this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
133 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hilarious to me that the complaint is he worked with Democrats to avoid a shutdown, so naturally they remove him... by working with Democrats...

[–] resin85@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago

Hahaha.... that's a level of irony way beyond the capability of most Republicans to understand.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Prior to McCarthy, no House speaker had ever been ousted through a motion to vacate."

So apparently McCarthy was a trailblazer in being voted out of the job as Speaker.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Prior to McCarthy, the threshold to hold a vote to remove was 1/2 of one party or the other.

McCarthy's concession to become speaker was to reduce that from 1/2 a party to one, single, member.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hang on, that means McCarthy himself can keep voting to remove Gaetz? This could get even more hilarious.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yes, if the rule isn't removed, McCarthy (or anyone, really!) could start this all over again.

[–] Gargleblaster@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Ken Buck, Andy Biggs, Tim Burchett, Eli Crane, Bob Good, Nancy Mace and Matt Rosendale

No Boebert, MTG, and co. other than Gaetz.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Tuesday morning, McCarthy, a Republican from California, asked Congress to vote on a motion to vacate him as House speaker.

One of the concessions involved McCarthy agreeing to allow a single member of the House to file the motion that could remove him at any time if enough votes were cast.

Gaetz previously threatened McCarthy while urging the speaker to take a stronger stance against certain issues, such as in negotiations to prevent a government shutdown and impeaching President Joe Biden.

However, the seven Republicans who joined Gaetz on Tuesday afternoon to remove McCarthy were: Ken Buck, Andy Biggs, Tim Burchett, Eli Crane, Bob Good, Nancy Mace and Matt Rosendale.

Representative Patrick McHenry of North Carolina will be speaker pro temp until a new one is elected.

McCarthy was confident ahead of the vote but said that he refused to work with his Democrat colleagues to save his job.


The original article contains 464 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!