this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
64 points (92.1% liked)

memes

15500 readers
4213 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he pulls the lever so the trolley starts to multi-track drift, he can kill all 10 people at once

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus all of the unmentioned people in the trolley since it would also hit both bridges

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Bonus points!

[–] db2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The lever is already pulled, he'd have to push it.

[–] optional@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's a combination of two common 'trolley problem' moral dilemmas.

Do you pull the switch to kill fewer people, even though that would actively involve you in the decision to kill people?

AND

There is a trolley coming - you are with a heavy man on a bridge. Do you push the man off the bridge, knowing his body is substantial enough to gum up the trolley and stop it - to save a greater number of people?

In this scenario, by combining the two, pulling the lever will make the moral dilemma harder - because the fellow on the bridge must decide the life of 1 person vs. the life of 2. On the other hand, refusing to pull the lever will make the decision easier, if still not clear cut - as the fellow on the bridge must decide the life of 1 person vs. the life of 5.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Im not strong enough to push a man heavy enough to "gum up a trolley" any way.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

I've seen a lot of variations of the trolley problem, and this is the first time I've ever heard the "heavy man." It also makes zero sense, because a heavy man would do nothing to a trolley.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

gum up the trolley

heaves

[–] optional@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

maybe i got confused because of the heavy man and bridge being on the two paths... Also, no way that "heavy man" can stop a trolley

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

One of several reasons why the 'heavy man' variant of the dilemma is rarely used in comparison to the switch.

Even if he is Legendarily Dense Man™️?

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

I’m gonna need to ask the people tied to the tracks some questions about themselves…

[–] banana@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The dominant strategy is pulling the lever, because assuming both guys on the bridge don't push, you kill 2 instead of 4, and 2<4. If the guys on the bridge decide to push you kill 1 person in each scenario.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, but wouldn't the person on the left be more likely to push than the one on the right, as they could save more lives by sacrificing one?