this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28351 readers
456 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/5400348

Two days ago, I deployed the official wiki for lemmy.dbzer0.com. It's using django-wiki as a software, which other than being markdown-based and therefore helping lemmings easily migrate documentation over, provides python hooks for doing some really cool stuff.

For example my current version is tied to my lemmy instance. This means that while everyone can read the wiki, only registered users of my instance can edit articles. This helps prevents the usual problem of open wikis, which is drive-by spam articles, and ensures that only people with interest in the wiki can use it.

I plan to extend this integration in the future. I am thinking things like minimum account age to edit all or some pages, profile pages which enable even tighter integrations, being able to specify "trusted instances" which would allow edits from their users as well, and so on.

But that's not all, the same approach I used, can also be used to integrate with any fediverse software, like mastodon. This means each instance could theoretically have its own wiki to extend the information adjacent to it.

I'll soon (I hope) will provide an ansible playbook that anyone can use to deploy it which will also provide my custom code to integrate with lemmy.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] folkrav@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Gotta love how /c/ADHD is already on it. Their Wiki will then probably get abandoned for months on end, only to get picked up by the next potential maintainer in a manic "THIS IS NEW AND EXCITING" phase. My people <3

[–] ruud@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Very cool!!

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I wish that I could upvote this more than once. Amazing initiative - I always felt like wiki+lemmy could be a great combo, one for discussion and another for long-term storage of info.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

That's great!

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. Good that we use standard Markdown instead of ''''whatever'''' ''Wikipedia uses''.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, wikipedia was first, and markdown isn't a "standard" :D Just one guy's idea that became popular. But I also prefer the markdown format.

[–] Ferk@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also, I'd argue the wikilinks (internal links) using [[any term here]] from Wikipedia, that optionally allow automatically inferring the link, is much more comfortable (and less error-prone) for the usecase of a wiki system, than the [text required](/link_here_also_required_even_when_redundant) from markdown.

I was hoping they might have added some markdown extension to do something similar, but it seems not.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont see why we cant have both?

[–] Ferk@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Me neither? That's why I was hoping they might have added some markdown extension.

I have done it in the past with mardown-it-wikilinks npm package, for example.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If u know of any clients written in python i can do it. Or i could do it in js but dont hate myself enough to work on 2js programs simultaneously.