this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
68 points (76.6% liked)

World News

39045 readers
2292 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] huginn@feddit.it 22 points 1 year ago

Seems pretty conclusive.

Doesn't mean that Israel should continue the genocide, just that Hamas sucks: which we already knew.

Until this apartheid state is dismantled the violence can't stop: both sides are bound to keep fighting with each other.

[–] thoro@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's definitely suspicious that there are no munitions remnants available for analysis. You would think there would be something. If there is anything, independent investigators need to be given access. Otherwise, the perception of impropriety will color peoples' analyses.

But the idea this has been "concluded" doesn't seem correct either.

As stated in this article, Al Jazeera, Channel 4, and Forensic Architecture reached conclusions that the air explosion shows the rocket was intercepted and destroyed, not misfired, and there is no causal link between the air explosion and ground explosion at the hospital.

The AP analysis argued against this, but did in fact note this was a possibility. I believe the CNN and others use the same arguments and resources as preliminary OSINT analyses.

Now, GeoConfirmed and other OSINT accounts (Oliver Alexander) are backtracking from their early hypotheses and concluding the Al Jazeera claim is in fact the likely scenario, arguing that the intercepted explosion is too far away from the hospital to be connected. They still think a rocket is the "likely" cause, however.

I wonder if we will ever know what happened for sure, but there is definitely more to this story.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

It’s definitely suspicious that there are no munitions remnants available for analysis.

No munitions. No 500 dead. No destroyed hospital. No bomb crater. But Hamas said it, so it must be right. This whole thing has been an absolute clown show of incompetence from the worlds press.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will this change any Hamas supporter's mind that they are not to be trusted? No, because their minds were made up the moment they started supporting them.

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please don't confuse hamas supporters with supporters of Palestine. Two totally different things.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay so who’s a Hamas supporter? Because I’ve never met anyone so far who supports them, to the point that this sounds like a strawman.

People protesting in Berlin, yelling antisemitic slurs, handing out candy to celebrate the deaths of Israelis. Those Hamas supporters. People like that are few but ubiquitous.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny how anyone who's suspicious of Israel's far-right, militaristic government is a "Hamas supporter".

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Found suspicious by who? Dumbasses on the internet? As long as it's the not the government, I have a right to call out BB's dumbassery that sure didn't help this situation.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's so absurd that it seems plausible to anyone that israel was the perpetrator! Nor that they had bombed hospitals and other buildings full of civilians before, or that they were dropping thousands of bombs a day on a densely populated city and it was entirely foreseeable that some would end up where they were not supposed to.

/s, necessary because of the limited capabilities of the zionists.

That hospital bombing you're referring to wasn't them. And are they the perpetrators of that Hamas attack? Fuck no, the responsibility lies squarely on Hamas' shoulders.

[–] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it is nearly impossible to dismantle a belief system like this. Just like it is with extreme (both left and right) political beliefs.

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Something something… independent UN and ICC verification… for the billionth time.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, the new York times, known for its journalistic integrity, inspiring such onion headlines as

"It Is Journalism’s Sacred Duty To Endanger The Lives Of As Many Trans People As Possible"

https://www.theonion.com/it-is-journalism-s-sacred-duty-to-endanger-the-lives-of-1850126997

Also well known for being on the right side of history/s https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/iraq-war-media-fail-matt-taibbi-812230/amp/