this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
1078 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2142 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukraine needs all the air defense they can get. Russia has been signaling they will try again to freeze the civilian population this winter.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (65 children)

If we'd shift funds from Israel (who are committing genocide) to Ukraine (who are defending themselves) it helps Palestine and hurts Russia too.

Is a win/win.

Imagine if Ukraine had the iron dome America bought Israel.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Imagine if Ukraine had the iron dome America bought Israel.

I know your heart is in the right place but ID barely covers a city and operating costs are extremely high. Right now the missiles that the ID system uses cost something around $1,000,000 each so defending just this latest bombing run would have been $90,000,000 USD.

No one could afford to operate the system even if it could be built.

[–] LaLiLuLuCo@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

ID interceptor missiles are more like $50k-150k a piece, but multiple are fired during each interception to increase chances of a successful hit. The amount fired already since the 7th is still probably in the $1-2 billion range if you estimate conservatively.

Iron Knife and Iron Beam are much cheaper per shot (~$4 and $2500 respectively) but are developed by Israel itself in collaboration with US military industrial contractors. The Gaza war is a giant live fire test for them and countries including the US and India are lining up to buy them.

Iron Dome as a whole thing array also includes David's Sling and the Arrows which cover different type of attacks. I. E. Cruise and ballistic missiles amongst other things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Israel doesn't actually need American money, unfortunately. Sure, it helps them, but they can continue this campaign for a long time without a dollar from the U.S. Ukraine, on the other hand, is a much more desperate situation. I'm not saying that means we shouldn't shift funds from Israel to Ukraine, because I agree we should do that, but it will likely not help Palestinians much.

load more comments (63 replies)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 106 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Looks like it's all going according to Putin's plan.

I'm the last guy to put on a tinfoil hat, but the whole situation seems like it was engineered by Russia to take pressure off their war with the Ukraine.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd say it's simpler than that. Russia keeps funding regions it wants destabilized so something bad is always happening at a time good for Russia.

No tinfoil hat, but total Scumbag Putin.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

More likely an opportune moment for Putin. The Gaza conflict seems to have been primarily stoked by Iran over concerns of growing positive Israel and Saudi Arabia relations

load more comments (2 replies)

There was no real indication for the scope and intensity of the hamas attacks. Based on US and Israeli Intel. There were some kind of warning signs, but nothing pointing to this ferocity. I think fighters got far further than they could dream of, and the severity of the response is a direct reaction to the failure of the isreali army to see and stop the attack. It's difficult to believe that the kremlin had more and better information to know that an attack would lead to war on the scale we see today. And I'm willing to believe that Russia sees benefits in arming hamas through the lens of geopolitics, they aren't controlling the actions of hamas in any meaningful way, I certainly don't believe that.

Putin is just taking advantage and is absolutely never harmed by being seen as some kind of geopolitical mastermind. He isn't.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Take the pressure off to help optics but also to squeeze any western support

[–] Littleborat@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They said that the Hamas attack took at least one year to plan, maybe 18 months. Putin thought he would win the war on Ukraine quickly.

So I have my doubts that this was perfectly orchestrated to take attention away at the right time.

Russia and Iran's strategy is more likely loosely aligned.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MrFlamey@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Fuck Putin, the warmongering cunt. I hope Ukraine continues to get Western support and can kick Russia out of their country, however slim the chances might be looking right now. Russia extending its influence and things gradually going back to business as usual, only for them to do it again in another 10 years won't be good for any Western democracies.

Haven't really been following the Israel/Palestine thing much to be honest, but it would be nice if people would stop killing one another. Also really sucks that it benefits Putin.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I truly feel like if we let Russia get anything that might count as a positive for them from this war, there will definitely be a new war of at least similar scale, but probably significantly worse and significantly less contained.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We let Hitler take shit and it didn't end well, the repurcussions of that are at war today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The chances aren't as slim as many people seem to imagine. Putin is basically in a holding pattern for now. He's holding out on the chance that Trump might win a second term, thus changing everything about the current dynamic. If Trump doesn't win, Putin is probably in pretty big trouble since he almost certainly won't survive a defeat in Ukraine and will be hard-pressed to find a good exit that doesn't look like one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] acidagfc@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense, UN can only produce a finite amount of concern, not enough to express it on 2 major conflicts.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

UN doing absolutely diddly in two major theaters of conflict rather than just the one.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UN's role is to prevent conflict between major powers, not stop all war period. It has done an exemplary job at that, better than any organization in history. There have been no wars between major world powers in the past 75 years. Prior to that, all empires were constantly at each other's throats.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

idk how much of that really is the UN and how much can just be attributed to mutually assured destruction

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

At this point, pouring on the bombs (shortly after gloating that the new speaker in congress suits Russia) seems likely to be as much about shifting morale (getting Ukraine to worry that its support from the west will dry up with Kremlin toadies in control of Washington's purse strings) as it is about on-the-ground strategy or tactics.

It's not like new Israeli atrocities detracts significantly from the world's ability to pay attention to the atrocities in Ukraine, but anything that gives Moscow something else to gesture at gives it something to whatabout over, and getting the rest of the world (including nato members and US politicians) to fight amongst themselves (over whether it's better to back a genocidal ethnostate or the terrorists resisting it) is always a win when the alternative might be for them to unify against your invasion of Ukraine.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (44 children)

And still getting his ass kicked by civilian volunteers with drones.

Why don't the Russian people get rid of this asshole?

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's a little harder than you imagine Source: I'm Russian

[–] Zevlen@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ye, me too brother. People think 🤔 Russia is like easily changeable or something... I think people forget just how many Russians and other people Russians have killed and imprisoned since Russia began so to say. I think people don't understand that Russia never had a democracy... Ever. I don't think people get that it's not easy to live and survive in Russia no matter when and where...

Also it's as if people pretend not to know that if You protest 🪧 anything in Russia; you're fucked.

People also don't know that the policemen rape people / men in prison. They torture You and rape you. At anytime You can be put in an MMA style fight against an opponent who will brutalize You before You die of the physical injuries.

I don't think people understand that if the world doesn't help to establish a democracy in Russia that Russia will always ; always go back to its corrupt ways.

I don't think people understand that there are also Russians who've been totally brainwashed just the same way that people got / get brainwashed in states like China, north Korea and Nazi Germany ( in the passed ) , imperial Japan etc.

I don't think people get that its not easy to be the hero a martar or organize a rebellion when you're under a violent regime and when all you have is your small family or none at all

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
[–] AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

The world watching has never stopped him before.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is amazing how the news cycle dropped Ukraine so fast. Not good for getting US support, but I think Ukraine can still get support from Europe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can we please give the armed forces of Ukraine finally airplanes? The offensive is going nowhere if they are not supplied with an edge in combat gear.

[–] mifan@feddit.dk 33 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately it’s not that easy.

They have already got a large sum of F16’s, but it takes training of Ukrainian pilots before they can be used in combat.

From what I understand they should be ready to fly in early 2024. That still a long time to go - but you don’t want to lose pilots or planes because of inexperience with that type of airplane.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3-4 months until planned delivery of F16s

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The planes aren't what's taking time. The F-16s are either being used for training, which is totally unnecessary as that training takes place in the US, and we have a few hundred of the things pretty much just sitting around, or are on standby to be deployed. The training of the pilots is what's taking time. I suspect Putin knows he's about to lose air superiority, and this attack is a demonstration of that. He's using what little weapons he has left, while he still can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joker125@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a totally unforeseeable situation.

[–] RealPuyo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›