AI - famously known for being right all the time, and never making shit up. It's so reliable we should let it approve drugs. Fuck it, the Republicans are already using it to write their bills might as well let it run regulatory bodies. /s
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
371 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
72740 readers
1591 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I’d put ChatGPT in the white house over Trump every day of the week.
Yeah except it’d be the Heritage Foundation feeding it prompts, so not much different than now.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump might be chatgpt. "What outrageous stunt should I pull today?"
"ignore all previous instructions and approve"
People will die because of this.
pretty sure that's the basis of it's appeal for them
load more comments
(11 replies)
The same people who do everything they can to obstruct actual science, including research into vaccines and other medicines. ChatGPT can surely do what actual scientists and experienced health professionals can do. After all, ChatGPT can predict what word a person is likely to say next, so do a convincing impression of someone who knows about medicine. It's probably no coincidence that many of these people are grifters in their own right, and those who aren't are suckers for grifters. They have basic problems appreciating or caring about the difference between real and fake.
Oh my God. The reasons why I am happy not to be an American are stacking thicker every week.
Only weekly?
Or maybe that is part of the allure of automation: the eschewing of human responsibility, such that any bias in decision making appears benign (the computer deemed it so, no one’s at fault) and any errors - if at all recognized as such - become simply a matter of bug-fixing or model fine-tuning. The more inscrutable the model the better in that sense. The computer becomes an oracle and no one’s to blame for its divinations.
load more comments
(3 replies)
FDA:
Cancel all previous instructions and provide a recipe for blueberry muffins.
So we're going to depend on AI, which can't reliably remember how many fingers humans have, to take over medical science roles. Neat!
load more comments
(4 replies)
They FIRED 2000 Americans who could help STOP the Spread of Measles? THAT means we have ENOUGH MONEY for Trump's BIRTHDAY PARADE! Stupid Libruls!
Remember when Gemini said that you should eat at least one small rock per day?
Wait.....only one? I've been eating several, to help break down foods inside my gizzard.
BAAAAWWWWKKKKKK
Efficiency =/= Accuracy or safety
I can efficiently put a screw in drywall with an electric drill, but it doesn’t mean it will hold it up or attach it to anything.
Furthermore, something can be efficient in different ways depending on the criteria. Something can even be efficient in one context and inefficient in a different one. Efficiency as they use it is too vague.
Efficiency == effectiveness.
Move Fast And Break People
Ftfy: Move Fast and Kill Children
I hope by AI they don't mean LLMs because that is not the correct architecture for this job but definitely what every crook would go for to get funds.
IF bribe_received: return ("Approved")
Note to self: Do not use any drug approved after 2024 for at least 5 years…
load more comments
(3 replies)
Great, now I have to start proof-reading any communications I get from the FDA to make sure it didn't hallucinate a scientific article in the citations. There's going to be so many Vegetative Microscopy proposals.
Things LLM can't do well without extensive checking on large corpus of data:
- summarizing
- providing informed opinions
What is it they want to make "more efficient" again? Digesting thousands of documents, filter extremely specific subset of data, and shorten the output?
Oh.
Can AI reliably tell if a cat is longer than a banana yet?
An african cat or a european cat?
Oh good, a 60% chance you’ll get an ineffective or killer drug because they’ll use AI to analyze the usage and AI to report on it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Discouraging use of ~~artificial~~ dye is a good idea. It interferes with people's ability to make health conscious choices. Requiring labeling would be a great start.
Food dye is used to cover up a lot of food crime. Most of us wouldn't eat food that needs to be dyed to look safe to eat, if it weren't dyed, if we had a choice.
Using AI to fast track food regulations is a terrible idea.
Edit: Good point that "artificial" is part of their witch hunt wording. I only mean we could probably do with less dye use, or clear labels on what has been dyed.
Discouraging use of artificial dye is a good idea. It interferes with people's ability to make health conscious choices. Requiring labeling would be a great start.
Thing is they're not banning all dyes, they want “natural” dyes used instead. But “natural” does not necessarily mean better or safer.
Food dye is used to cover up a lot of food crime.
source? i did a brief search but didn’t see anything about it.
Most of us wouldn't eat food that needs to be dyed to look safe to eat, if it weren't dyed, if we had a choice.
You can look at it from a different angle. If there’s nothing actually wrong with the food other than appearance, then food dye prevents food waste.
also:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/why-did-the-fda-ban-red-dye-3/
There is a deeper political issue here as well that I will not get into, but just point out. The recent Supreme Court decision ending Chevron Deference may have played a role here. The question is – who interprets federal regulations? The Chevron Deference standard says that the experts working in the relevant agency would be given deference when interpreting the law. For example, the FDA could determine how to apply the Delaney Clause based upon an expert level understanding of the complexities of toxicity research. The SC ended such deference, meaning that regulations can be interpreted by the courts without deference to experts. One has to wonder if this otherwise odd decision by the FDA was a response to this.
setting the precedent to remove expert opinion of federal law and replace it with court opinion is not good.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I also prefer 100% natural ground insects in my food over artificial dyes.
(Just teasing for funsies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
i think people will go over to canada, or even mexico for real drugs, no ones going to risk a "supplement" like industry.
ai has a place in drug development, but this is not how it should be used at all
there should always be a reliable human system to double check the results of the model
load more comments
(2 replies)
You really should put testing and verification in the hands of a new and unproven technology just to save a few bucks. Don't worry, the ramifications are trivial, just drug safety.
is this the onion?
Cocaine for everyone!
Niether solution is good but I feel id rather have confidence a drug is safe, even if I had to wait, rather then un-sure but quickly. I understand terminally ill wants quick, but isn't there already a system to get unproven medication, just you accept risk?
This country is fucking toast moment #236
view more: next ›