this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
51 points (93.2% liked)

Harry Potter

600 readers
59 users here now

Community dedicated to the world of Harry Potter.

Mostly focused on books and fan creations, movie content is accepted but should not overwhelm the community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"I don't like her, but not enough to say no to money"

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

"I don't like her, but I do like her money"

In his defense, everyone's gotta eat and everyone has their price.

He probably needs the work/attention.

We're boycotting JK by not buying things she is involved in. He would have to give up his livelihood to boycott her. That's a much bigger ask imo.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For the actors in productions made before her views were widely known, they have that excuse. They can come forward and say "I disagree and disavow" because they didn't know beforehand.

For somebody signing on now, that excuse doesn't work. So it's either greed, or ignorance. Her views are absolutely no secret, and she's apparently "very involved" with the hiring process of the creative team.

When asked if he fears the debate over Rowling may overshadow the series, Frost said, “I don’t know,” adding: “But maybe it shouldn’t blow over? We shouldn’t just hope it will go away, because it makes it easier. Maybe we should educate ourselves.”

So it's not ignorance. It's naked greed and avarice. The contradiction of what Frost is saying in the quote above, and his decision to engage with her writings and deepen her pockets, renders his words meaningless handwringing.

How can a reasonable adult say something so at odds with his own actions? Very, very disappointed in Frost, a man who has performed roles that portray relatable, kind, humble, and emotional people (for all of the comedy in them too!). I guess that's more of a credit to the roles and writers, than the man who acted, which probably shouldn't be a surprise to me but still is, just due to the association. Shame.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For somebody signing on now, that excuse doesn’t work. So it’s either greed, or ignorance.

Or enthusiastic agreement.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why would someone who enthusiastically agrees say something like that? Being anti-trans isn't exactly a fringe opinion at this point.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You're right. I neglected to include that, I apologise -- and I hope that is not the case for anybody who has signed on to this production.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

But don't jump ship until they start shooting. Make them waste as much money as possible before leaving them in the lurch.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

You're working to further enrich her, nick.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

cowards, stand up for your trans friends

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you really think they have any trans friends?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

not that they know of

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You know, the best way to get rid of trolls is to ignore them. Unfortunately, that's the opposite of what the media wants. Trolls raise engagement.