this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
420 points (100.0% liked)

196

16410 readers
1371 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 53 points 1 year ago

Sounds like someone is failing upwards.

[–] madeline@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is the top right one? i recognize the xbox one logo but i have no idea about that one.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I remember it took Fooooreveeer for quality titles to come out. Plus, in my opinion The PS2 Was such a juggernaut that the PS3 had way too many expectations for what a PS2 successor should be.

Overall, wasn’t THAT bad all things considered. It got Blue Ray to beat out HD DVD which lets be honest, was Sony’s main reason for releasing the console.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Too young to remember but I do know the original PS3 was marketed more as a multimedia device, and started at $499 in 2006, which is over $750 today. That probably gave the Xbox 360 a boost. However the PS3 is likely viewed more favorably today since the slim model was much cheaper and marketed as a gaming console rather than multimedia, whereas Microsoft had the Red Ring of Death to deal with before they went down the Multimedia marketing path, which culminated in the Xbox One launch, also pictured.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At the time, the PS3 was the cheapest bluray player out there when it launched. Also, this is andetodical, but my university had a cluster of PS3s booted into Linux to be used for Machine Learning, as it was the most affordable higher end GPUs you could get at the time. I'm surprised people think the PS3 was bad, but I guess from a business perspective, selling hardware at a loss expecting to make it up in game sales probably didn't work out as well as execs hoped, because the PS3 had more capabilities than just playing games. I'd guess there's a sizeable number of PS3 consoles which were purchased without ever buying a game to go along with it.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, until Sony were their usual dickbag selves and destroyed OtherOS functionality with a software update.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This kinda highlights the multimedia thing I mentioned. They packed so many things into the original PS3 that the average consumer was either overwhelmed or simply couldn't afford it.

The PS3 wasn't bad, in fact it was the objectively better console, it was jusg so expensive to produce that the average consumer couldn't buy it or simply didn't need all of its capabilities.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

The ps3 was closer to 600 dollars then. Which is of course an even worse price. In addition, Xbox had a huge online lead. Xbox live was good during the original Xbox (nicer than the PS2's online service) it got better with the Xbox 360 and Sony was left trying to catch up in a time when online games really took off.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol no one cares about rrod. It sucked for the first year of 360 buyers, they all got new consoles and that was basically that.

Xbox 360 was fairly dominant compared to the PS3 everywhere but Japan, and it's a testament to the failure of Xbox leadership at the time how much the One launch flipped the tables.

Launching an always online, living room webcam / microphone in the wake of the Edward Snowden revelations was wildly bad timing, on top of a lot of poor decisions to focus too much on tv and entertainment instead of gaming and you ended up with a gamer revolt. Then you had the utterly absurd failed launch of their core franchise on the console, which just hammered home their lack of focus on gaming, and it was never going to recover.

[–] Beefytootz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I was in highschool when the PS3 and 360 were in their prime. It was almost like the console wars part 2, but it was a cold social war. A lot of people had one or the other, but rarely both. What console you had heavily decided who your friends were. Depending on who was in your halo party, or fragging out in COD, or co-oping through borderlands 2. That was your crew. You spent hours with them and it really changed how strong some bonds were more than people realized. The PS3 had a somewhat luxury feel to it, while the 360 was more cool, I particularly liked the blade UI. The PS3 was perfectly fine, but it was pricier and therefore less popular amongst middle/lower class families. I worked at the time and saved up for both. My core group of friends played PlayStation, so that's what I rocked for online games and as my primary. My 360 was jtagged with a rgh and I yanked out the disc drive and replaced it with a bigger hard drive. That was solely for pirated solo games and exclusives. Good times. The following generation I was strictly PS4 until switching to PC full time

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FIVE HUNDRED AND NINTY NINE US DOLLARS

Back in 2006 too. OOF

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing he wasn't with Nintendo during the Wii U phase, they might have gone under

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering Nintendo basically has an uncle scrooge money vault, that would've been quite an achievement.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nintendo was founded in the 1890s, they have infinite coffers

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

The Wii made so much money they could lose cash for a hundred years and still be okay.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

What are the other two besides Stadia and what is the history behind them?

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like the deep v. You know that head and chest are smooth. You could slide right down to that pp without to touching a follicle I bet.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

If he gets hired again they deserve everything they get.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which one is the Xbox one?

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Xbox one is the Xbox One

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Aka the xbone