KDE Encourages Windows 10 Users to Switch to Linux : linux

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 36 points 5 days ago (6 children)

On October 14 Microsoft wants to turn [your computer] into junk. It may seem like it continues to work after that date.

I don't begrudge KDE for fishing for converts. It's a perfectly reasonable idea and hey, already more structured marketing than most Linux initiatives ever get around to deploying.

The page does highlight some of the contradictions in the W10 EoL being the great big hope for a major Linux transition for average users. For one thing... yeah, it won't seem like all those computers keep working, they will keep working. Indefinitely. Having to explain to people that their perfectly working computer is actually not working despite all available evidence is a bit of an issue.

The whole page is a who's who of flawed arguments Linux advocates keep impotently making at Windows users. It may be more useful as a guide for the things Linux contributors should be focusing on fixing than as an outreach tool.

Just for a few examples:

For the technically minded, need to connect to your web server to update your blog, or your cloud to upload photos, or even your software repository for development? Just pop open Dolphin, Plasma's file explorer, and use its connectivity tools, that include FTP/SSH clients, cloud integration software, Git/SVN/Mercurial, and more.

Yeah, who the hell is out there SSHing into their web server "to update their blog" but needs to be talked down like a toddler to convince them to try out Linux? This is a mythical beast of an user that does not exist.

You may be wondering if you will still be able to do what you did on Windows.

Linux does take some getting used to after years of using Windows, and you may need different programs to work and play.

Right, that's a big red flag right there for any normie or semi-tech literate professional with a set workflow.

But there are three tricks that will make the transition easier:

Rely on the Free Software community ... And ask a lot of questions! Linux users are a proud bunch and will happily guide you so you quickly become at home.

Nobody wants to ask any questions. Users want to be hand-held by their interface, not a community. Definitely not the Linux community (see the inevitable set of comments soon to materialize below this as an example).

Do not expect the same things you would use in Windows ... but instead look for the programs that will do the same job on Linux.

This is a massive dealbreaker for a whole bunch of people, for understandable reasons.

Keeping all your files and folders will require some planning, but it is not hard. Get yourself an external hard disk you can plug into a USB port and dump all the stuff you want to save on that. You will have no problem reading it from Plasma later on.

This is simultaneoulsy an over and understatement. You can very likely access your old Windows drives from Linux, but it's janky enough that this piece of advice makes sense. Plus you're very likely to squash a bunch of your storage when installing Linux anyway. And when you think about the idea of pulling a couple of terabytes out of your machine just to copy them back over to the exact same drive this seems like a bit more of a hassle than presented.

I haven't thought about this particular issue in a while because I'm set up so it doesn't matter much to me when I install either OS, but... yeah, someone should find a better solution to this.

No forced updates

However, every single tutorial and guide you read will tell you to update all right at the top with the compulsive zeal of a puppy who has just smelled a hidden treat. You may not grow to be as annoyed by this as I am... but if you do, know that I see you.

Again, I am on board with the initiative. I just think there is a bit of denial about both the upcoming demise of Win10 and about how viable this transition process is for the types of users stuck in Win10 at the end of 2025. The entire document is an accidental admission of the gaps that still exist and I would love for it to become a roadmap of things to improve more than a pitch at this void Venn diagram of hypothetical users. If the caveats they list here get fixed it will take remarkably less coaxing to bring users over next time.

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At least it's honest. I really dislike when linux is presented as a drop in replacement for windows where everything will just work how you're used to, because it does require re-learning new software and workflows.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

Agreed. It serves as a bit of a backlog for that reason, and that's a more honest approach than pretending everything is sorted already.

[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, a lot of the things you listed are impossible for KDE to fix. You can't make every single windows program work on Linux, you shouldn't make KDE have exactly the same workflows as Windows, KDE isn't gonna make it easier/better to install Linux on NTFS, and they have no control over tutorials that instruct people to update their software - How could any of these be used as a roadmap?

[+] MudMan@fedia.io -6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Alright, so add that to the top of the pile of issues, then.

The fact that the current development structure producing Linux and its distros/DEs can't solve those issues doesn't justify the issues. End users won't give Linux a pass, they just want this stuff to work.

[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No, you're not understanding what I'm getting at here. Linux is not windows. It cannot and should not aim to recreate it exactly, that's a stupid idea from the get-go and will fail if attempted. Making every windows program work on Linux is also very difficult, but also, that's the Wine team's job, not KDE's - KDE devs don't have the expertise or knowledge to do that work. MacOS isn't bad because it's not identical to Windows, Linux should be judged similarly. It not being identical being seen as an issue is a mode of thinking that cannot lead to success. KDE has to be worth using because it's good in its own right, not because it's Windows without Microsoft.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To quote myself just one post above:

I agree with the idea that selling that everything can be the same on Linux is not a great plan, but Linux advocates often focus on the wrong things to keep and change. They are often very focused on having a similar looking desktop, which nobody cares too much about, and really dismissive about software not having Linux ports, which is a catastrophic issue.

I do see what you see on principle, but I'd argue that the reasons KDE and Linux overall can come up short on "being good in its own right" are significant and often self-inflicted. No user should have to manually add a repository to their software manager, let alone a Windows "exile". Being the only major OS without native or emulated compatibility with major software suites is a dealbreaker for many people and so on.

Whether KDE or Wine or the kernel teams are able to fix the issues remains irrelevant to the end users. I agree they should find their own optimal ways to fix things, I'm saying they haven't found them in many of these areas.

[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I understand what you mean here, but how can KDE realistically make commercial software vendors port their software to Linux? What group or groups could incentivize this, and how can it be done without creating significant user growth first? (it's a chicken and egg problem, so you can't wait until the users are there if they're waiting on software to be available)

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah, it's absolutely a catch-22. That said, most Linux distros come with closed source repos deactivated out of the box. The nicer ones will at least ask you during the install process, but some don't bother. It's less about convincing the devs to port and more about exposing the stuff that already exists.

And Proton shows that a translation layer that works reliably on Linux isn't impossible, it just needs the right amount of focus and investment. I don't know how far the current tools are from that, though. Which is interesting, because I do use Linux on the daily and I haven't even bothered to check in ages, instead moving to Windows for that, which tells you something.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

It is a matter of emphasis I think. Do not imply that they will have to switch.

I think it is important to say that there is software for every use case on Linux. Because, while all know the few cases that are "less" well covered, it is absolutely true these days that, no matter what you want to do, you can do it on Linux. In many cases, the apps you use today are available on Linux too. Emphasize this first for people who are just forming an idea of Linux in their mind and maybe wondering if it could work for them.

After you have done the above, be honest that, not all the same applications are available. It is common that Windows users moving to Linux will have to find alternatives for some of the applications they used on Windows. Do not hide from it. But don't lead with it either.

Finally, it is ok to mention that "in some cases", Windows applications can be used on Linux through emulation. I would give a huge "for example" many Windows games work on Linux SteamOS and Proton. Maybe link to the list. However, how likely this is to work varies from application to application. For most software, it is better to find native alternatives.

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Windows 8 to Windows 10, and Windows 10 to Windows 11 didn't have the exact same workflows either. That's a big part of the reason many people that had compatible hardware didn't upgrade to 11 when given the chance. I think we need to stop trying to cater to expectations of things working exactly the same and instead educate on "things are going to change, but you can be in control of how they change".

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 0 points 4 days ago

Windows 8 to Windows 10 didn't. Which is why Windows 8 was quickly swept under the rug and Windows 9 was named Windows 8.1 to try to make people forget that ever happened.

10 to 11 are reskins of each other as far as the UX is concerned. Behind the scenes there are some hardware and software compatibility quirks, but at the user level it's perhaps the least eventful Windows transition ever.

I know people complain about the enshittification in 11, but a lot of people leave out that many of the controversial features got patched into 10 as well.

I agree with the idea that selling that everything can be the same on Linux is not a great plan, but Linux advocates often focus on the wrong things to keep and change. They are often very focused on having a similar looking desktop, which nobody cares too much about, and really dismissive about software not having Linux ports, which is a catastrophic issue.

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the fact that you have to use different software is the main reason people don't switch.

[–] imecth@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People making an informed choice about linux vs windows are a minority, the majority just don't realize switching is even an option let alone have the technical know-how to go through with it. As long as windows comes pre installed, nothing will touch its hegemony.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

This is a very good point, a lot of self proclaimed hardcore gamers can't even handle building a pc or installing an os, even if it's an easy install like linux.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. I’ve recently switch from Win10 to Gnome 3 briefly (LOL) then to KDE.

Some stronger selling points would be:

The KDE experience is exactly like Windows. Maybe more so.
It works out of the box with my hardware better than Windows did.
It offers more UI customisation, in a pretty straightforward, unintrusive and (mostly) intuitive way.
It’s more consistent and coherent than Windows, especially when it comes to ‘control panel’ stuff.
Way less crapware, such as graphics drivers that come with massively bloated management apps, or a thousand different software updaters running at once.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hah. I don't know if you want to point at the display drivers as an advantage yet. Would be nice, though.

And hey, what's wrong with Gnome? I use Gnome right now. The endless arguments about how Linux is so customizable but whatever customization choice you made is clearly wrong are definitely part of the issue.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Gnome 3

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah.

I mean, still, point stands. But... ah.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I liked MATE when I last used it. I believe that’s based on GNOME 2.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Windows 10 going EoL, Windows 11 having spyware and not supporting legacy BIOS options (so I didn't upgrade sooner) were all three big reasons I am on Linux now on my primary desktop computer.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cool, mr. Unicorn. You are a small minority of a small minority, though. I do have lots of questions about whether you would have upgraded to 11 given the chance, or about when you intend to get a new PC, and whether you'd switch to Win 11 then, or about why you didn't try the workarounds for the compatibility issues, or why you aren't trying the options to extend the support on Windows 10, or whether the spyware thing would have been enough and so whether you'd have switched regardless. Because you sure sound like a guy who would have tried Linux before. "Why I am on Linux on my primary desktop computer" is... very specific wording.

But taking you at your word you're still 2% of 2%. Of 2%, given that you're on Lemmy. Except you seem to be on programming.dev, so... of 2%?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Idk why you're talking like that, I wasn't trying to contradict your point, I was just making conversation and sharing my experience.

But anyways, to answer,

Given the chance to upgrade to 11, I probably would've come close.
I wanted to get a new computer (and have) for years. I'd upgraded everything except the CPU and it was starting to be a problem. Some games are beginning to use the x64 "v3" instructions. Elden Ring ran at 20 fps despite having a 3070 ti.
Around the time I first started to look into work arounds was around the time the recall screenshot stuff started coming out. I didn't want to abandon something working with a workaround just because it's new and shiny. (If I was still using that computer I'd probably try doing the workarounds now. I've already had a BIOS/UEFI issue and I don't wanna upgrade to an OS that technically is only supported on UEFI because of that negative experience.)
Yes, I have tried Linux before. It's just always been on a secondary thing like a laptop. Dual booting is a waste (in my view) so I decided, fuck it, new computer will be Linux only from the start.

If Windows 10 support had been longer, Windows 11 didn't have such a horrible spyware thing (literal screenshots), or my computer was a little newer then I probably wouldn't switch. It was a perfect storm of circumstances, I admit.

Since then the only problems I have run into are very specific ham radio programs that only have Windows support, and even those work on Wine, but it's annoying. I've just been borrowing my wife's laptop. Typically things like firmware flashing programs. CHIRP works perfectly (another program) on all platforms.

Edit: also I had an annoying experience with OneDrive recently. Just a lot of negative things right at the end.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I didn't mean to come across like that, I'm just saying you don't sound like the archetypal Windows user and even if you were you'd be in a tiny minority.

Which, yeah, tracks with what you're saying about both your use case and your profile. You sure don't sound like you're using your PC as the average end user does. The average user has not tried Linux, doesn't have those applications in mind, certainly has no set opinion on dual booting or UEFI. You ARE a bit of a unicorn there. As am I, I suppose, although I'm bouncing back and forth, not maining Linux, and not because I'm particularly dissatisfied with Win 11 specifically.

You are pretty archetypal on the OneDrive thing. Everybody has had an annoying experience with One Drive recently. I don't know that there are any other experiences to be had with OneDrive at all, to be honest.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My experience with OneDrive lol

https://programming.dev/post/17043712

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

True story, OneDrive is the one piece of Microsoft software where I always accept any prompts to give feedback or fill surveys.

My feedback is always the same: "This is the piece of software that has cost me the most money and work hours over the years"

This is an accurate assessment.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, who the hell is out there SSHing into their web server "to update their blog" but needs to be talked down like a toddler to convince them to try out Linux? This is a mythical beast of an user that does not exist.

People that do these sorts of remote work via GUIs exist. But yes, the switch is likely pretty obvious to them. I for one used to do it with Minecraft server stuff, I had FileZilla; Dolphin pretty much replaced that instantly for me. MUCH later, scripts replaced Dolphin.

This is a massive dealbreaker for a whole bunch of people, for understandable reasons.

Is it though? They'd face the same issues switching to MacOS. There's no point in lying that some of their favorite programs may not work. I still miss Paint.net though GIMP has grown on me a lot.

This is simultaneoulsy an over and understatement. You can very likely access your old Windows drives from Linux, but it's janky enough that this piece of advice makes sense.

Nobody is going to leave their old Windows files on their OS drive AND install Linux unless their goal is to dual boot (and that's clearly not who this is for).

The entire file system needs to be replaced in the process of installing Linux, so there's no "somebody should find a better solution to this." The only way to do it would be to relocate and resize partitions as files are copied ... and that's incredibly dangerous. Not to mention attempting to guess what files are important to the Windows user has a high probability to fail.

This advice is good. You should regularly copy stuff you care about to an external hard drive and ideally use a backup program anyways. SSDs don't fail as fast as HDDs did, but it will happen someday (or very well could).

However, every single tutorial and guide you read will tell you to update all right at the top with the compulsive zeal of a puppy who has just smelled a hidden treat.

Yeah, I've never liked this as an argument for Linux. People should update software (at least when there's a security related issue) ... for the exact same reason they should ditch Windows 10. However, as you said "Having to explain to people that their perfectly working computer is actually not working despite all available evidence is a bit of an issue."

Many people prefer to roll the dice with those issues.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -1 points 5 days ago

People that do these sorts of remote work via GUIs exist. But yes, the switch is likely pretty obvious to them. I for one used to do it with Minecraft server stuff, I had FileZilla; Dolphin pretty much replaced that instantly for me. MUCH later, scripts replaced Dolphin.

They exist, but they already know that Linux is an option. It's not a selling point, it's a bit of an echo chamber about how it's possible to do the things you already know every OS can do. If you're messing with those things you've been in a million tutorials with segments on how to do stuff in Win/MacOS/Linux over the years.

Is it though? They'd face the same issues switching to MacOS. There's no point in lying that some of their favorite programs may not work. I still miss Paint.net though GIMP has grown on me a lot.

If GIMP has grown on you a lot you probably should check with a doctor about that. Because ew.

I think it is. The scale to which you'll have to swap software solutions is way larger in Linux, which is why nobody is writing the same advice for Windows or Mac marketing. I'd argue Mac-to-Windows will lose you more options, but either way the expectation is that the software will be there for you or that you'll have a better alternative that is an actual selling point. "Come over and see if you can find a viable alternative to all your work software" is a huge dealbreaker.

Nobody is going to leave their old Windows files on their OS drive AND install Linux unless their goal is to dual boot (and that's clearly not who this is for).

Isn't it, though? I mean, I get why you wouldn't float that option when you're trying to push people to move over entirely, but... that's definitely an option.

The entire file system needs to be replaced in the process of installing Linux, so there's no "somebody should find a better solution to this." The only way to do it would be to relocate and resize partitions as files are copied ... and that's incredibly dangerous. Not to mention attempting to guess what files are important to the Windows user has a high probability to fail.

Well, yeah, but you're describing the problem, not a solution. Let's say that there is no technical solution to preserve a data drive across OSs (there is, but hey). That's an inconvenience, at best, a major problem at worst. In a world where Windows will update you without messing with your partitions and even a clean install will preserve your separate data drives (which Windows has encouraged splitting from the boot drives for a while), this is a reason why you'd be discouraged to take on the more finicky, annoying process of moving everything over to Linux. Especially if you don't know if you're going to like it and may have to move everything back.

People should update software (at least when there's a security related issue) ... for the exact same reason they should ditch Windows 10. However, as you said "Having to explain to people that their perfectly working computer is actually not working despite all available evidence is a bit of an issue."

Yeah, I've always been torn about Windows' approach to updates because of this. I do want automatic updates. I don't want to have to remember to manually check for and fire off updates. Especially when the longer you wait the more of a gamble it becomes that something will have broken after you're done.

This became a meme on Windows because their early implementations of Windows update were insanely blunt and annoying. Nobody wants their computer to reset in the middle of a presentation or a game. I'd say that an automated reminder to update or an update scheduler are not inherently a bad thing, though. For big sysadmins that will only update what's strictly necessary you want the option of manual updates, but for desktop users who typically will want to be on latest for everything? Just letting their computers update overnight or on every reboot isn't the worst idea ever.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It starts off strong: "Upgrade your software, not your computer". This is a great slogan that says exactly the right thing.

That said, I do not think the message should start off with such heavy fear-mongering. "Your computer is toast" is too much. A lot of people are going to immediately discount everything you say after that as biased and untrustworthy. Too much, too soon in the pitch.

Simply start off by saying that Windows 10 EOL is coming October 14. Simple. Factual. Accurate. Potentially educational. Ask " Did you know that a new computer running Windows 11 is not the only option? Installing KDE Plasma and Linux on your current computer may be a better choice." Honestly, it should be about as long as I have written here and then get into the benefits.

The emphasis should be on selling Plasma and Linux, not on bashing Windows. That said, the "what you will miss" section does raise good points that should be much earlier in the pitch. Switching means "no ads", "no registrations", "no subscriptions", more control over updates and app choices, less spyware, and fewer viruses. Again, you do not have to directly slam Windows, just emphasize that these are benefits that Linux / Plasma user enjoy. I would not say "what you will miss". I would say "what will you get".

I think it is not only ok but important to be honest that switching will take some effort. Highlight that, no matter what you use your computer for, there are apps available for KDE and Linux to do what you need. In many cases, they are the same apps you use already. However, it will also be common that the Windows apps you use today are not available and you will need to use something new. You do not have to hide from that. But do not make it sound so scary or even inevitable. The last person that I switched to Linux used Thunderbird and Firefox as their two most used applications. Most of the rest of what they did (other than printing) is web based. For them, the switch was not about using new applications at all. A better approach may be a sister site asking what software they use now and identifying alternatives so they can self-assess how difficult a transition might be. If this is done, it should be a in a resources or next steps section at the end. Do not link them away from the pitch.

Absolutely say that many Windows games run on Linux via SteamOS and Proton. Gamers are a big demographic.

It is at this point in the presentation that I would emphasize more strongly that staying on Windows 10 is not really viable longer term. People will have to switch, even if it is to Windows 11. Do you you want to switch your operating system or your computer? Get back to that excellent tagline. I think this question hits harder after you have done some convincing that KDE / Linux might work for them. There are benefits to moving to Linux. You cannot avoid the pain of leaving Windows 10. If you are going to go through a disruption, now is the time to try an alternative. And with that thought, really drive home that the economic side of the equation. On Linux, nobody will force you to pay for software unless you want to. On Linux, nobody will force you to buy a new computer unless you want to. Time to say no to Microsoft and take control of your computer. You cannot send this strong message until you have made people "feel" why they would want to.

The "for the technically minded" should be near the end. I think it is fine to mention it. Perhaps the spin should be that you will never outgrow Linux as even very technical users will find all they need. In fact, most of the technology industry and "the cloud" are driven by Linux already. It could be spun less as "Linux is really complicated" and more "those in the know have already made the switch". Then emphasize again that it is friendly enough for everyone. And then maybe finish off with direction on how to get started and where to get help.

Overall though, great to see the Linux community trying to take advantage of this opportunity. The message will reach some people. Even the Windows magazine article slamming the KDE initiative is marketing that will educate more Windows users that there even is another alternative. Great stuff.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I believe making kde more compatible with nvidia would attract more people over.

[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

I love the blunt title of "... for Windows 10 Exiles", though I wonder if it will rub people the right or wrong way when reading it.

Now, don’t get me wrong, but all the hype around the so-called “apocalyptic” October 14 feels a little overblown.

I agree somewhat - the date itself is not that big of a deal, as it's just a date that Microsoft has set in order to have a spesific time to keep as a reference for when they have their last support push for Windows 10:

Windows 10 will reach the end of support on October 14, 2025. At this point technical assistance, feature updates and security updates will no longer be provided.

This doesn't mean that it will immediately be defunct or a serious security risk. But from this point on, the more time that passes, the higher is the likelyhood of security holes being found (and used), that will not be patched.

Windows 11 has proven itself to have - a - lot - of - anti-features. Being forced to choose between having to deal with those, or change the entire system which you've grown so very used to, can be a rather difficult decision for many. KDE trying to ease the transition I think is appreciated by many who find themselves stuck in this choice. Or at least to give Linux a try.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I wonder if some distro couldn't give a plug-and-play experience for people who don't want the extra security of having to use root and who don't want extra customization.

Just wall off the sensitive areas and mimic the experience of Windows, but with newer, open software.

[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd say Linux Mint, ZorinOS, and Manjaro Linux are all viable options for Windows users who want an easy transition. Although I don't think any distro will ever be considered a "plug-and-play" experience. There are varying degrees of user-friendliness, but if one wants user-friendliness like not having to do root/sudo actions even once, I think one might be better off with MacOS..? Though from what I've heard, the main reason Windows users are looking towards Linux and not MacOS is exactly because of the ability to customize more than just the wallpaper (and also the entire boycott US movement).

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I went to Linux because it was free and available. I used Linux Mint 22.1 Ubuntu and I didn't find it easy.

I think it would be helpful to have a central resource with docs and forums tied in to an AI, so you could type in the problem and get an answer without having to resort to search engines - which are getting worse and worse.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Search engines are getting worse, in large part because of AI...

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

I agree that AI is ruining search engines (although they were already very bad because they were tweaked for people who paid to be first in results), but they actually can be useful in a situation like this, restricted to a very narrow data set to learn.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think people are more likely to give up the security of not having constant admin access if they could get the same software they do now.

As I said in the wall of text above, going "oh, by the way, all your software won't work, but you will find alternatives" is a massive dealbreaker. It's one thing to bring people over to Linux, but trying to do that AND transition people to a full open source environment is a crazy overreach. A Linux distro focused on being Windows-like by offering closed software out of the box and better options for a click-and-play Windows compatibility layer would be way more appealing to many. You can work on their open source bona fides once they are inside the ecosystem.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How do you propose to do that?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Which part?

For closed source repositories of software that is currently available it's just a matter of having them included by default and actively prompting them on app managers as opposed to defaulting to hiding anything that isn't open source by default. Different distros come closer or further from this in the first place.

I imagine if you were going to go out of your way a bit further you'd restructure some of your splash pages and manager layouts to promote those based on popularity out of the gate.

There's an argument for a next step to be pre-packaging windows apps that can work under Wine directly in a package manager, but that's a bigger project and I genuinely don't think Wine is ready for that yet. Linux probably needs a better translation layer that works more reliably and comprehensively before that's an option. But hey, somebody should get on all of that, too.

[–] FancyLad@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Isn't this possible with an atomic distro?

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

How exactly do they plan on getting this message to the people who need to see it most? It's not like Windows has KDE installed, and your average PC user isn't checking out the latest KDE news. So how are they going to see it?

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

The ad writes itself: NO ONEDRIVE.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago

Ten years ago, an employer gave me a Windows desktop and I did my earnest to make it my work laptop. I think I gave up when I realized the OS didn't allow me to use custom hotkeys and I "needed" a tool for it that will be running, capturing my keystrokes ;).

KDE is fantastic, not as lean as other desktops, but very stable and feels as premium as a MacOS equivalent, but way more customizable. It has the same pitfalls as Gnome, with some kwin scripts, widgets and extensions jeopardizing your stability and becoming memory hungry hippos, but also being harder to spot than their equivalent in Sway or others. But IMO it lacks the issues I faced with Gnome with each upgrade (I miss a stable PaperWM).