this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1400 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8565 readers
2504 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That was the dumbest thing I have read today…

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fries are what the British would call 'chips' and the British are objectively wrong on this one specific thing

[–] HexagonSun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

I’ll bite.

It might have been different a few decades ago, but in the UK these days fries are still fries. Nobody would ever ask for a Big Mac and chips. Chips are specifically much fatter ‘chipped’ potatoes. And potato chips are crisps.

So if we’re talking objectively… Fries are just the same US and UK. But US potato chips aren’t actually ‘chipped’, they’re very thinly sliced. And ‘crisps’ are indeed very crisp.

So I’d actually say the UK descriptions are more objectively correct.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 158 points 1 week ago (14 children)

How to order a hamburger that's mostly spit

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 133 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unrealistic. This is way too coherent. Needs more word salad.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 30 points 1 week ago

Also he should start crying at one point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they're sending their cashiers to Wendy's...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago (8 children)

He is a racist and a bigot

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Jordan Peterson is a charlatan

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gjoel@programming.dev 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don't think the vodka applies, that's more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.

[–] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It's so sublime. sob

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gets plain fries, but gets charged for vodka. Cashier points to vodka line on the bill and says "potatoes", then points to fries and says "potatoes".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

False inductive reasoning combined with butwhataboutism and sealinoning. All designed to exhaust the opponent and muddy the argument. Conservatives love this form of argument.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sealioning (source) + whataboutism. A very cheap method of trolling and exhausting the opponent of the argument which relies on the victim being unaware of sealioning and they're being sealioned. It's frustrating seeing JP fans think this is proof he's a genius. it's like Ben Shapiro, another rightwing "influencer" who constantly speaks fast and gish gallops on purpose and his fans think he's a genius for that too

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 41 points 1 week ago

It depends on what the definition of 'is' is.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

"Colloquialism, motherfucker! Do you speak it‽"

Edit: corrected autocorrect incorrection

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dragging your opponent into the weeds does not a good argument make

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Currently watching a Peterson debate... This is just too perfect.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

After not receiving the fried Jordan cries in his car.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My dog is an intellectual powerhouse compared to Jordan Peterson fans.

Lol. I just Googled him and his YouTube channel description reads...

"Join intellectual phenomenon Dr. Jordan B. Peterson for enlightening discourse"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Watching him debate those atheists was painful. His debating technique is beyond stupid.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago
  1. Make a statement that is at best wildly controversial and at worst blatantly untrue
  2. Redefine the words in that statement to make it vacuously true and completely uninteresting
  3. When challenged, say that you don't care about common parlance
  4. Everyone loses, because this debate is now pointless and annoying
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reading this increased my blood pressure.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See? That means he won the argument. Checkmate, atheists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stupid People glom onto him like he's a genius. I guess he kinda is a genius compared to the average Trump voter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My father tried to tell me what a "genius" he is. I told my father point blank, Jordan Peterson is only a genius to morons. He even gave me one of Peterson's self help books, I immediately tossed it in the trash. Though, in retrospect, I probably should have tried to return it to Amazon and used the money to buy something more worthy of reading, like Chick Tracts. 😂 At least they're entertaining.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a great impression of him talking about Burger King that I have to share. He's doing this same kind of stupidity in this video. https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, I haven't heard much about JP in a while,and now I've heard a podcast and this. Is it just coincidence or is there a reason we're talking about him again? The podcast mentioned he'd gone on some show debating Christianity with 20 atheists. It went as you might imagine, where jp argued that atheists were Christian because they didn't understand the thing they say they don't believe in. Idk. Anyway -- any other reason I'm hearing about him again?

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's mostly just that. The whole thing was a mess. The atheists were told they would be debating a Christian and prepared as such, but he won't define himself as a Christian. So much time is wasted dancing around that. They had to change the title from Christian debates to Jordan Peterson debates. On top of that he will barely engage properly, saying things like he won't entertain a hypothetical because he wouldn't allow himself to get in that situation in the first place. Just generally not acting in good faith.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›