Losing 700,000 customers in 3 months seems pretty bad.
Television
Could be but I feel like we lack context. 700,000 is a number but large or small depends on what we're comparing it to.
Update: just read the article and no real numbers are given. I feel like that's typical for wired? Not sure, but I don't remember reading a wired article and ever saying "I feel confident enough to have a data based opinion regarding this subject"
If that's a net loss, and it appears to be, that's really bad.
That's definitely fair, do you by chance have the total number of subscribers?
I don't, but I'm not sure they're releasing those numbers. The reason I assume a net loss is a quote from the article.
Max’s subscribers have been “relatively flat” for nearly a year, and the service also lost subscribers in the quarter previous to this one.