this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
84 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62190 readers
445 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] romantired@shibanu.app 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 17 hours ago

We're entering a new era, where streaming services are running out of new subscribers, so the only way to keep the money flowing is by providing truely innovative, high-value experiences that customers actively want to support financially.

I feel like I'm living in bizarro world when the above statement represents a business' last-resort effort for survival instead of it's primary focus.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"the new approach is subscribe to one or two services and pirate the rest"

i'll just pirate everything and subscribe to nothing thnx

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 6 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I pay for YouTube because I hate ads and I use the music service heavily... I also pay (A LOT) for a MotoGP subscription, but that's sports, and unless I'm awake when there's a race being pirate streamed I'd be sol.

For everything else, i sail the salty seas

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

Most of the MotoGP races are posted to Broadcasthenet, just saying.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

I've considered it a few times but they are raising the price so quickly year after year that it will be untenable in a couple of years anyway.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I usually watch YouTube through a laptop that blocks ads.

The YouTube ads are still annoying on my phone, etc., but not nearly as bad as Spotify (unusable).

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

The YouTube ads are still annoying on my phone, etc

Android? If so, install PersonalDNSFilter. Haven't seen a youtube ad in I really have no idea how long.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 5 points 16 hours ago

There are third party options for your phone. Just research it.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

can anyone ELI5 why music streaming never fragmented like TV streaming did?

An album being exclusive to a particular platform seem to be incredible rare. TV platform continuously remove things from the catalog to reduce costs but that does not seem to happen often in music.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

Artists are basically already not getting any serious royalty from streaming. Streaming is essentially free other than operating costs for the companies.

You can also listen to that latest track on the radio for nothing.

To fragment the market you'd have to have something so powerful that people would go to one place over another for lack of having it. The effect is surprisingly weak in the music segment, people just listen to other things.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago

My guess is that with TV/Movies streaming you generally sit down to consume a given piece of content in chunks of minimum 1hr, and people rarely watch an episode of one show back to back with another show. So having that content fragmented between services doesn't provide much friction to normal viewing.

Contrast that with music, where having to switch services to listen to a different album would be extremely disruptive to the way most people listen. The only way that would work is if the separate services were generally clustered by genre, like radio. Having said that, I'm a little surprised that niche music streaming services haven't popped up (like how you have Crunchyroll for anime, for example).

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago

Songs are cheap. Ever heard of buying something for a song?

It's because that recording industry, the RIAA vs. the MPAA, has had a stranglehold on the industry and artists for much longer. They are much better at exploiting artists while paying them next to nothing.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 3 points 22 hours ago

TV streaming STARTED fragmented. Just it was all bundled together in a cable subscription. The (ineffective) moderator in that were the cable companies like Comcast, who were always trying to negotiate the price of a channel down. Suddenly with streaming, you could start your own service and getting dropped by someone like Comcast wasn't the death sentence it used to be. The TV content creators are dealing with the end user for the first time.

The music industry long ago learned they get better sales when all their vynal/cassettes/CDs are available at Kmart/Walmart/Best Buy/etc. The music industry DID fragment a bit with online streaming, but those quickly failed. And the artists soon realized that being cool and exclusive to iTunes lead to less money for them.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not picking a yt link, but just replying to the title: streaming wasn't a mistake. Price creep and content fragmentation (needing a subscription for every studio out there) was the mistake

[–] Bitforce@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah piracy more or less died down when Netflix blew up, made it available and easy to stream things legally and they had tons of content.

Now there are 50 services with its own subscription fee and their own library, and they pulled their content from Netflix so no service have a decent library.

So you either have to hop between subscriptions as you watch series and movies, or you pirate.

I don't pirate music because Spotify is good enough for me, but I guess it's just a matter of time before all the big record labels start their own shit service to stream their music.

Plus, if you don't watch on the right device and browser, you get shit quality.

original hulu was great because i could just catch up on literally all the shows the next day and not have to worry about cable

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What's the point of editing out the natural pauses between sentences? I had to stop watching because this dude was inconsistent about it and it was too jarring.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Viewers have literally zero attention span, so if the talking isn't super high speed back to back without even a single second to pause for breath, people click off or scroll past.

Same with subtitles that flash up rapidly, a single word at at time.

That's the sorry state of affairs we are now living with.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It sounded like he was being sloppy about stitching together the audio from multiple takes, rather than a distinct decision.

But yeah, I can't stand that condensed run-on-sentence editing style that so many youtubers have adopted. It has an uncanny valley quality to it that's off-putting.

The Brothers Green were doing that shit 15 years ago.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah I don’t know when that started, but it’s absolutely annoying as fuck.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a fatal accident and it really cut into my finances ...

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only fatal? Jog it off, you'll be fine!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

right? if that's all it takes to stop you paying for 20 streaming services in perpetuity are you even trying?

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Clearly you aren't a real fan...