this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
147 points (83.6% liked)

politics

24583 readers
3614 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Muslim voters disillusioned with President Biden’s position on Israel are facing the prospect of a difficult choice in 2024.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 94 points 2 years ago (11 children)

No they don’t.

Same as everyone else, they can choose between a moderate and a fascist.

Everyone has issues they don’t want moderation on. That doesn’t mean they are stupid enough to back a person who explicitly says they want to ban them.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They can also just be less enthused and a few may not vote. They don't even need to decide not to vote - they can intend to, but with an additional logistical hurdle, it ceases to be something they do.

I'm not going to fight to vote if I think both candidates are happy to see me (and people like me) dead. And while Biden wrings his hands at the "jumanitarian" toll, it really looks like it's the political one that has his attention.

People will have legitimate feelings about that and we as Americans are not entitled to Muslims voting against Trump. Even if we desperately need it.

If we do desperately need it, we'll need to earn it.

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I just think voting for someone who called for a full and complete ban on your religion entering the country absolves anyone of taking your position seriously in the future.

[–] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

You say we as if “we” and Muslims are separate. We are all the same. We don’t have to earn Muslim votes. Our party needs to earn all of our votes. Just because they have a specific issue in world politics right now doesn’t make them any different than so many sub groups within the democrat party.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is all media-manufactured crisis. Same as “Democrats are in deep trouble. Republicans will win in a landslide in 2022 elections”.

The choice every American is facing is:

  1. Functioning government with compromises to overcome a difficult situation

OR

  1. Full blown fascism and end of democracy.

Any republican win will be the last fair election we will ever see in this country before turning into Russia-style elections farce. Take a look at what republicans are doing in Ohio and Virginia ahead of next week’s elections.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 15 points 2 years ago

This is all media-manufactured crisis. Same as “Democrats are in deep trouble. Republicans will win in a landslide in 2022 elections”.

I agree with you in this case, but in all fairness, based on past cycles, Democrats were likely to be in trouble at that particular time. If not for the actions of grassroots orgs in individual states working really hard on shoestring budgets, the DNC would have totally flubbed it.

They stand upon the shoulders of those who really care and see the existential threat we face. If we can survive this, the DNC's days are numbered, too.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Lol, the guy who literally instituted the Muslim ban or the guy who actually talks about being concerned for Gaza Human Rights and just doesn't want to lose the Jewish vote. Golly, tough call 🙄

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Voting for Trump shouldn't even be an option at this point, it's just ridiculous

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I understand and sympathize with their disappointment, but voting Republican would be even worse. The issue at hand is that both parties are pro-Israel.

It would be nice if the Democratic party wasn't simply the "less bad" choice for Muslims (and various POC) on some policies.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think the loudest proPalestine voices are Democratic. That in and of itself offers at least some choice on the matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iBaz@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You mean the same Trump that wants to try again to institute a Muslim ban? Head of the party that wants to deport Palestinian people? The same guy that has 4 indictments and like 98 felony counts? We have a real constitutional crisis on our hands and if the GOP gets control again, they will NEVER relinquish it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

The guy who wants to send brown people "back where they came from" vs the old Guy that actually seems to like brown and black folks, I'm not really seeing where they would possibly be disillusioned, but hey, a lot of people seem to be terminally stupid, and most of those stupid people like to tell us who they are by their red MAGA hats and shitty bumper stickers.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It’s a two horse race and no one can say that voting Republican will help Palestinians. If people vote for a protest against Biden then their vote is lost and the Republicans have a win. The same if people decide that they won’t vote. It’s still a win for the Republicans.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] S_204@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

LoL.... Biden, the guy who's supportive of pretty much all middle eastern countries that aren't maniacal death cults, or Trump who literally banned all Muslims from America.

Do y'all think Trump would deport them all to Gaza or to Geneva by mistake?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (17 children)

If anyone aside from white upper class males vote for trump, they're certifiably a moron.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Calling them a moron might feel good but it doesn't really get us any closer to keeping Trump out of the white house. He won once and I think it's definitely possible he could win again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because turnp has had a stellar relationship with minorities in the past.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Remember the forced hysterectomies hosted at the southern border during his years?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

im sure they'll love the two right wing supreme court justices that are likely to come up in the next four years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Yeah, super difficult. An imperfect candidate or a batshit crazy fascist. Whatever should we do, it's a real Sophie's choice.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] dx1@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Genocidal" vs. "extremely genocidal". Gotta love America.

Maybe the DNC should just run someone who isn't complicit in a genocide. Problem solved.

[–] DontMakeItTim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can’t vote for or against them now anyway. Maybe give it a year and see where things stand then?

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A year is an eternity in politics

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Yet the Republican candidate facing Biden at this stage seems likely to be former President Trump, who famously issued a travel ban on predominantly Muslim nations in his first days in office.

Ameerah Al-Zahrani, a Pittsburgh, Pa. voter who is Muslim, said she feels “extremely discouraged” about the 2024 election and is considering a vote for Cornel West, the Harvard professor and longtime critic of Israel who is challenging Biden from the left.

In a memo released Thursday, Biden campaign manager Julie Chávez Rodriguez said her team feels “well-prepared to defeat whoever emerges from the extreme MAGA Republicans’ primary field,” but “this will be a very close general election.”

Besides the Muslim travel ban policy, Trump also made the controversial move to relocate the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and declare it Israel’s capital, which infuriated Arabs in the region.

Alawieh noted that on the ground in Michigan, the Republican party is working hard to attract Muslims who may align with the GOP on wedge social issues.

“But I think they have been putting a fair amount of work and in a moment like this, the president’s failure to call for a cease-fire that saves the lives of Palestinian children is exactly the kind of thing that has the potential to open the flood gates of people abandoning the long streak of supporting Democrats.”


The original article contains 1,084 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›