this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
359 points (97.4% liked)

politics

24609 readers
3290 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

You know, mistakes are personal, but misery is shared by all, right.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 35 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

This is the kind of scenario I see in my head when one of these asshats say they wanted to "shake things up in Washington". 🙄

It's hard to build a system, even if it's not working 100% perfectly (and no human institution is ever likely to do so). Very hard. It's quite simple to break shit. Any toddler can kick over a sand castle.

But hey, at least we did something about the "status quo", because having a status quo is automatically a bad thing according to a whole lot of fools and dumbasses.

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This but on the third panel they blame Biden and the democrats.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

100% that last panel. Also, to really complete the DARVO effect, it could use a few third parties popping up to represent the Elevated Centrists, the "independents", the "liberal media", and a certain kind of "leftist" that like to blame the Democrats for not stopping the Republicans doing all the awful shit they get up to...

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

So, a couple of things... Yes, their fault for being Trump supporters...

But also... She's 45, she came here when she was 10. She's had THIRTY-FIVE YEARS to become a US Citizen.

It does take an insane amount of time to work through the citizenship process, but it doesn't take 35 damn years. Especially not after marrying a US citizen.

Source: Friend of mine did it based on refugee status from Lebanon. My daughter-in-law did it on a student basis from Burma after marrying our son.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You could easily argue she was deported for trying to take the legal route. They grabbed her from her green card hearing

Realistically I’m sure it’s just laziness. ICE has quotas to meet and they realize they can’t meet them while performing due diligence. So, instead of finding and convicting criminals, set ambushes at immigration courts and places of work. It shows both the stupidity of quotas and the reality of creating “criminals” where none existed before

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

True, but it's a green card hearing that should have been done 29 or 30 years ago when she was 15 or 16 and trying to get her first job. :)

She's been here since the George H.W. Bush administration... plenty of time to have worked things out.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

you think becoming naturalized is going to stop them from deporting people?

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

naturalized are next "on the list" after they finish dealing with birthright citizens.

My parents moved to the US from Canada back in '98, became US citizens, and I've been hounding them almost daily at this point to come back home to Canada. At this point I don't care if I go into massive debt providing for them or if I have to get a second job just to be able to afford a place to rent with more than 2 bed rooms.

I'm just so terrified every day that ICE is going to detain one of them or both. I just can't get through to them that they need to leave the US and come back to Canada right now.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh no, they'll still revoke legitimate citizenship, but she made it way too easy by, you know, not earning citizenship in the first place.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I don't quite understand why we have a system where someone that comes here at 10 later has to take extra steps to become a citizen, honestly.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, if they come here at 10 and aren't a citizen and don't do the work to become a citizen, then they still aren't a citizen.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I agree that's a fair point. I just wonder why it's even necessary to go through any extra hoops if you come here as a minor.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the only guarantee is being born on US soil, there's nothing in place for minor children who are already citizens of a different country.

I could imagine automatic citizenship like that would cause more problems. Other countries would be like "Hey, we didn't authorize that!"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the only guarantee is being born on US soil

Well...for now, anyway. 🤮

I guess I don't know what the process is and how long the ordeal is, but it just seems weird that on top of all the other things one gets to do when thrown into adulthood is that they'd have some arduous process to go through.

I could imagine automatic citizenship like that would cause more problems. Other countries would be like “Hey, we didn’t authorize that!”

Fair. There is the problem of having to revoke it for countries that don't permit dual citizenship, I guess. Maybe if the U.S. at least had a short form they sent out to minors just before they turn 18 and had a simple and quick thing they'd do to file for it. Something that should not take more than a month to get finalized. So maybe not entirely automatic, but very simple and straightforward and quick.

That being said, we have the system we have and this woman should obviously have adhered to the one we have...and also her husband should not be voting for the likes of Taco and she should not be "supporting" Taco, either.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

That was the thing my daughter in law ran into... Myanmar doesn't allow dual citizenship, so she had to give up her own citizenship to become a US citizen.

In the end, it's safer for her now because she can visit her family and doesn't have to worry about being immediately blocked re-entering the US.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The levels of dumb and laziness on her part say she got what she deserved. She could have earned citizenship and she could have become politically informed.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 30 points 16 hours ago

Trump voter: I only wanted to hurt other people!

Reality:

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 51 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Pro tip: yes, you did vote for this, moron!

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago

They literally wrote a playbook that included all the evil shit they were going to do.

[–] enthusiasm_headquarters@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck all these people straight to hell. I'm for either stripping Trump states of statehood, turning them into commonwealths where they can pay for their own social security and medical coverage (because right now, the vast majority of them don't), or going back to 1870 and sending in the Union cavalry to fucking keep them the fuck out of politics, allowing black people and immigrants to vote, etc. What horrible people. Fuck you and your grandmother too.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

The sad thing is that these people are using our money and having Taco sending that money directed against blue areas. Once ICE gets all their funding, it's about to get a whole lot worse.

Taco seems to be tearing this country apart. Gee, I wonder what two countries might benefit the very most from that?

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 108 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

The fuck did any of them think this meant?

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 30 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

That lady is a sleep paralysis demon.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wonder if the sign-holder voted for deporting brown people, but is possibly making use of Medicaid/Medicare?

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 26 points 19 hours ago

She's in a wheelchair but not a really nice wheel chair. I'd say the odds are pretty fucking good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I'll bet 1 internet point that they never vote anyone but republican for the rest of their lives even after this. The ones who don't get deported of course.

[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 145 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

What's interesting about this case is that she's an illegal who was deported years ago but snuck back in anyway. Did she forget about her illegal status? Or did she think she would be spared by supporting Trump?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 124 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The cynical answer is she thought the would be spared because she's white.

The straight answer is that Trump told people the country was being overrun by criminals and gang members whom he would deport. People who bought that story thought those who didn't fit that description would be safe.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 25 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

Well, the thing about being a criminal is that it means you’ve been convicted of a crime.

Trump is a criminal. But he was born in the US to US citizens.

The goal is to make all sorts of things crimes such that it’s almost impossible to function in the US as a foreigner without committing a crime. At that point, the government can choose the people to deport at their whim.

Since birthright citizenship is being struck down, and this government interprets the constitution as only applicable to citizens, expect Trump to attempt again to pass legislation for more types of citizenship nullification.

One tricky bit is, if you’re declared legally dead, you immediately become an illegal resident if you’re still alive. And DOGE has already declared a number of people dead by misinterpreting a few databases.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 78 points 23 hours ago

"I thought this would happen to OTHER people and I was all for fucking up other people's lives! Not MINE!"

[–] Nusm@piefed.zip 69 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I hate this graphic. Read top to bottom, "have the day you Voted for" which is obviously incorrect as you would only capitalize the first word of the statement, so it's bottom to top/left to right, thus "Voted for day you have the" which is also clearly not correct. Even if you ignore the capitalization error, the statement is just shit. I get what it's trying to convey, but it sucks ass at doing so. It's a roundabout way of saying "you reap what you sow" but the creator got all "Live, Laugh, Love" (or I guess "live, laugh, Love") about it and thought they were creative and smart.

I bitched about this like 6 months ago the last time I saw it, and I'll bitch every time I see it. It's awful on all levels. Mirror the rainbow, flip the text so it reads left to right + top to bottom, and they really need a sharper phrase in general.

[–] Nusm@piefed.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Dude, it’s just a graphic I got from somewhere else, and I throw it on posts where it seems to apply.

I get what bothers you, but I think you’re caring wayyyy too much about a little comment graphic to type all that out! I’ve posted it a bunch of times, and everyone seems to understand the meaning just fine in spite of the odd capitalization.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what you get if you are too lazy to create a simple graphic like this yourself and instead use an LLM for it.

[–] Nusm@piefed.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Actually, I didn’t create it or use AI, I just stole it off someone else’s post.

I’ve been using it for weeks, and everyone else seems to understand the meaning just fine. I know upvotes don’t mean anything, but whenever I post it, it gets more upvotes than any of my typed comments.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, if it wasn't you, somebody was too lazy to DIY it and created it via AI.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

"He isn't hurting the 'right people‽‽‽'"

-Fucking idiots that I told not to vote for him, but now their family members are disappearing.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 49 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They keep saying "criminals," even in this story. Some of them are US citizens, one of them was 4. I'm pretty sure a 4 year old isn't a criminal. Also, with no due process, we don't know shit if they're criminals or not. This is a money grabbing grift that is disappearing people, probably to death.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I’d go even farther. Since there’s been precious little due process, essentially none are criminal. Essentially none of those deported have been convicted of any crime.

And no, I’m not taking the word of the people who deprived them of that right while hiding their own faces

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Awww sorry did you think Trump just meant blacks, latinos and middle easterners? My heartfelt condolences...🎻

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›