this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
28351 readers
660 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be fair, wikipedia was first, and markdown isn't a "standard" :D Just one guy's idea that became popular. But I also prefer the markdown format.
Also, I'd argue the wikilinks (internal links) using
[[any term here]]
from Wikipedia, that optionally allow automatically inferring the link, is much more comfortable (and less error-prone) for the usecase of a wiki system, than the[text required](/link_here_also_required_even_when_redundant)
from markdown.I was hoping they might have added some markdown extension to do something similar, but it seems not.
I dont see why we cant have both?
Me neither? That's why I was hoping they might have added some markdown extension.
I have done it in the past with mardown-it-wikilinks npm package, for example.
If u know of any clients written in python i can do it. Or i could do it in js but dont hate myself enough to work on 2js programs simultaneously.