this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
89 points (94.1% liked)

Linux

11103 readers
262 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah pretty much.

[–] hera@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if you could run WSL under Wine...

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud -3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why do you need WSL?

MacOS is BSD, so you can do most Linux things with an issue. But some of the BSD tools have different options the the GNU tools.

We moved to Mac years ago and it makes doing almost everything I do a simples

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No. Mac is NOT BSD. Mac took the BSD user space from 20+ years ago. That's all.

I'm not sure why this myth keeps being repeated over and over.

If that's all it takes to "be" BSD, then windows is also BSD since the entire windows network stack was lifted from BSD

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 3 points 2 days ago

it looks like a unix system enough that I can run most of my shell scripts, Windows on the other hand can get in the bin please

[–] lime@feddit.nu 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

because docker. it hard requires a linux kernel and is extremely slow on mac, just like it was on windows until they integrated with wsl.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see, I don't use docker all that much on my works Mac. So haven't noticed the speed.

Also is it the storage share that's slow? As docker desktop is a VM

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

well docker on mac is a fully emulated x86 vm. everything is slow.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looking at the docs, I think the current docker desktop is native arm. QEMU is now deprecated

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

~~It's not that slow. https://www.imore.com/tests-show-apples-m1-emulates-x86-faster-intel-can-run-it-natively~~

Edit: actually I just benchmarked it and containerized x86 Linux runs at like 40% of native speed. So yeah, that's pretty freakin slow.

FWIW arm64 containers ran at nearly native speed, so it's the x86 emulation that seems to be causing the slowdown.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

yeah last i worked with it i was the first person in the company to evaluate the arm macs, and it basically couldn't run our application at all. took a full 40 minutes to spin up, then crashed.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's only if you're running an x86 container right? It should be native with an ARM64 one.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 days ago

yeah. last i had a mac there were no arm containers though.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I looks like it only allows 1 virtual machine at a time so docker-compose wouldn't work

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's very cool! But, my work needs to run proprietary x86 containers not ARM ones. We are sadly being "forced" (they rather still not turn to open source software) to move to Windows. It's a shame.

[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I haven't checked but it should be possible?

macOS has had support for x64 binaries in Linux VMs for a few years now, using their Rosetta 2 translation layer.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I've been using colima for x64 emulation. This blog talks a little bit about it, but basically you start colima in either arm or x64 mode and then can run that type of image - https://blog.barakimam.me/running-vs-code-devcontainers-with-x8664-runtime-on-apple-silicon

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

the performance isn't there yet, unfortunately.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Linux isn't an option?

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 days ago

like a macpak?

[–] CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if this opens up any new opportunities for cool Distrobox usecases.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

You can already sort of hack distrobox-like functionality, but the biggest problem with doing so is that there's no Wayland or X11 server running on macOS, so GUI applications don't work unless you install something like XQuartz, and even then, it's a pretty janky experience.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

So Apple computers actually turn useful?

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope I can run ollama in a container with full power, can't install it natively on my work computer

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 5 points 2 days ago

Still uses VMs, although it's 1 VM per container.