this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1218 points (95.9% liked)

Firefox

17763 readers
183 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 204 points 11 months ago (11 children)

It’s time to get rid of user-agent strings that declare anything other than desktop, mobile, or html version.

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

If I was a Firefox dev I'd start looking into building in user agent spoofing right into the browser.

It already opens Facebook pages in a special isolated tab. They could have apple.com open in it's own special "safari" tab. I wonder if there's anything preventing them from doing that. I guess it could be bad because it would make their market share appear even smaller.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 37 points 11 months ago

The irony of Firerfox officially agent spoofing while everyone else uses some variant of "Mozilla" as their UAS is too much.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think user agent scrambling is part of privacy.resistFingerprinting, but it's a controversial feature and breaks a lot of webpages

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Broken webpages might be a good thing. There are too many browsers that aren’t adhering to standards. Stop coding around it and start publicly shaming these megacorps.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 35 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The biggest offender is, surprisingly, cloudflare. They will straight up refuse to serve you any site if your user agent is not one of the mainstream ones. It's not even "find the traffic light to prove you're human", but a page basically saying "fuck you, go away".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

User agents are not unfortunately not the only way to identify a browser, there are other ways to fingerprint a platform.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 115 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Actually, the top one is the logo of the chromium browser engine, but the bottom one is not the logo of the Gecko browser engine. That's the logo of SpiderMonkey, Firefox's Javascript engine (Chromium uses V8).

This is the logo for Gecko: Gecko logo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 96 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

It's especially moronic that Cloudflare thinks everyone using Tor is trying to DDOS every site.

Do you know how fucking slow Tor is? You couldn't DDOS an Arduino with it.

[–] QwertySpace@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

Probably because there are A LOT of people using that tor exit node that have visited that site recently. So, cloudflare sees it as a potential DDOS

[–] candle_lighter@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

Onion sites get DDOS attacks constantly. That's why Dread has so many backup links.

[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 10 points 11 months ago

afaik, cloudflare has an option to disallow tor traffic. so the website owner decided they don't want tor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 85 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do we, as an industry, have such short attention span, that we forgot how Microsoft abused their monopoly in the 1990s to force everyone to use Internet Explorer? Now that Google is doing the exact same thing, nobody seems to mind.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because the tech gigacorporations have literally spent the last three decades brainwashing us into accepting shit like that and even convincing us that it's better this way.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 months ago

Not better. No one thinks anything is better, just that we don't have a choice but to take what they serve.

[–] snoopfrog@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

I remember using Netscape (my Google keyboard didn't know that word) before Firefox and SeaMonkey. I mostly used SeaMonkey to edit HTML and Firefox for my casual browsing.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 66 points 11 months ago (20 children)

I get the joke but I don't have any problems visiting websites. Neither with firefox nor with mull

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Go to https://business.apple.com/#/main/users

Reset your user agent string. It will tell you that your browser is unsupported. Switch your user string to chrome and everything will function as expected.

IT people probably run into more problems with non-chromium browsers.

Edit: it has to be visited on a desktop regardless. ABM does not like mobile browsers.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)

IT person here, Firefox works fine for everything that matters.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's highly subjective. At our org there's a reason our baseline deployment for workstation images comes with both Chrome and Firefox. We have thousands of users across dozens of specialties (HR, logistics, scientists, engineers, etc) and they all have a multitude of web apps they use day to day. Some of those don't like Chrome or Firefox. Hell, we even had to support god damn IE11 for way too long before Microsoft thankfully forced its death by discontinuing security support (our cybersecurity people ban anything that doesn't have active vendor support with very few exceptions).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the hell is wrong with apple?

That's not firefox' fault

Btw: what's abm?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apple business management? Just guessing from context.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dRLY@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here is the problem with changing the user agent (IMO). It just re-enforces the idea that Chrome/Chromium browsers are the only browsers and therefore sites should just be coded for them. Which they are currently the most common for people to be using since even Microsoft gave up on IE and the original Edge. But the fact that Microsoft and Google are still the most dominate OS'es means that we are just seeing IE all over again. With sites being coded to only expect Chromium, then they are just set to not even allow them to be loaded by anything else.

The fact that so many of the sites do in fact work with Firefox/Safari when the user agent is set to falsely report that it is Chrome/Chromium should be kind of concerning. Just leads to false narratives that other options are not worth using due to being bad products. Kind of like how in the US we are conditioned to believe that there are only two parties to choose from and all other options shouldn't be allowed or are never okay to support.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I 100% expect websites to soon start breaking their interface on Firefox. With Chromium blocking the best adblockers, they will be incentivized to nudge people to Chromium browsers.

Didn’t we already see Youtube sneaking in a 5 second delay for Firefox users?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 11 months ago

My wife was recently in school. Almost all the services she used decline to render unless you're using Chrome.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] JockerBlack@lemmy.ml 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's "how it feels" or "what it feels like", not "how it feels like"

[–] ieatmeat@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Thank you! Also "how it looks" and "what it looks like". I see people messing those up all the time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dvdnet89@lemmy.today 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

my company give choice to use Firefox and Chrome and it is mandatory to install those browsers on those computers. But, 95% use Chrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 11 months ago

Brave isn't doing much better with captchas lately due to having adblocking built in, google is just on a crusade against anyone blocking stuff.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's so absurd. It feels like half of the websites out there actively don't want me to visit them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago
[–] bobo@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What is the second browser from the bottom on the right?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 months ago
[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

As the other two said, Librewolf. It's basically a very privacy-focused fork of Firefox, where just about all privacy settings are on by default.

[–] MylesRyden@social.vivaldi.net 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

@bobo @SoccerGod

Now that is driving me crazy, it looks so familiar, but I just can't place it.👿

Found it!

It's Librewolf, a Firefox fork.

https://librewolf.net

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Their browser on Android relies on Chromium, on Windows it uses Edge's webview thingy and on macOS Safari afaik

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›