this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
136 points (77.9% liked)

Privacy

31278 readers
442 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sar1n@infosec.pub 99 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I've also noticed that if you do a search, click a result, then hit back to go back to the results they manipulate the results in some weird way so they're not the exact same results you got the first time. Infuriating

[–] 69420@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the new quantum search feature: you changed the results by observing them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes! I thought I was losing my mind. I was like "I swear this was the third result but now it's the 5th? Eh, maybe it was the 5th."

[–] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ducks are learning to gaslight people. Fascinating.

[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah I hate that. Now all results have to be opened in new tabs just in case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Odd. I wonder what is going on here because when I search that exact same query I get accurate results.

I’ve had iffy search results before but never anything that bad.

[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 16 points 10 months ago

I also don’t get the same results. I also have tracking and fingerprinting disabled everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devbo@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.

[–] mtchristo@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It has been doing this shit for a while. Returning results based on just one key word out of many keywords from my query.

Lately they have been even ignoring the restrictive +"keyword" syntax and returning whatever shit just so they won't admit their (or Microsoft's indexer) is shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What would we suggest as a realistic alternative? Sears? Startpage? Brave? (I am no expert by the way, just looking for tips)

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

I just switched to using Kagi recently and I like it a lot so far! Theres a free tier for 100/searches a month you can use to figure out if you like it.

[–] coughrelief@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Searx sucks for images in my experience, startpage was bought by an advertising company, brave is weird for a multitude of reasons but I don't know how good their search engine is as I've never tried it

However I do think that finding a searx instance that works for you and then using another engine like ddg for images is the way to go... You could add a shortcut like ".ddg garbage truck" for easily searching with for example ddg on firefox

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How does searx suck for images exactly? 🫠

[–] melooone@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also a bit confused by this. I thought the point of searxng is to combine your preferred search engines. So couldn't I just configure ddg for the image results?

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Maybe their point was that you cannot filter the images, like by color, size, license, etc

But anyway, if I want to show somebody a picture of something it works perfectly As for the results, they are pretty comparable between searx, ddg, and googlag.

I would even say searx wins on this one because 1. It's easier to navigate and open images 2. The nojs version of the search looks so much better than any other search engine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metacolon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

I've been using metager for some while and really like it. They're also part of an initiative pushing for a free as in freedom search index, so that's nice

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Try kagi.com

I you have to pay for it, but t's amazing

[–] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'll take the trial sometime and see if I should drop the cents

[–] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Thanks for mentioning Kagi! I've been looking for some Google/DDG replacement but every single one I've tried had some sort of dealbreaking drawback for me. Google collects all my data and heavily filters my results, DDG provides dogshit results most of the time I don't even bother using it, Startpage is awfully slow, and I didn't even get to understand what Searx is as looking for it led me to some random ugly pages.

Subbed for 1 year 10 bucks plan. Works super-fast on mobile too. Hell yeah!

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 17 points 10 months ago

I get the same shit at work where I can't use a VPN: like 7-8 relevant results then basically just ads for local businesses after that.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

I have still the same good results in ddg, no matter what device or browser. I have noticed that they have some location bias when ddg (and any other search engine i have tried) has non good results globaly but good resulta locally.

Still better then anything i have tested. Just because there are minor anomalies i will stick with them.

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have searx, and i'm feeling like a god of search, better than google, better that bingbinggo, and anything else Although I had a lot of problems with it when I was hosting it on a RPI and docker, now i'm not, and it's just so much better

[–] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

What was the problem with Docker? I want to host it myself, the docker option seems to be the easiest one.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

I'd guess the RPI part would be the bigger issue.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Liome@pawb.social 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It does though? Right under the search bar there should be a switch bar to turn on localized search, and a dropdown to pick different location.
Or is it itself location locked?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thanksforallthefish 3 points 10 months ago

Nope not locked. I have always on vpn (random countries) anti fingerprinting and DDG happily allows the search localisation to my actual or a different country

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

On DDG I can type in an exact company or product name and not get a proper result, it's crazy. Google seems to find the stuff no problem, it's really quite frustrating when the search engine isn't even capable of basic queries.

[–] TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub 11 points 10 months ago

Yes, I have the same issue with DDG for something like a year now. I can't use it anymore for basic searches, I feel like the bing api they are using is getting worse and worse.

[–] somedude@lemmy.ninja 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If you’re looking for a new search engine, I’ve been using paid search provider, Kagi.com, for the last few months. They’ve been great.

[–] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Slowly but surely I am coming to the realisation that free services sooner or later will drift away from their privacy claims

[–] somedude@lemmy.ninja 10 points 10 months ago

Precisely. Ad and user data supported products will always balance making their users happy, with making their paying customers happy.

[–] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Pricing seems a bit odd to me What happens if you don't spend all your searches? Does it carry over to next month?

Wouldn't it be better to pay as you go? Without the monthly requirements if they gonna have a limit anyway.

[–] Benjameee@snowstorm.online 4 points 10 months ago

Same! Switched over to kagi a couple months ago and I've been loving it!

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I paid for Kagi and have been super happy with it. If you don't mind paying, I highly recommend it. Not having ads or manipulated results is worth it for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rab@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

I feel like ddg has never had good search results

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I turned JS off other than for specific websites. This includes DDG. It gives me accurate results, although the other commenters don't seem be facing your problem either

[–] ejmin@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Same here. Every time I ditch Google and go to ddg, I just laugh how irrelevant all the results are and I continue feeding Google with personal data and telemetry and whatnot.

It is true that even Google's results feel much worse than before but it's still significantly better than ddg.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not for me – if DDG is trash, Google is actually unusable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlatypusXray@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

I feel like Qwant has become the best when it comes to the quality of the search results. My experience with kagi is limited, though.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It might be blindly searching for websites that contain any of the words scan, mark 2, pro.

It seems to do that when it can't find a page with all of the words, and the only way I know to fix it is put the whole thing in quotation marks.

[–] kglitch@kglitch.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The only time I use ddg is to find conspiracy sites to add to the blocklist I maintain. All the trash rises to the top in that search engine. It's rubbish.

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tell me more...

Do you maintain the block list to avoid conspiracies or because these types of websites are riddled with nasties?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] random65837@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The time to ditch DDG came when they started gatekeeping during the first Russia thing, COVID, etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›