this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

blatant racism, voter suppression, and election rigging.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Funny how you're claiming it's actually everyone else who's racist when you immediately think of race when people talk about convicted felons.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Understanding demographics is not racist. Black men are convicted and incarcerated more often than anyone else in this country because our justice system is weighted against them.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not when you understand the disproportionate incarceration of black people for the same crimes. Like how the war on drugs made lot of drug crimes felonies with the intention of disenfranchising the black population through unequal enforcement. Plus Jim Crow laws and everything else that disproportionately punishes black folks based on criminal history.

Understanding history is why we know racism is a major component of anything that removes the right to vote.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Understanding history is why we know racism is a major component of anything that removes the right to vote.

More like you're just grasping at straws to connect entirely disconnected events since you have no actual position to argue from an honest perspective

[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

u/MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works

Your bigotry is not welcome here.

[–] Creyapnilla@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Confidence: LVL 50

Intelligence: LVL 0

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good. Criminals deserve less

[–] pakrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You do realize, this is a classic Jim Crow technique to surpress votes from those you don't want to vote. For exampl, you could make it a felony to be late for a rent but then the county only choses to prosecute people of color, but gives "grace" to white tenants.

I'm guessing they do realize it, hence the fervent support of the practice.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They also chose crimes that can be pinned on black people whether or not they did them.

For example, drugs. Want to take out a black person that's "causing trouble?" Just arrest them and conveniently find drugs in their house. Maybe the person really knows that you planted them, but who's the white judge going to believe? The black man or the white police officer? The black man is now a convicted felon, behind bars. Even if he's released, he still can't vote anymore.

Repeat a few dozen more times and you can stop black people from "causing trouble" just with the constant threat of arrest hanging over their heads.

[–] Creyapnilla@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You might need to dumb it down a bit further 😅

[–] Vinegar@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Careful, there's very little that separates you from those you wish to disenfranchise.

You might want to check out Anthony Ray Hinton's The Sun Does Shine for a memoir of what it's like to be wrongfully sentenced to prison for nearly 30 years all because your friend was mad at you over a girl.

There's also the case of Crystal Mason who's in prison, right now, despite comitting no crime.

Profit and Punishment: How America Criminalizes the Poor in the Name of Justice by Pulitzer prize winner Tony Messenger is a more comprehensive book, but one that I think every US citizen should read before defending the status quo.

Criminal justice reform is extraordinarily difficult in the US because citizens with first hand experience are disenfranchised. Everyone affected by society should have an equitable voice in society - there should be no disenfranchised underclass.

[–] Agareth@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago