this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
63 points (64.5% liked)

Memes

51307 readers
934 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 1 points 4 hours ago

What about Gaza?

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

With all that is happening in the world, someone decides to spend time to make a meme about NATO being a bad guy?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago

Given that NATO is actively supporting the worst thing going on the world (as usual), yes?

[–] jackeroni@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Well yeah, considering they are the bad guy, NATO is nothing but an organization for the furtherance of US empire led expansionism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Never ask an EU supporter about why their own country doesn't get to decide things for its self

[–] jackeroni@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Ah, Yugoslavia. How dare anyone disturb that genocide.

[–] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Bombs were falling on civilian targets nowhere near Kosovo. Various bridges, schools, hospitals, a chemical plant in Pančevo that almost destroyed the entire city, the Chinese embassy, a bomb fragment fell literally in my family's garden. Hundreds of civilians died, my grandma almost impaled on a table from a bomb shockwave and the glass shattered onto the cradle I was in (I was 1 year old at the time), but luckily my mom placed protection around me just in case. This was on the far north of Serbia.

To be clear, OP is a tankie who shouldn't be given any attention or a platform (I checkes their post history), but the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 was a campaign that caused untold suffering to countless civilians (be it in injuries, deaths, or just going through every day not knowing whether you and your loved ones will be alive tomorrow) that had absolutely nothing to do with Kosovo, something that left scars in society that are still felt. It was not simply "disturbing a genocide". Not to mention that it was an attack launched without the approval of the UN.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Of all the things, you decided to defend that scumbag. He and his cronies were one of the primary agitators that caused the war. Even if he himself didn't order a genocide, he actively militarily supported the Bosnian Serbs that caused one. And say what you want but the bombing did stop the active ethnic cleansing happening in Kosovo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was intense conflict along ethnic lines on both sides. NATO didn't intervene to "stop a genocide," it bombed hundreds of state-owned factories and murdered over 2000 civilians (including 300 Albanians, which NATO claimed to be "protecting"). The real drive was to destroy a nation that dared to be a part of the Non-Aligned Movement, and make them subservient to western interests, opened up for foreign plundering.

The ethnic violence was horrible, but NATO didn't really fix it, it took advantage of it as a reason to get involved and achieve the aims of western powers economically.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why doesn't NATO disturb the current genocide in Gaza?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, who do they think they are? NATO?

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gotta love 2025. Is this an alt-right post or an alt-left post? No one can tell. Horseshoe theory, etc etc.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The right is pro-NATO, as NATO is the main millitant arm propping up western imperialism, and the left is anti-NATO for the same reasons. There's no "alt-left," lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone against NATO is against Western imperialism and would be considered a "leftist" by Western standards (just humane and ethical for the rest of the world). I don't see what can be misunderstood here.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plenty of far-right people would be leftist then. Interesting

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're just saying words now, lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›