this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
449 points (95.0% liked)

politics

24609 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll just point out the risk of what I'll call "Joe Roganing" here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there's no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he "makes up his mind" and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Good time to make a fourth party.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that why he's suddenly criticizing Trump? He thinks he can split the Democratic vote?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

are they hiring? i have many expensive ideas with zero guarantees of success

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Reading the article to see what ridiculous name he's going to give it.

"The America Party"?

TBH, pretty tame in Musk standards. At least it's pronounceable.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He named it that so their members are called "Americans." He's trying to steal our national identity for his new Nazi party.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The name is to make a grab at the r’s. If it wasn’t, he would have named it the x party.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm surprised he didn't go with a stupid acronym

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (9 children)

The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When people say that they want a third part I doubt they mean it literally, as in they believe there are literally only two parties, but rather I suspect they mean that they want a third party which is large and influencial.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sort of. They usually mean it literally, but it’s rooted in the misunderstanding of the political system that most folks have. And I don’t blame them for this, I just find the grandiosity amusing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (21 children)

I’m not sure if I want this to fail or succeed.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 153 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 84 points 2 days ago (9 children)

We'll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it'll just end up the same as it always has.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we're used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The America Party run by a South African.

Popcorn is not enough for this country.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The entire Democrat demographic hates him for kissing Trumps ass.

The entire Trump demogaphic hates him for going against Trump.

And the Republican demographic have never liked him as far as I'm aware.

So.... who are his voters? Probably just a convenient way to shuffle money around.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

He's completely unable to read the room. Understandable really, he doesn't exist in the same world as the rest of us really.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

This isn’t about money. It’s about Elon Musk‘s ego and will to power.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Honestly, I am tentatively very excited about this. Not because I support that nazi in any way whatsoever. I am excited because he stands to be a significant spoiler for the GOPs elections.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He will pull a Joe Rogan and endorse Trump last minute.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, can "aliens" start political parties in the USA?

Imma start a "British Colony" party over there; anyone want to join me? MAABCA.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

He doesn't have to run himself. He can endorse and fund people to run for him

load more comments (1 replies)

Odd strategy.

Leftists won't buy it, and most liberals aren't going to buy it, and it might divide the right, while team blue is fracturing.

Gonna be a 4 on one, not a 3.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How? I thought a prereq was to do a certain amount of philanthropy or action at the local level first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe that's the only way US will ever get a third party. I'm not an American but I do think american politics system would be significantly stronger even with a minority 3rd party. Can you imagine how powerful US would be with a diverse parlament that has true competition of ideas not just partisan voting? That's true "checks and balances".

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

The problem is the US isn't setup for third parties to really work, all this is going to do is most likely be a spoiler vote from Republicans and give more wins to Democrats. Maybe if they're lucky they'll win a few seats in uncompetitive districts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The American Billionaires Party?

If they manage to steal half the GOPs votes, we have reason to thank him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (7 children)

What kind of shitty click bait is this?

The richest man in the world officially announced on Saturday that he has officially formed a new political party to challenge Republicans and Democrats alike.

He fucking tweeted that it was created, literally nothing official.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›