updated exit poll by Ipsos for national broadcaster NOS.

A win for Wilders will put the Netherlands on track — potentially — for a dramatic shift in direction, after Rutte’s four consecutive centrist governments. The question now, though, is whether any other parties are willing to join Wilders to form a coalition. Despite emerging as the largest party, he will lack an overall majority in parliament.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 170 points 11 months ago (24 children)

What the fuck is happening to the world?

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 137 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Far right extremists claim easy solutions to complex problems. With housing etc pricea going through the roof it's easy to demonize foreigners etc.

Look what happened in Germany with hyper inflation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 73 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

This is the first generation with worse prospects than the previous one. Wealth inequality is growing, and robber barons are back. Climate change is making any prospects even worse.

Combine that with a communication revolution (social media, to be exact) which allows anyone to pretty much target anyone else with any message they feel like, means disinformation pushing narratives is everywhere. And not to forget, there people in charge of these platforms are among the aforementioned robber barons.

It's easy to offer simple solutions to these problems and push disinformation to people who don't have the knowledge, time or energy to debunk everything and think deeply about things, since they're busy slaving away to put food on their tables, struggling to build a future, and looking for solutions. And simple answers give people a sense of control or explanation over their difficult situation.

It's why I have completely removed myself from every social media platform there is, except this one and I'm only on here intermittently.

[–] fromagemangeur@mander.xyz 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True, but the generation that tends to vote far right is the boomer generation - it's the generation that failed to pass on rising prosperity and gave us the climate crisis.

[–] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If you look at elections in europe, it's pretty consistently the 35-45 year old demographic that votes right the most. Every age group votes right and it's not like it's only boomers, with the exception of young voters <30 (and women) which do vote significantly more left

E. G. Netherlands https://www.statista.com/chart/8178/pvv-largest-party-but-not-among-youth/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

Good question. But honestly you just got to look at history for the answer. Far-right extremism often do better when it's hard times like we have right now.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Amongst other things: Russia.

https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Trolls-Frontlines-Russias-Information/dp/1632461293

And in this specific case, it's literally Russia: https://nltimes.nl/2023/10/19/leaked-documents-show-connections-pvv-russia -- this is often the case for far-right European parties. Russia supports them quite significantly. This is one of the thousand reasons why Russia needs to be stopped and seriously discouraged in Ukraine. I have some hope that now that Putin has played his hand, his influence in European parties will start to diminish. But it's not looking good yet.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Geert Wilders is a 100% israeli puppet. At 17 years old Geert went to live as an illegal occupier for 2 years in the West-Bank for the israelis. He has visited israel at least 40 times the last 25 years, more than once a year.

A quote from an NOS article about Geert Wilders life as a colonist: (Dutch article)

The later founder of the PVV resides in the West Bank, territory occupied by Israel since 1967. "Although I prefer to call it 'liberated territory'."

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Look up what Stephen harper is president of right now.

I don't think this is Russia. Its ex Canadian PM

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

We are unfortunately in one of those moments in history where far right authoritarianism is troublingly in vogue.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The right has a cohesive strategy for getting and keeping an animated base, while the libs are focusing on maintaining a status quo that people hate and are creating voter apathy.

[–] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just to be clear liberal doesn't really make that much sense in Europe as it dose in the US. Liberals are mostly on the right side of politics while in the US it's on the left. So if you where to talk with European people then they would talk about the left or the right. In my country for instance the only party that is truly liberal is all the way to the right. The left is socialists mostly and while the US have some socialists the democrats in the US is much more to the right than most Europe "left" would be.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 10 points 11 months ago

Right, you do have some politicians in the US like Bernie Sanders and Alexandra Occasio-Cortes who would be considered Social Democrats in Europe. But yeah, US politics are really opaque due to the two-party system. There are a lot of politicians in the Democratic party who would be considered center-right market liberals in Europe.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

From what I see, the center left politicians in Europe are still liberals supporting capitalism. More of a social democracy which is for sure better than the individualistic libertarian ideas being promoted in the states, but capitalist none the less. Still not fully addressing the ethics of the population as a whole.

Also, I do realize that America isn't the center of the world, but it definitely has serious impact on what the people of the world see as the trajectory of the future. Especially if (and this is pure speculation) if the right is able to create fox style echo chambers in other countries using the narrative of following the American superpower.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

Capitalism makes living harder, populist fascism fools voters, cycle repeats

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's going fascist.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Everyone thinks that Russia became hostile with war in Ukraine. They were already fighting war with the West for years and it is bringing fruits. It is the war of disinformation and unlike the traditional hot war, they are very good at it and it is now bringing fruits.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Other parties haven't taken any called for measures when it comes to immigration, now far-right is reaping the benefits.

It's pretty shit but sorta expected if you just stubbornly avoid addressing the issues people have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

They’ll probably have 16 parties getting seats and many refuse to work with him. He’s not going to be prime minister or anything.

[–] steven@infosec.pub 6 points 11 months ago

Sure, but that only works up to a certain point. When they are ignored, voters will get even more annoyed and he might grow towards next election and become impossible to ignore. The same is happening with Vlaams Belang in Vlaanderen.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 93 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The slide towards far-right fascism continues...

[–] Darkblue@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Don't worry, the headline is too sensational. (Which is a pet peeve of mine anyway: headlines should be objective. I can make up my own mind please)

He didn't win a majority. He won't form a goverment. If he does, he will be powerless in the coalition. If he does get to make laws, they won't pass the senate (called "1ste kamer" in NL). And if he does, the government will fall anyway (which is a Dutch tradition anyway).

So a lot of 'outs' :)

No worries!

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Only your last one seems valid. Dutch coalitions aren't very stable. The only stable factor of the last 12 years has recently left politics.

The question is indeed who is willing to form a coalition government. The most likely option is PVV (far right), VVD (neoliberal), and NSC (Christian democrats), of the latter can convince their voters they can accept the far right.

[–] Darkblue@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not very stable indeed. Since 'Kok' (2002!), NL has had 1 cabinet come to full term (Rutte II I believe). In 21 years 8 goverments. 1 full term of 4 years, so 7 in 17 years. Elections every 2,5 years on average :/

But hey, at least NL is not Belgium :D

[–] Vrijgezelopkamers@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

So just any belgian noises then?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (3 children)

He only got 25% of the vote and it's a consolidation of other right wing votes, so there is no right wing majority.

So it's not much different than earlier elections, but now it's concentrated in his party, making him the largest.

He will not be able to form a government without making concessions. And making concessions will lose him voters.

So yeah, interesting times, but I am not worried.

[–] deranger@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The headline seems much more sensational than the numbers lead me to believe.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

In most countries "winning" the election implies having a majority.

In coalition countries like ours, it only means becoming the biggest party.

Hence why the headline might lead people to a wrong conclusion.

Practically speaking, it's more important which potential coalition has a majority. And the parties on the right don't have a clear majority, nor do the left parties.

So it will either be a center-right or center-left coalition.

Center-right will be attempted first, since we customarily let the largest party initiate, but it will be quite difficult since we have two chambers and different parties on the right are big in different chambers.

If he fails, center-left has a clear majority in both chambers with the same parties.

Edit: need to correct a mistake. Center-left also doesn't have a clear majority in both chambers. Two of the big parties in this election have very few seats in the other chamber.

But not a problem, we often have coalitions that don't have a majority in the Senate. Our House (this election) is more decisive and the Senate more facilitating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (8 children)

If you're gonna ban Islam, at least ban every other religion at the same time so you don't look like a racist.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheIvoryTower@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (15 children)

People need to understand that in a democracy, winning the plurality of the votes is not the same as winning the election. If no-one will work with him, he will not be in government.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

Not elect fascists worldwide (challenge impossible )

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Wilders wants to ban mosques

That's cool, as long as we ban churches, cathedrals, synagogues, and temples at the same time.

I really didnt know this guy was still around, he hasn't been making the world headlines so much in recent years.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Don't forget gurdwaras, stupas, and wats.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why do they all have weird fucking hair?

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

At this point, it's not even weird. I'm just glad they aren't tarnishing any look I would miss. I mean, in an alternate universe, I could see myself rocking a Chaplin moustache. But they can have the thinning, wiry, bizarrely-styled blond look all to themselves.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Politics of me" beats "politics of we" once again.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 17 points 11 months ago

More like "politics of being to dumb to see further than the tip of if my own nose".

[–] MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Aww....the rest of the world is going through their own Trump phase now.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Shit's contagious, like covid

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the world is falling to fascism. Fuck this goddamn planet just smite us already jesus fucking christ

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›