this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
104 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The occasion is the latest convening of the Human Rights Committee on the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). A U.S. delegation will face independent United Nations experts on the Committee, tasked with assessing compliance with the ICCPR, who will once again question U.S. treaty violations at Guantánamo Bay. The U.S. presentation provides an opportunity for President Biden to take a significant step forward and recognize the application of international law to the medical needs of an aging detainee population that is fast deteriorating from the effects of torture and harsh conditions.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And an attorney who argued in favor of torture at Gitmo is polling second behind trump.

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wasn't DeSantis involved in torture at Gitmo as a lawyer?

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, bro.

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DeSantis was as I recall a US DOJ lawyer who was part of overseeing the "legality" of the torture of people at Gitmo.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. JAG at the time I thought, but he was the one arguing water boarding isn't torture.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remember how everybody freaked out when Obama wanted to shut this abomination down?

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obama had to constantly walk on glass. Every decision, including the color of his suit, was scrutinized.

We are seeing the non-racist version play out with Biden as the GOP tried to work in a impeachment over... Fucking nothing?

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Not nothing it's over a vague allusion in an email which I think we can all agree is an absolute smoking gun. After all it says "the big guy" which HAS to be POTUS Biden and couldn't be any of the list of other guys Hunter was doing business with because as we all know no one has ever used "the big guy" to refer to anyone else /s

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why wouldn't they? Are you going to let our rogue's gallery of terrorists with an African Muslim whose wife is secretly a man and who wears brown suits while ripping our country apart because he wouldn't say racist things about people who were being beaten and murdered due to systemic racism? What are you, crazy??????

But Biden can't due it either because communism or something. Oh yeah! And he's old. You can't trust old people. You should call the cops on your grandparents because they're old.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regardless of your opinion on the subject, it's important to note that the US does not recognize international law and is a geopolitical superpower that cannot have international law forced upon them. This in essence makes this entire thing a geopolitical version of "Who's line is it anyway?", where the results don't matter.

As an American, this is so painful.

It's bad enough we say fuck you to the metric system and a bunch of other international norms.

[–] GracchiBros@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Not sure if it's really a test when the results don't matter. The US will keep on ignoring basic human rights, another report condemning the US will come out, no one in any positions of power will do anything meaningful, and nothing will ever change.