this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35727 readers
974 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They don’t have a brain really and kinda just float there. Do they even feel pain?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robotdna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

After having kept jellyfish as pets (Atlantic bay nettles), I wouldn't really consider them to be vegetarian nor vegan. While similar to plants, seemed to have a greater sense of environmental awareness than my plants. Mine could sense light, have "off days", and interact with their environment. It's probably true that there's not much going on there due to the small amount of nerves that control everything, but even when mine would accidentally get caught on tank cleaning tools or get bumped around they'd react in a protective way and to me it's just similar enough to animalistic behavior that I'd not feel comfortable consuming them if I were vegan.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] GayPunkRock@the.coolest.zone 1 points 1 year ago

would u even get anything out of eating it tho?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

No Brain? For Jellyfish, No Problem

“I think sometimes people use its lack of a brain to treat a jellyfish in ways we wouldn’t treat another animal,” Helm says. “There are robots in South Korea that drag around the bay and suck in jellyfish and shred them alive. I’m a biologist and sometimes sacrifice animals, but I try to be humane about it. We don’t know what they are feeling, but they certainly have aversion to things that cause them harm; try to snip a tentacle and they will swim away very vigorously. Sure, they don’t have brains, but I don’t think that is an excuse to put them through a blender.”

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They're animals, so no.

[–] MrPeach4tlanta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

They have no brain but aren't they like almost entirely nervous system? That's all you need to feel pain; the brain just makes it more complicated than "ouch, move away from that."

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I found a couple of articles on this:

No.”

it’s complicated.”

[–] FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Jellyfish eat animals and animal byproducts, so no, they are not vegan.

Jokes aside, often vegans follow dietary restrictions for reasons other than an ethical or moral belief against causing pain. Many vegans don't even eat honey, so I imagine jellyfish is pretty safely in non-vegan territory.

[–] hardware26@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I thought your first sentence was serious at first, since it genuinely makes sense to me. If growing a jellyfish causes animal suffering, I can see why a vegan may reject to eat it for ethical reasons.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are carnivores plants vegan? Genuinely curious, never looked into it.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Plants aren't sentient, so yes.

[–] moog@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they feel pain, communicate, reproduce, move around, why are plants any different than animals? honest question

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Plants may react to damage, but that isn't the same thing as pain. Plants don't have a brain or a central nervous system.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)

At this time it is impossible to know if they feel pain. They're a living creature.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We may be able to tell if they are stressed, which could be related to pain, depending on your viewpoint.

Here is a recent study of audible reactions plant can have to stress: https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(23)00262-3

Do plants react to stress and harmful situations like infestation? Absolutely. Do they actually feel pain as we understand it? Probably not since they lack a nervous system.

This boils down to the question: What is pain?

[–] marmo7ade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pain is reaction to stimuli. One of those reactions can be suffering, if we assume lobsters and dandelions, who have wildly different biology, experience and perceive reality in the same way humans do. There is no evidence that they do. A belief in something without evidence is called religion.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] reality_boy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Vegan is a very wide array of things ranging to not eating red meat all the way down to not doing anything that could hurt a plant (only scavengering fallen fruit).

https://theminimalistvegan.com/types-of-vegans-and-vegetarians/

[–] db2@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget the ecosexuals.

I'm not making that up, it's apparently a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrummyB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is not at all what Veganism is.

Veganism is LITERALLY an ethical stance regarding exploiting/harming/killing non-human animals.

Finding a random blog online that states otherwise means nothing. Anyone who ate a salad last Tuesday these days thinks they can simply decide what Veganism is.

THIS is the actual definition of Veganism, directly from the people who coined the term:

“Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

jains are considered vegans but vegans don't have the same considerations. a vegan is simply somebody who avoids consuming any animal product including leather, honey, wool &c

[–] pinwurm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on the definition of Veganism.

There’s is a popular school of thought that the diet‘s sole purpose to reduce suffering. If a living thing has no central nervous system (or brain), it has no thoughts and cannot experience pain or harm. It’s not much different than a fruit or vegetable. I know vegans that make exceptions for oysters - for example.

Others schools of thought are about avoiding animal products altogether, it doesn’t matter if it suffers or not - there’s no way to know. Therefore, it’s immoral to eat them if you can knowingly choose an alternative.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There’s is a popular school of thought that the diet‘s sole purpose to reduce suffering. If a living thing has no central nervous system (or brain), it has no thoughts and cannot experience pain or harm.

What about instant death? Like a farmer putting down a well-treated cow with a bullet to the head. In this scenario, the cow never suffered. In all likelihood it probably never even had much mental distress, let alone fear of death. Would that meat be ethical/vegan friendly?

[–] SQL_InjectMe@partizle.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Replace cow with human and see if it passes the test.

Is it ethical to give a human a scarf? Yes. Well it's also ethical to give a cow a scarf.

Is it ethical to shoot a human in the head? No? Well it's also unethical to shoot a cow in the head.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I value every other species as worth less than a human and therefore they have different ethical considerations.

But, far down are you willing to go? How small? Rabbits? Rats, mice? Insects? Is squishing a spider ethically identical as murdering some one? I would say no, what would you say? There is a line, be it soft or hard, somewhere.

[–] pinwurm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Suffering is a broad definition. One would argue that prematurely ending sentient life without their consent would fit that definition.

Often, it’s not suffering on an individual level - but the suffering of a species. Cows live in bondage and we benefit from their labor and chose to end their lives for our benefit.

Sometimes Vegans extend this philosophy to pets and service animals - even if they’re treated exceptionally well.

The point is that Veganism is less monolithic than folks tend to believe. A person’s diet can be deeply personal and it’s up to them to draw lines.

I’m a meat eater. I don’t have an issue eating cows. I don’t have an issue eating rabbits, which I know people also keep as pets. I don’t have an issue eating lobster - whereas they’re boiled alive. But I know I couldn’t eat a cat or dog. Realistically, I have trouble with veal. So ya know, where I draw the line might not be the same for other people. My diet is informed by my culture, health, experiences and personal feelings - as is everyone’s.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe that it is not, since scientifically it is an animal. However, some vegetarians (not vegans) will eat fish or certain animal products.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I thought that people who would eat fish but not other animals were pescatarians.

load more comments
view more: next ›