this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
499 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago

3rd party ads lead to the roulette wheel of malware injection. M$ can't even keep the malware links off of their garbage MSN homepage on Edge. This would be an extremely dumb move, and they will do it anyway because it trades off security for money.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 88 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

To the surprise of absolutely nobody. There's no way it was going to be free and have no ads.

Edit: By the way, I don't see many people talking about it but DALL-E 3 was stealthily launched in the new Bing chat update and it's incredibly impressive. By far the best image generation AI in the market right now, and it probably won't be free for long.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think that the next step is product placement?

"Draw a rabbit wearing a top hat."

Produces picture of rabbit, wearing a top hat, sipping a coke.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be hilariously evil, but I doubt they'd go that far. They'll likely just put an ad in-between every prompt if they decide to go full greed.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

Why not both? Why would their greed have a limit like that?

I could see this being a very interesting watermark - the free demo is sponsored by Coke, and all images will prominently feature the product. Upgrade to a paid/business/Enterprise account to get images without the product.

Given how many God-awful advertising patents have already been filed, I really can't see anyone turning down this opportunity. The only reason against it would be a technological limitation- making sure the product isn't featured alongside negative/toxic content. For instance, Hitler yelling at a bunch of homeless orphans (while holding a Coke)

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It won't be free for long. MS already announced that it will be moving to a paid service shortly.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wonder if they'll use the Hulu model of "pay us money and still see ads"...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jay9@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Geez, ads baked into an OS. What a time to be alive.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The ads have been baked in for a while. Every time I turn on my PC, the first thing I see is it trying to get me to buy Game Pass, and when Starfield came out, it was putting pictures from the game on that startup screen. Even after I tried to turn that off, it still showed them.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah windows has been an ad delivery platform since windows 11 came out. It’s why it was a “free” upgrade for so many people

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you mean to say Windows 10?

Ads have been served in Home edition since 10 was dropped with 1507. And they strip group policy from it to make it harder to change that. Windows Vista to Windows 8.1 were offered free upgrades to Windows 10, based on the version those keys belonged to.

I'm right now testing Windows 11 deployment for work and I hate it. I'll move to Linux before I move to Windows 11 on my personal devices.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, whenever the specific changes were put in place as you outlined. I don’t use windows enough to know the history, but I appreciate the clarification

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 18 points 1 year ago

Right? You bought the OS but you still get ads. Even worse, it sends your data to MS servers

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now is a great time to give Linux a shot. I recommend Pop! OS.

[–] mofongo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Does pop os also have a copilot?

[–] Massada42@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. However, it also lacks ads.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Double bonus!

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really, really don't need an AI assistant for regular computer usage. It's a solution in search of a problem.

There are genuinely good reasons to use GitHub Copilot if you're a developer, but otherwise, I think they're way more trouble than they're worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No Linux distro has, as M$ hasn't made their AIs open source. But there are people working on open source alternatives.

[–] mofongo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok that sounds awesome do you know any open source copilot projects by chance?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mofongo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thx for the suggestions! I’ll check them out

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Theres paid ai .. like this

https://github.com/KillianLucas/open-interpreter

Give commands to chatgpt in the the terminal. Then it executes it. It can generate files, etc as well. Using python iirc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FrancisFeliz@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago
[–] michael@leuker.me 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sigh, one more thing for the list ...

"Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"

"Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written on the sky. Oh, and in our operating systems. But not in dreams. No siree!"

[–] buycurious@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft: the beatings will continue until morale improves

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Microsoft: We now inject the malware attack vector directly into your OS because it makes us slightly more money.

[–] itsraining@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Like it wouldn't.

Please, it's 2023. Corporarions have totally embraced the "you are the product" model. They offer you a service on their infrastructure ("the cloud") on their terms, which they can modify and terminate on will. Then they make money by selling your data, showing you ads and using your data to personalize those ads so that you are more likely to click on them.

Shame or ethics? Please, it's money that makes the world go round. Ads in every app! Ads on the web! Ads in every corner of the city! Ads on public transport! More ads! Even more ads! No square centimeter of physical and virtual space left unused!

It's really pathetic.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Microsoft will keep doing this shit until their monopoly is broken.

I don't know why people are continuously surprised at MS doing scummy things when they pretty much control the market, have little to no competition, and regulators have proven they don't care.

[–] macallik@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Come on over to Linux yall, the ~~water's~~ open-source vibes are fine

[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Truly amazing. Usually you roll out these features, get the userbase involved and intrigued at these new features, get used to them and THEN try and monetize it to capitalize on the sunk cost feeling

[–] Fish@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was finally able to get rid of the ads in Windows. I'm sure that it doesn't block everything, but editing the 'hosts' file helps. At least I don't see any ads in Windows anymore. Here is an simple tutorial that I found on how to do so:

youtu.be/IJr2DcffquI

[–] clanginator@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I removed copilot the instant I saw it. I don't need any more Microsoft online shit built into my OS, thanks. (I also use Arch, but Windows kernel anti-cheat)

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's the knife they slip in with a new "free" feature in Windows...

At least with co-pilot for O365, they are charging (a lot of) money for the feature, presumably without ads.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure it'll still spy though.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep telling myself im going to give linux a try at some point, and I should probably get familiar with it as soon as possible

Your instinct is right, because it does take a little bit of time to be familiar enough that it's automatic, but it doesn't need to be a big daunting thing - I first dabbled with Linux running in a virtual box. Then I dual booted for a while. Now I'm running just Linux. Dipping your toe in the water is good

[–] retfma@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

acts surprised

[–] nostradiel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Ok, I won't update anymore my Windows..

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I had a brief look at enabling this but I didn't see the point. Copilot in the office suite or outlook makes sense though.

load more comments
view more: next ›