this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
421 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31674 readers
4777 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_trash_man@lemmy.world 17 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Watch these cost the same as standard seats, and the cost of standard seats go up

“You’re still a premium subscriber and have full access to our premium plan, but some of our options have changed.”

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, that may actually be more comfortable for me than trying to fold my legs into the tiny rows they have now.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 11 points 1 hour ago

I am super torn here because pre-back-surgery me looks at these and says "the NERVE of these fuckers" and post-back-surgery me is like "Well that WOULD be nice yes"

[–] nroth@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Why don't they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you'd save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 minutes ago

The serious non-joke answer is the same as the one for these standing seats: emergency exit speed. When an airplane crash lands you have like less than 2 minutes to get everyone out before the huge inferno happens and roasts people. So for standing seats that pack even more people into an airplane, they have to prove that they can still get everyone out before the deadline. For laying-down seats they would have to prove the same thing.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So we'll have them stand for hours instead?

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

The next step is to add a treadmill under everyone.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats?

Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

But it's all shit regardless. Boeing can barely even make planes that don't fall apart on the runway. The American airline industry's fleet is increasingly defunct. The FAA is gutted. Airports are falling into disrepare due to mismanagement. You'll be lucky to get any kind of air travel in another decade.

[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 0 points 23 minutes ago

!remindme 10 years

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

Wouldn't the same group have trouble standing for an entire flight?

If only there was some sort of halfway point between lying down and standing up, something which would be easier to than lying down, but wouldn't be as physically demanding as standing up.

Oh well.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like something we'll have to pay extra for. Better not have a disability.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hmm..

Well that's one thing I can't really complain about in Finland, access to physically disabled people. Its honestly pretty great, it's been in the infra-design and all design mentality for decades.

Anywhere there is public access, you'll probably also find disabled access.

Like just today, I felt a little bit proud, as I spotted an outhouse built to specifications allowing wheelchair access.

We aren't the utopia people seem to think we are, but if you're in a wheelchair, you'll still get access to nice nature paths on which to be depressed on. So that's nice.

[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 9 points 4 hours ago

The FAA's goal of zero air disasters will feel like a luxury in the future.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, since this is a shit post, why don't they wrap the passengers like a piece of luggage and store them on a shelf? Save so much room.. Just give them diapers! /S

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

An additional $25 Diaper Convenience Fee has been automatically added to your total.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Solution: bring a cheap plastic chair as part of your luggage

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

And if the plane fails, jump out of the plane with the chair and sit down/stand up as you're about to hit the ground.

You won't receive any fall damage during the animation.

(Make sure to check patch notes, this is a 2020 update exploit)

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 hours ago

Honestly I didn't even realize until now how good the cropping is on lemmy compared to redd*t. holy shit the number of memes that came from screenshots of twitter screenshotted on insta screenshotted on whatever the fuck but this one was profile.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 23 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The lengths the US will go to to avoid building high-speed rail.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 44 points 7 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 5 hours ago

Because of course it's Ryanair.

Oh, you want a seat? That's an extra £50. Each. Both ways. Go fuck yourselves.

The EU needs to regulate the fuck out of that shitbag company.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 26 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's a capitalism thing.

Extract as much value as possible. Deliver as little value to your customers as possible. Treat them as second layer of product.

Human needs are not the goal.

This isn’tcurrently anAmerican thing like the other person suggested though

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Yep, nobody ever tried to exploit their fellow humans until capitalism was adopted in the 18th century. The other economic systems that existed parallel to capitalism were also exploitation-free.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The point isn't that capitalism is worse, but that it isn't any better. Despite all the fancy clothes and powdered wigs there is still a class oppressing another class except now the oppressors enjoy far fewer violent deaths.

At least a king had the decency to die several hundred feet behind the poor fucking levies in the same muck as them.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

I never suggested otherwise. However capitalism's core motivator is exploitation.

It is in no way wrong to suggest we move away from such a model, or criticize such a model.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ryanair has no plans to introduce them. (sorry for the metro link).

Also Ireland kind of gets a pass they don't have a rail link to anywhere. A Dublin-Holyhead tunnel would definitely be a good idea.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The UK can barely get high speed rail going to Birmingham where they've already got tracks. The rest of HS2 got cancelled.

I don't see how the same thing under the sea would ever get done.

Plus trains here are more expensive than planes for no reason whatsoever other than greed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The rest of HS2 got cancelled.

Practically as an act of economic sabotage. British people hate their country and are actively trying to destroy it from within

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 4 hours ago

Any non-car related spending is a "war on motorists".

Seemingly half the country think that millionaire man-of-the-people Nigel Farage will be the one to lead us to the sunlit uplands, and the only position he's never flip-flopped on is bringing back smoking in pubs.

We are doomed.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago

I was going to add a jab at the Brits but then thought "nah, they're going to do that themselves, much more effective that way".

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I'm 6'6". Standing only seats would be preferable to me.

[–] TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm 5'5" and I just know my legs would dangle like a child on their first roller coaster.

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

5'4" here. Yeah, I wouldn't be able to reach the floor and would hang there like a rag doll. 🤣

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, crouching like a gremlin under the hand luggage chutes? Fuck that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 48 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How people can look at (mostly) state owned rail vs private airlines and still think the free market benefits the average person is one of life's big mysteries to me.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

I mean, Trump won the vote, and Brexit won the vote... Something tells me it's as simple as most people are fucking stupid.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 7 hours ago

It sounds quiet ridiculous, but I also had some flights that were so short (~50 min) that it almost took more time to seat everybody. Anyway, I would love to read those safety reports. Not only is sitting better on impact, but also cramping more people in the same machine, means more people (which trend to not comprehend the idea of leaving their luggage behind) share the exit routes.

load more comments
view more: next ›