this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
535 points (95.9% liked)

News

23268 readers
2585 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A year after he bought Twitter for $44 billion, Musk thinks the company is now worth $19 billion, a 55 percent drop.

Let's recap what he did to Twitter, I will go first:

  • Changed the original name Twitter to X.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is anyone else surprised it's even worth that much?

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago (11 children)

A lot of journalists, politicians and influencers are really reluctant to let it go. I guess those are the ones still keeping it somewhat afloat.

It should be more publicly shamed if you keep being a part of his insanity.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. I mean in the end it has no product. It's just billboard/ad space, in the world of commerce. Sure, it's a lot of ad space, but ad space in the digital world is also effectively endless, so the percentage still isn't actually that relevant as it can shift in a moment's notice.

Say... if a neonazi buys the platform and brings all his friends with him.

But beyond an office he's not even paying for and so on, Xitter got... nothing. They have no actual product that can be liquidated, no supply chains worth any money, nothing to rent/sell out beyond said adspace. Like many digital companies they rely entirely on hype for all their perceived value.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure it’s worth fuck all.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It was never about the money. Musk is turning a once-valuable information space into a fascist shithole. That was always the goal.

[–] MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't believe that. Turning it into a fascist shit hole might have been a goal, but losing billions doing it isn't.

He's an arrogant fuck who wants everyone to believe he's a genius. Blowing that much money makes him look like a moron.

[–] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is rich enough that it literally doesn't matter. This was "expensive" for him on paper, but hardly life changing.

[–] xts@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah it’s definitely life changing. The public sentiment over the last couple of years has gone from

“wow Elon musk is a genius who will electrify the world and get us to mars”

to

“Wow Elon Musk is a massive moron who clearly isn’t anywhere near as smart as he thinks he is”

and the more he spreads right wing conspiracy shit the worse it’s getting for him.

Let’s not even talk about the public image but the private one now- he borrowed something like $20b? from several banks to make the deal who are now saddled with the debt. They have also been discussing (publicly) selling it at a loss because they’re done with Elon. Other banks will not lend him money, ESPECIALLY with interest rates being what they are and what he’s done this last year. The time of free money (which is how he built all of his companies) and unlimited government subsidies is done and that’s the only way he’s been successful- when there’s virtually no risk.

He cannot pay his interest payments because he’s only rich on paper. He’s likely cash poor and hasn’t even been paying normal Twitter bills let alone interest payments for his $20b loan, which IIRC gains like a billion in interest every year. Dude dug himself into a hole with no way out

[–] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like he's only a constitutional amendment away from being President of The US.

[–] xts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

lol that would never happen, the GOP would NEVER allow anyone but natural born citizens to serve

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I mean he's a white male, for them he's more American than most of the country.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Both of you to assume they wouldn't change the rules to serve their purpose before changing it right back, if they even bothered at all.

This still makes him look like a moron and his image is really important to him.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once valuable? Fuck that. Twitter has always been and always will be Jerry Springer for the Internet. It's fun to watch some toothless hooker throw a shoe at a priest until Grandma finds out you are on their as 4chan gaslighting the priest and the hooker.

The value is pure entertainment. Anyone that takes it more seriously has not seen it for what it is.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why it bothers me that so many government agencies and officials use it to communicate with the public.

It’s almost as if there should be an official government service / platform specifically for that purpose. A state run Twitter. (Maybe they could use mastodon under the hood.)

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If I recall correctly, some EU government bodies are doing just that! They host their own Mastodon instance.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's obscene that someone can destroy so much value and not go bankrupt. It should not be possible.

[–] alcamtar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The value only exists on paper. He halved it, he can double it. Happens all the time.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

he can double it.

You must be buying all the shares you can then!

Narrator: he wasn't

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

he can double it

Can he, though? Or was the worth inflated beforehand?

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

He absolutely paid an inflated price. It was hovering around $40/share before he put in the offer of $54/share. So he and the other investors overpaid by quite a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Let's put this another way.

That ~25 billion, heavily absorbed by foreign investors, has bought influence on worldwide events/elections and allowed those that previously hated the platform to sabotage it internally, likely to a post-election failure.

Makes you wonder to what degree we have a "useful idiot billionaire" situation, with other interests (countries?) steering the out of control train to their benefit.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sure the value will come back. Valuing X at $19B puts the value of the whole alphabet at $500B, which seems low for an established technology which has been in continuous use since before the time of the Roman Empire.

The US GDP is $24 trillion, and all the financial reports supporting that valuation use the Roman Alphabet. The Alphabet is essential to justifying the value of the entire US Economy. I think it's reasonable to value the worth of the alphabet at 8% of GDP, which would give X a fair value of $74B.

See, haters? Elon really is a financial genius. Numbers don't lie.

[–] Throwaway@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, Alphabet is currently valued at 1.56 trillion dollars.

https://g.co/kgs/Tchkeb

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Wow X, you suck: Pull your weight! Look at how much the other letters are worth!

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 7 points 1 year ago

Come on. Obviously not all letters in the alphabet are worth the same. X is not that popular even if you take into account its different uses like ':x', 'xoxo' or 'xxx'. Not that many words use x and if one day it collapses and becomes unavailable you can just substitute it with 'ks' like 'seks' or 'meksican'.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The meat of those financial reports rely on Arabic Numerals and everything is OK over there, right?

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You forgot quite a significant thing when it comes to Twitter's devalutation. Musk delisted Twitter on Nov 8 as part of his acquisition. The worth of a private company is a bit more difficult to figure out compared to the worth of a public company.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the value he think it's worth, not what someone would actually pay for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don't think it was even worth half of what he paid for it when he paid for it. Musk is a complete god damned moron. I'd be surprised if the company was even worth $19 billion when he bought it for $44 bn. And there's no way in fuck that it's worth $19 bn now. Absolute dogshit assessment. Not that I'm surprised, mind. It's Musk's assessment, after all.

[–] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He could have just donated all of that to the Signal foundation if he wanted to protect free speech.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's about the attention. Narcissism.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I just read the news somewhere that they introduced two payment tiers for monthly subscription. Good luck keeping users. There's not a single social network that charges people use. No matter how cheap.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Many of his decisions have not been good.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 year ago

It was never worth what he paid for it, and his "enlightened" changes have only made things worse in terms of value.

One big thing that must be bad for advertisers is that generally, even people without a Twitter account (I've never had one) generally needed to view posts from some businesses or services. So they still had people coming by and serving ads to them without an account.

But now that you cannot even see comments on a tweet and if you're somehow able to get to a list of tweets (it usually just forces you to the login screen) you cannot get ANY useful order from it when not logged in.

Believe it or not, I think the majority of people won't create an account with a gun to their head like this. As such, the advert revenue is already down from people like me.

Furthermore, though, I suspect businesses will eventually work out that Twitter is no longer a suitable bullhorn to use to deliver promotion information or to offer customer service, and will start to move away. That's not going to help Twitter or their advertisers out either.

But, I don't think he ever planned to make it profitable. I think this weird anarchy he's iteratively implementing was what he decided to do, as soon as he was forced to finish the acquisition.

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many times will they reuse this image where his jaw is doing something super weird? This time it's gotten some fancy graphics but it's the same flipping image. I must have seen it on 10 different articles.

[–] xts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably his fillers shifting around so you might as well make fun of him, for that and his ass to head hair transplant.

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not saying you shouldn't make fun of him. Just tired of seeing the same photo on every Musk-critical article.

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Act like a child and you get a toy, Elon.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

At Elon Used Auto, they are slashing prices below 50%. Don't delay, come in today and get free undercoating.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is the curve linear?

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't even know where to begin on twitter, never really got into it.

load more comments
view more: next ›