this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
954 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

24165 readers
2210 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 1 points 45 minutes ago

Cute silly furry

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

And it will always end with a more modern and streamlined infrastructure that they never update again and then two years later there is an article that shows how they all went bankrupt.

[–] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

You fucking Donkey!

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This was my entire 25-year career. No way in hell would I want to watch a show like that.

Although if there were a show based on my career, I'm sure the highest ratings would be the show where my coworker fires a 125 mph knuckle ball a foot above a 10-year-old kid's head. It was the only time in my career when I had to physically intervene to prevent a fistfight between my boss and the client.

[–] doctorschlotkin@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Please elaborate on this knuckle ball story. I am confusion.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

We got hired by a company that was developing a remote-controlled baseball launching machine. The machine itself was just the standard two spinning wheels (although the max rotational speed of 125 mph was a lot for this sort of thing), but it could also pivot 360 degrees and also angle itself between straight up and 45 degrees down towards the ground, so it was capable of simulating any hit ball in baseball. The idea was that you would put this machine at home plate and then the coach could walk out among the players and use the remote (which was a Windows Mobile PDA) to generate any kind of hit, like a grounder to short or a pop fly to right field etc. Because the wheels could be independently controlled, you could put any kind of spin you wanted on a ball by having one wheel spinning faster than the other.

Really a cool device and a cool project, but my coworker who got the gig was a remarkably terrible programmer who spent more than a year fucking things up in various ways. At one point, for example, he spent three months trying to develop a Physics engine to control where the ball went, despite the fact that a) he knew nothing about Physics, and b) the Physics of a spinning baseball is actually incredibly complicated and well beyond the processing power of a PDA circa 2005. Not to mention that the balls used varied tremendously in how old and scuffed up they were, which would have defeated any attempt to calculate where they were going with any kind of real precision.

Despite being well over budget and past the original schedule, he had things sort of working (sometimes) and the client asked him to produce a variant of the software that would let the machine be used by Little League coaches. My coworker in addition to writing the version to scale back the speeds appropriately, also decided to completely change the API that was used to communicate with the machine. Previously, the speeds had been specified by short integer values between 0 and 32768, but he decided it would be better to use floating-point values between 0 and 1. All well and good, except his way of dealing with the huge amount of compiler errors this generated was to cast all the hard-coded short int values as floats and clamp the result between 0.0 and 1.0.

As bad as this was, he also decided to test this version - for the first time - on a field with actual Little Leaguers (in his defense - but only slightly - we rarely had access to the actual machine itself, so proper testing was always difficult). The coach sent the command for a slow grounder to the shortstop. This should have produced a horizontal ball with about a 30 mph speed on the bottom wheel and 35 mph on the top wheel to give it some topspin. Instead, his hard-code int values were about 10000 and 12000, which got cast and clamped to 1.0 by the API call - in other words, maximum speed (125 mph) on both wheels. This ejected a ball with no spin going 125 mph, the most deadly knuckleball in human history (human pitchers throw knucklers at maybe 50 mph and they're nearly impossible to hit or even catch). At least he had the angle and azimuth "right" so this was fired straight at the shortstop! Had it hit him, the kid for sure would have badly concussed and very possibly killed, but fortunately it sailed just over his head.

[–] stratoscaster@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Wow thank you for sharing. Very interesting story.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The fuck??? That's a horrible co-worker…

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And this wasn't even his biggest disaster as long as you don't count the potential for death. The baseball-throwing gig was just him and his manager; for his next project he led a team of five developers that turned three months into three years and never produced working software. The only revenue it ever produced was an initial $50K from the client that was later refunded to preempt a lawsuit. For the project he chose Ruby-on-Rails despite the fact that neither he nor anybody else on the team - nor anybody else in the entire state for that matter - had any experience with RoR. I have to give him credit, though: he was a true Renaissance Man in the sense that he could fuck up a project in any language or platform.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

Now, I don't have to be embarrased at the hobby project forks I make. Thanks!

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 21 points 9 hours ago

These images are RAW! YOU, DONKEY! Here, take your blob, and gtfo. GO! OUT!!!!!

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 9 hours ago

I would watch the absolute fuck out of this to the point that my family would be so fucking sick of it.

[–] vrkr@programming.dev 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Still have a copy of Ubu 8.04 on CD somewhere. Not sure if it still works though.

Good times.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 20 points 16 hours ago

I would watch this.

[–] dumbass@quokk.au 35 points 18 hours ago

It surprises me that there aren't more shows like that, just some random dude bursting through your job calling you all twats and pointing out where you failed, then helping you fix it.

I want carwash nightmares or retail nightmares shows.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, but consider that the abbreviations alone would make the show unwatchable. "Hold on, babe, what's a SaaS?"

[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Could use subtitle style helpful info like in Alone

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 15 hours ago

Shit as a Service

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 38 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

“And the big surprise, is that the fucking image uploads are being stored in fucking RAW!”

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that probably a feature, which would then also be advertised to the end user? Maybe for photo-artists and such

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

lol yes, however I'm purely combining

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsBRTEm6HlI

with RAW being an image format. of course it would make sense on a paid image storage service. I'm sorry you felt the whoosh

[–] philthi@lemmy.world 144 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I would watch this. Especially if it was an angry Brit, rather than a dramatic American. And even more if it didn't keep replaying the same 5 minutes of telly before and after each and break. And even more if it didn't have an ad break every 10 minutes that lasted 5 minutes.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

right? I don't watch TV because of all this crap. I don't understand how some people have the patience, honestly.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frog in pot is my guess. I haven't watched ad supported television for like 20 years now and it is so jarring when I'm in someone's house and an ad comes on.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Same with YouTube, honestly.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah give me Ublock or give me death.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This gave me major Dragon Ball Z vibes. Find out on next weeks episode of Dragon Ball Z

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

I once watched bake off on ITV and I swear it was 10 minutes of ads to 3 minutes of show, 50min episode took like 2.5 hrs to watch, it was nuts.

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Can we get Ludic to do this? Not a Brit, but he does have a way with words.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't deploy this for my fucking dog, roll it back now!

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 36 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Just talked to a woman from a company in the same holding as mine. They still run their computers on windows xp. They're in health care and deal with sensitive, confidential patient data.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The criticality of any given service is inversely proportional to how recently released was the technology that it runs on.

This, if you see some ancient machine sitting there humming, don't even make eye contact with that mf, don't even think about it. In fact, try to minimize your time in the same room so when it eventually goes tits up, you don't get blamed.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This week I heard from a network group lead of a university hospital, that they have a similar issue. Some medical devices that come with control computers can't be upgraded, because they were only certified for medical use with the specific software they came with.

They just isolate those devices as much as possible on the network, not much else to do, when there is no official support and recertification for upgrading. And of course nobody wants to spend half a million on a new imaging device when the old one is still fine except for the OS of the control computer.

Sounds like a shitty place to be, I pity those guys.

That said, if you were talking about normal client computers then it's inexcusable.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

Yes, normal client computers. Just for simple document work. Inexcusable indeed

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Quarterly profits above all else bby

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's because every version of Windows since XP has been kind of dogshit

[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 10 points 18 hours ago

It's only been 10 years since XP stopped getting security updates, they'll be fine.

[–] cfi@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

If this is the US, I believe that is a HIPPA violation

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Senior developer: "not my coin miner!! ... i mean, how'd that get there?"

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You joke, but I've actually been responsible for a coder getting shown the door for running a coin miner on his work laptop.

In his defense, cyber security at that company was crap for a long time. After a ransomware outbreak, they started paying attention and brought some folks like myself in to start digging out. This guy missed the easy out of, "hey that's not mine!" The logs we had were spotty enough that we would have just nuked the laptop and moved on. But no, he had to fight us and insist that he should be allowed to run a coin miner on his work laptop. Management was not amused.

[–] lemsip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Am I just stupid or does that seem like an extreme reaction?
Apart from the ~0% profitability these days, what's the issue with running a coin miner?

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Look at this ci deployment! THE TESTS ARE TURNED OFF. YOU'RE RAWDOGGING PRODUCTION.

Oh my days. Your AWS isn't destroying old deployments, no wonder you're indebt, you have seven times more compute than NASA FOR FUCKS SAKE.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago

Oh I have literally thought of this too. Maybe a bit more like Cops or if The Office was a real paper company office... but at a software company. So many fires to put out, so many blockers, so much drama between design / pm / dev / qa / execs, etc. Launch date blockers. Post-release hotfix nightmares. It could work

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Accurate thumbnail

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I've got a lot of unassigned schadenfreude I could put to this.