this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
1000 points (93.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1000
Well, this is something! (files.mastodon.social)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.de
 

Meanwhile in Germany:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Liska@feddit.de 180 points 1 year ago (34 children)

You are aware that this is over 5 years old data (2017!) for the German electricity mix, right?

Please don't get me wrong, the scale up of renewable energy sources is certainly not going fast enough in Germany (thanks to our conservative government that ruled the country for 16 years until 2021!), but please argue this position using the real data for 2023 (57.7% renewables in the German electricity mix)!

[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

You're right, I'm sorry. I chose the picture because it was the first okay one I found in English. I'll change it right away.

[–] gigachad@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

our conservative government that ruled the country for 16 years

and the next 16 years, if everything works well Ü

!please kill me!<

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

This is for sure fantastic, don't get me wrong, but Europe has also exported some of its most polluting industries abroad. And then we also wag our finger at places like China and India.

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 year ago (21 children)
[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 36 points 1 year ago

Italy isn't any less

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's no "unknown ", so that's good at least.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] kaffeeringe@feddit.de 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Schleswig-Holstein is at 100% wind since 2014. It's Southern Germany that lags behind. https://spd-geschichtswerkstatt.de/wiki/Energiewende

[–] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Alter, es ist immer mein reudiges Bayern, oder?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trollercoaster@feddit.de 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Lots of coal burning leads to a powerful coal lobby leads to lots of coal burning, it's the circle of life. All that's missing is coal entering the food chain, IMO we should bring back coal butter, so the country can depend on coal even more and the coal lobby can make even more profits.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn all these German tears in the comments could be used for enough hydro electricity to actually make the German grid cleaner.

[–] trollercoaster@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That wouldn't be long lived, though, because when implemented in the current German fashion, they won't be using salt water resistant equipment for cost cutting reasons and neglect all maintenance to cut even more costs. The tear powered hydroelectric plants will be rusted through and seized up in no time.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No it wouldn't. It would never be built because the FDP would block it and Söder would refuse to have it built in Bavaria and Merz would say something about immigrants using up all our German salt on the tax payers dime all day long and Sahra Wagenknecht would mention that we wouldn't need it if we were all good friends with Putin and the SPD would do nothing anyway and the AfD would blame the green party for not reactivating 45 year old reactors instead of building it,...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Meanwhile here next door in the Netherlands, we have wind farms and solar all over, and we sell our energy to the UK...meanwhile we have some of the highest consumer energy costs in the EU.

Consumers get screwed over here a lot.

[–] Taringano@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kind of selfish form you, aren't you thinking about the shareholders?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] occhineri@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since it says "right now", I doubt this listing is qualified for discussing the general state of the energy transition in these countries.

Edit: I checked it. Spain's gas share (as a random example) was significantly higher than 17% all over 2023 when summed up monthwise with wind contributing up to 30%.

Edit2: correct data for Germany for the same time mark: 52% fossil free (38% wind)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason Czechs use „mld.“ instead of „Mrd.“ like Germans for billions (miliardy/Milliarden) is because mrd means “fuck” (noun) in Czech.

[–] Magnetar@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those poor Czechs just cannot afford vowels.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We totally can! Look, my address is

Petr Zhltal
Strmý vrch 14 (čtrnáct)
Čtvrť zmrdů
Krnov 5 (pět) – Srch
ČR

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's very a good sign, but I do have doubts about those figures. It's all too easy to look at total demand and total renewable generation, while ignoring the fact that the country is a net exporter and thus produces more than 100% of its demand - with the remaining uncounted percentage not being green.

"Fossil free" isn't exactly a recognised term, either, in which case fossil free =/= net zero =/= completely green.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] carbonicnoodle@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Meanwhile in Germany: +13 GW new renewables so far this year...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gajustempus@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we may all say a big "THANK YOU!" to Philipp Rösler (FDP) and Peter Altmaier (CDU) for both destroying the German PV-industry, establishing the "Solar-Ausbaudeckel" and the CDU/CSU as a whole to block and hinder wind power for over a decade very effectively.

And their very hard work to make Germany overly dependent on fossil fuels, to keep it that way and therefore blow ALL climate goals appears to be a success model, as the CDU/CSU are currently winning the public opinion with that intend, whilst those trying to follow the steps of our european neighors are slammed into the ground (just as our PV industry).

In other words: Germans don't want clean air. They don't want a future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Climate impact by energy type in Europe can be monitored live on this site.

[–] Waker@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm Portuguese and as much as I'd love to run on 96% green energy I can't believe it... Last time I checked (it was quite a while ago I'll give them that) we imported a lot of nuclear energy from France. So unless France is 100% green and still has a green energy surplus (which it isn't/doesn't) we're just transfering our carbon footprint...

We do have a lot of wind turbines so maybe we don't import as much anymore but still...

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Nuclear is green though, so France is a good place to be importing from. It also has the lowest mortality rate per kWh of all power sources, Chernobyl included.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Meanwhile in my country, renewable energy sources are frowned upon and the government just announced plans to build 3 new coal powerplants.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Rational governments get that fossil fuels aren't going anywhere, coal and oil will stay just where they like they have for longer than humans have been a thing.

Capitalist societies tho... private companies own those fossil fuels rights and they want to sell as much as they can for as long as they can.

We should be planning centuries in advance, not a financial quarter at a time.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

Ha! “Planning”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›