this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
59 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59626 readers
3064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is the correct response. Either everyone has protection or no one has. Not that I'd trust apple anyway but by pulling the service your average person is likely to make some noise because they can feel the effect.

[–] hardypart@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not even an Apple user but somehow I still feel like Apple is one of the very last companies where privacy and the security of your data is more worth than a dime.

[–] zettajon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Nope, Apple sells your data just as much as Google does: https://www.insiderintelligence.com/content/apple-ad-revenues-skyrocket-amid-its-privacy-changes https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/12/22/23513061/apple-iphone-app-store-ads-privacy-antitrust#luMMel

While people noticed their new policies against 3rd party apps, that masked the fact that those policies carved out an exception for first party apps, meaning they collect (anonymous) data on you through Health, Journal, Music, etc. just like every other company. "Trusting them more" is simply a result of you and everyone else getting hit with their privacy ads recently.

Edit: "just like every other company" meant Google and Microsoft, i.e. the other big equivalent tech companies, my fault for not being specific.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I’m all for calling out companies for abusing your privacy, your own links show that they don’t collect as much data as google. They could (and should) be better though.

[–] khajimak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope apple is literally worse than hitler, spez, and elon musk confirmed. Tim apple fucked my wife in front of me.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You lucky sonofabitch. You got to witness the ol Apple Pie with your own two eyes.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anonymous data is actually pretty different to the data everyone else collects, which literally has your name and picture

Apple’s data is useful for trends but it can’t be used to study who I am.

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This comment needs to be further up rather than the idiotic takes that don’t understand the difference between anonymized data collection (Apple) vs identifiable data collection (Meta/Google/most other tech).

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, then there's also the people that don't realize that there are all sorts of programs out there that will try to take that "anonymized" data and then tie it right back to a persons profile.

For example, you can anonymize GPS location data, but just because you strip away identifying information doesn't mean that you're truly anonymous. It can still be obvious where you live and where you work. And once you figure out where they live (again based on anonymous data) you can tie that information right back into their profile and continue to track them as if nothing has changed. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/security/a15927450/identify-individual-users-with-stravas-heatmap/

[–] Yendor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That won’t work on Apples data - they group all the data into cohorts, so the anonymising isn’t reversible.

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Not all anonymization techniques are created equal? I’m pretty sure this is fairly obvious at this point to anybody remotely familiar with how data collection works when it comes to privacy and device metrics.

So, how is this relevant to this conversation besides adding more FUD and misinformation?

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

As much as Google? Likely not. Does their carefully curated pro-privacy image actually match their practices? Also likely not.

[–] SidneyGrant@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like wuth the amount of stuff done on device and not in the cloud with iPhones and other Apple products, saying that Apple sells just as much as Google is at the very least disingenuous…

[–] IronCorgi@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Why? They gather data locally on your device rather than on a cloud service. Why do you feel the locality where they gather your data makes the comment disingenuous?

[–] Yendor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article you posted? Apple serve you ads, they don’t sell your data. And they allow you to opt out of tracking. It’s all right there in your article.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any company that obfuscates all their security practices, refuses to give statistics on security risks and counter measures, and boils their product security down to "Trust us, bro.", doesn't actually give a fuck about your security. They're just the last company who is still able to keeps everything secret so they can make shit up as they go along. Apple's security is a joke and they're just as bad as any other manufacturer on the market, the only difference is they have successfully kept their shit secret for all these years and spent decades convincing people they actually give a fuck about security.

I still remember a few years ago having a conversation with a coworker about her iphone and she bragged about Apple never being hacked and this was right after I had just got done reading an article about a large scale hack on their network. Of course Apple never said a damned thing about it, so I forwarded her the article. IIRC she mumbled something about how the article was probably not accurate. Apple fanatics do some crazy mental gymnastics to justify them spending thousands on a phone thats probably worth about $300 at best(their hardware is on average 1-2 generations behind other devices on the market).

Did you know that most celebrity phone hacks are thru apple accounts?

[–] SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple processors outperform flagship android phones on benchmarks every generation. Where are you getting your information?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sadly it’s tribalism. It’s “apple = bad” so anything mentioned about apple isn’t looked at logically but rather with an “us vs them” mentality. It’s common across the spectrum of thinking critically nowadays, but I felt I had to refute all points because it’s dumb and doesn’t help anyone.

More security is good. Hating on apple because they are convinced that it’s an overpriced conspiracy is stupid. Every tech company deserves some hate, Apple included, but making that your identity instead of thinking critical does nothing to advance the work being done.

[–] Dionysus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s legitimate criticism to be made for Apple, but this is something I really appreciate about them.

[–] TerraNova@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Walled garden aside, I think they do care about privacy and security.

[–] FlyLikeAMouse@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The incumbent government is circling the drain and are, it seems, determined to leave a trail of destruction and burned bridges for their successors to repair.

[–] MR_@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Then they can point how useless the government is and get back in power

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That is how conservative parties work, yes.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a lot of things to hate about Apple, but this I can get behind. Get people using 3rd party messaging apps too! Preferably ones with e2e encryption.

[–] gchap@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of people in the UK/Europe use third party apps already, iMessage is certainly less of a big deal than it is in the US.

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I live in germany and I don't know a single person that uses SMS or iMessage. Almost everyone here uses WhatsApp.

[–] phillycodehound@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago

WhatsApp isn't much better. It's owned by Meta afterall!

[–] Paws@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal and WhatsApp have also said they'd likely leave the UK market if this bill is passed as it currently is.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Signal should still work there if people want to use it, and they don't block it with a Great British Firewall.

[–] phillycodehound@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago

Good for Apple to take a stand.

[–] digdilem@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

As a UK citizen, I totally support this. The more that the average voter is disconvenienced because of proposed law changes like this and the (unenforcable) anti-porn laws, the more likely they are to actually pressure their MP or change how they vote.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apple would have to refactor their tools and potentially introduce security issues for everyone by doing this. If the UK government wants to be fucking dumb, it shouldn’t be something everyone has to pay the price for.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those proposals will never be made law and acted upon.

It's infeasible nonsense to pander to the Daily Mail reading curtain-twitchers. They've had 13 years to try and do this. If they wanted to (and indeed if it was in any way possible), they'd have done it already.

It'll be just "Vote for us and we'll make your children safe from nonces and muzzies!" until the end of time.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] t0lo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please no redditisms or else I will literally die of cringe o( ❛ᴗ❛ )o

[–] Froody@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Gatekeeping, another redditism. Perhaps you belong there after all?

[–] sol@thelemmy.club -1 points 1 year ago

this is advertising and should be removed