this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
545 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58224 readers
3854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 166 points 11 months ago (3 children)

And it fucking blows now. You don't get shit but ads.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago (6 children)

They’re somehow WORSE than duckduckgo nowadays like how? You were the search leader, people used DDG for privacy reasons but they passed you??? Did you forget why you’re a company? It’s because you were the best fucking search engine ever and you decided to sell that title for ads or some shit. Incredible how Google fell off the fucking side of a mountain they themselves built!

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Yes, but have you considered, line must go up?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

For me it went from "great" to "usable" over the course of a decade or so, and then from "usable" to "worthless" over the course of six months. It's a remarkably awful trajectory.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

And DuckDuckGo lacks basic stuff such as keyword exclusion. (It's my main search engine for the last few years after Startpage got bought, but lacking keyword exclusion sucks!)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Is ddg actually good now? I remember it feeling nearly useless waay back when it was first hitting the scene. Might have to give it a shot again

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

I'm not a power user, but I've used DDG exclusively for a while now and I often forget that I'm using it. I'd say it's a pretty seamless transition nowadays.

[–] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You actually get the results you are looking for without the sponsored links. Sometimes you end up searching for reddit results but that's every search engine.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Not kagi. I haven’t specified Reddit once since switching to kagi. It really is that much better than DDG and Google.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I only use Google if DDG can't find what I'm looking for. Usually Google doesn't either if DDG can't so lately I've been giving up after the DDG results. I can't stand Google anymore. The first page of results is just ads and the next page is all irrelevant nonsense.

[–] icedterminal@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It's pretty wild how Google search has degraded. The push for SEO has really ruined useful results.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kagi is even better than DDG. Google is absolutely horrendous.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It’s interesting, but $120 a year is just too much for me.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The lowest plan is only $54 a year and it’s most definitely worth it for the results.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

300 searches a month is just way too little for my usage

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's so bad, the auto predictions dont even make sense any more.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

the auto predictions always give me more words than i need, so i have to type normally, like it wasn't there, or select, hope it doesn't load, and delete the extra words

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And when i go to click on an auto prediction it changes it at the last damn second too. That drives me mad

[–] ourob@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is my beef with basically all modern interfaces. Stuff changes and moves with just enough of a delay to cause me to miss click. Autocomplete changing recommendations on phones, UI elements shifting on web pages, etc.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I thought i was getting old. I mean, i am, but this just enough delay miss-clicks make me feel even older

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

This has been something so frustrating that nobody seems to talk about. They really need to provide autofill that only adds the one next word, rather than two or three. Because otherwise, the autofill becomes useless.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Google doesn't work anymore.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Teknikal@lemm.ee 61 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I dunno on one side we have Google trying to wreck the entire internet and have their ads in your face 95 percent of the time.

On the other side is Microsoft who won't leave you the hell alone when pushing they're shit tiers programs and steal defaults on a weekly basis.

To me the only solution is ruling both companies monopolys and fining them to hell and breaking them up. Both are out of control and ruining computing and the Internet.

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Google could be broken up into

  • search
  • chrome / gsuite
  • YouTube
  • gcloud
  • ads
  • android. And I'm sure more

MS

  • windows / office
  • azure
  • xbox
  • bing
    ..I'm too tired to keep going lol

If those had to all survive independently and couldn't leech off profits of the parent organization we could have true competition. Instead you just need one super-profitable arm of a company than loss-lead your way into other verticals and out-compete everyone else because you don't have to turn a profit, at least while the competition is still clinging on.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They're also a core component of how YouTube makes money.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

Ads are what Google makes money with. That's their core business. I would argue most of what they offer is just a different way of either delivering you ads or farming your data for...ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And in the meantime, become a farmer! /s (you'd still have John Deere problems...)

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 58 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They should have invested in their potential, their search engines. It's getting shittier almost daily.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Makes you wonder if they just stopped paying they'd have 23 billion more and I wonder what they'd lose in market share. If it is less than 23 bil it makes sense to just not pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bing seems a lot worse now than before the pandemic as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

*To stifle competition FTFY

[–] roo@lemmy.one 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Relying on people's apathy is a business model with eras of success. Most people have never changed a setting other than dark mode, and even then that's probably your average superuser.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

you are actually onto something. When Neeva went under, they were a paid search engine, they made a post explain why. The hardest part was getting people to pay a monthly sub, but getting them to change the settings

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 34 points 11 months ago

Crazy that it's cheaper to do that than it is to build a product that can find recipe blogs that aren't also novels.

[–] Luft@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago

This validates my stubborn commitment to DuckDuckGo, ty

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 23 points 11 months ago

Hopefully the antitrust trial will end up telling Google they cannot pay anybody for preference of their browser. That would be the best outcome.

The MO of current "market leaders" is not to compete but gatekeep.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I'd gladly switch back to Google if they paid me a million dollars.

[–] yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

how is that not anti-competitive behaviour?

[–] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Antitrust was just a nice idea. It's kinda dead. Will remain dead unless we can purge corruption from politics. For some reason, most politicians seem averse to this idea.

Luckily the party driven and heavily influential political roles are filled with diverse representatives from every walk of life and aren't largely built around the same support circles and ideals that have already been entrenched for generations. With millions of citizens, its normal for the same handful of families to remain in power, with the exception of some rich celebrities who can win the popularity polls.

Everything is fine.

As long as the rich can get more money. That's what is most important.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You forgot to put “for some reason” in italics for extra sarcasm

[–] heygooberman@lemmy.today 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It isn't the default search engine on my browser. I'm using Kagi at the moment.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ioslife@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago

Paid, ad-free, privacy focused search engine

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

When you installed the browser and typed something other than a web address in the big white bar on the top, where did it go?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Even if it’s easy to switch browsers or platforms or search engines, the one that appears when you turn it on matters a lot.

Google obviously agrees and has paid a staggering amount to make sure it is the default: testimony in the trial revealed that Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine in multiple browsers, phones, and platforms.

It was made public after a debate earlier in the week between the two sides and Judge Amit Mehta over whether the figure should be redacted.

(Apple’s outsize percentage of the total is why that particular deal has been such a focus of the first weeks of the trial.)

Until now, these numbers have been closely held secrets, leaving competitors and analysts to speculate about exactly what it’s worth to Google to be the near-universal default choice.

He also said that he sees Yelp and Amazon as competitors and that, in such a hot market, Google has to do everything it can to stay relevant and compete.


The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

That's called innovation in capitalism.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Approximately 16% of their revenue or 29% of their profit. I'd take that tradeoff any day.

load more comments
view more: next ›