Honestly at this point the judge should rule against them for being idiots
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
701 points (99.4% liked)
News
29500 readers
3046 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"The court finds you contemptible."
Putting aside the fact that musk is an asshole, the value of $100 to him is probably less than what 1 cent is worth to most other people, and I can imagine that if most people owed someone 1c, they would probably never get around to paying it.
It's a different world for the ultra rich, and even more so for the ultra ultra ultra ultra richest.
He can pay them back in burning cybertrucks.
No. Fucking. Shit.
Musk meant $100 credit, towards the purchase of a cybertruck. 🫤
Or a brand new, top of the line toy Yoda!
Maybe it was supposed to be 100 doll hairs... common mistake.
It only makes sense that you could buy a presidency in an uber capitalistic country.
I am not surprised at all
Yeah no shit.
Paying them would be illegal
Conning them isn’t.
Well, it's still illegal. Just with a considerably smaller penalty
He can't afford it
Paying people to vote a certain way should be one of the worst crimes in a democracy punishable by the harshest of punishments
It usually is. In a democracy anyway
In Murica..?!
ai could never make this
Bleh.
Why do you think that?
😥Bro, we are so close to artificial general intelligence, it will be just like JARVIS from Iron Man, and will crack really funny jokes while being a personal assistant to you. All you need bro is to let it ruin your politics, your arts, your human connections, and your environment. Bro, it'll be so smart it'll undo all the environmental and political harm the moment it starts existing. Bro, it'll take us to fucking Mars.
ai can't generate anything that is not averaged dogshit made by grinding every political cartoon to pixels and compressing it to paste. it categorically can't generate caricatures, for example. it also shows a degree of creativity and familiarity with literature unlikely in average propmptfan. and also text is legible
I can tell from some of the pixels...
Screwed over by the world's richest man?
Yeah, well so was the rest of the nation...
Who wants to tell them?
@admiralpatrick@lemmy.world The spam ban on the OP of this post seems heavyhanded (at least from the outside). Can you review or offer additional context?
E: this seems to (maybe) be the reason for anyone else wondering https://lemmy.world/post/29949200/17158534
I can DM the mod who issued it.
Additional context: https://lemmy.world/comment/17158534
TL;DR is the account has a history of leaving spam-like posts in its wake. Instead of deleting posts, they edit the title and URL to gibberish and leave them up. The comment I linked above is me asking OP to not do that (at least in this community), so they have been warned. Looks like they left two more gibberish posts early this morning which is likely what triggered the other mod to issue the community ban.
Per the comment I linked, I'm assuming that is why OP has been banned from so many other communities.
See:
- Community Bans: https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModBanFromCommunity&userId=13927378
- Removed Posts: https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModRemovePost&userId=13927378
Edit: Typo
That makes total sense. Tyvm for the transparency <3.
I volunteer as tribute!
HEY CHUMPS! Y'ALL GOT PLAYED BY A CONMAN! MUSK AND TRUMP DON'T GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT ANY OF YOU! MAYBE THINK ABOUT THAT FOR ANY FUTURE ELECTIONS, HUH?
RICH PEOPLE ARE NOT GENEROUS. IF THEY WERE GENEROUS THEY WOULDN'T BE RICH PEOPLE. THEY ARE THE OPPOSITE OF GENEROUS.
Isn't it illegal to pay for voting and to be paid? Or, is it just illegal to pay for votes?
Not if you also pay all the people who would enforce that law
Isn’t it illegal to ...
No one gives a shit anymore
Isn’t it illegal to …
The average American hasn't yet realized the benefits, or consequences, of our newly instituted unfettered lawlessness.
My understanding is that it potentially isn't illegal, because you weren't being paid to vote explicitly, and weren't being paid to vote for a specific candidate for sure, but you were (supposed to be) paid to sign an agreement that you would vote, and I think it also said you support a certain candidate but I'm not totally sure on that.
Basically, he was paying for people to say they'd vote (maybe for a certain candidate) but legally that wasn't actually required, so possibly barely skirts the law if a judge is being very generous to him.
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
100 dollars? yall sold the usa for 100 dollars?
Buddy. That is like 5 BJs.
It’s one democracy, Michael, what could it cost? 100 dollars?
If you don't pay it's actually 0 dollars!
And didn't even get the money up front.
load more comments
(2 replies)
When one of the two biggest black holes for cash on the entire planet promise to make things better for you if you just do this thing they want to happen, you shouldn't be surprised if at the end of the process you have less money and they have more money. Elon Musk is expert at making money move from you to him. So is Jeff Besos. It doesn't have to be direct from you to them via a payment, just know that they are sucking up the money, and if you ever, ever, ever do something they want you to do, you can be 100% sure it's because after they're done, you have less money and they have more.
The guy whose companies don't pay debts didn't pay debts? Who could have seen this coming?!
Edit: changed from singular to plural.
load more comments
(2 replies)
That crowd loves grifters and con-men. That Trump crowd acts like peasants just to get close to the proximity of wealth.
No one has ever become a billionaire by paying people what they’re owed
view more: next ›