this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
91 points (97.9% liked)

No Lawns

2642 readers
161 users here now

What is No Lawns?

A community devoted to alternatives to monoculture lawns, with an emphasis on native plants and conservation. Rain gardens, xeriscaping, strolling gardens, native plants, and much more! (from official Reddit r/NoLawns)

Have questions or don't know where to begin?

Where can you find the official No Lawns socials?

Rules

Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 27 minutes ago

Couldn’t we just sprinkle native seeds and let whatever grows grow. It’s not like it’ll grow to be a hazard anyways the tram will limit the growth to be very short simply by consistently passing and “cutting”.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

The first image looks like recently cut grass.
Maybe Belgian people can tell use if Liège's grassy tracks are cut every week but it doesn't look so as it is a beautiful green and dense in herbs. It would probably be full of flowers in a few weeks.

The second image is already full of flowers and diverse plants. It is a bit hard to identified as the focus is not on them but the grasses are tall enough to make fruits which is very healthy compared to manicured lawn and common clover's flowers are everywhere. I saw also a kind of white flower I can't recognised.

I don't see any issue with the example you show and I have not seen issue with the ones I saw in real life. Maybe you can talk more of your experience to help us understand the limitation you see.

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] stray@pawb.social 14 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think it makes sense to criticize grass in areas where it's a native ground-cover plant. Green lawns are bad in North America because they require an absurd amount of resources to stay alive. European lawns stay green under heavy layers of snow and are never watered.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Still, (entirely) green lawns in Europe are a result of cutting the lawn all the time. If we give it more time to grow between each time it's cut it'll grow into a colourful oasis of all kinds of flowers that are both beautiful and allow insects to thrive. It doesn't always make sense - if you want to lay down on the grass for a nap you'd rather have an even surface of grass and relatively fewer insects - but there's too many green lawns around here as well.

My family started transforming the lawn in my childhood home into a field of flowers a few years ago, and the transformation is fantastic. Every year there are new flowers popping up. When cutting the lawn it helps to leave the cuttings a couple of days or so to dry, so that the seeds have a chance to fall off and enter the soil.

The tram track in the bottom picture looks like it's doing good. A bunch clovers, and they probably won't discourage other wildflowers as/if they appear. There seems to be some white flowers there already.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Can be, we make sure we replant grass with mixtures that contain multiple species. There are those who go full "golf grass", we call them snobs here.

[–] ManixT@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

North America has all climates; not just desert. There are millions of hectares of land that require no effort to grow grass. Lots more than Europe.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

If you mean: grow more meadow plants, fewer lawn grasses, yes.

If you mean food, no.

And, no, farming bees isn't a good idea. We need wild pollinators most of all, and domestic bees compete with those and spread diseases.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 40 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Clover typically takes less water to survive than turf grasses and puts out lovely flowers that are pollinator friendly for a pretty good portion of the year. The kind of clover that grows in my area (Tennessee, USA) is nearly evergreen too, starting earlier in the spring and staying green later than turf grasses.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 11 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Yet, we don't want the pollinators to get smashed by the trams. Thus, flowering plants probably aren't a good idea.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 58 minutes ago

If we run trams over grass for long enough, perhaps eventually a plant will evolve which uses the motion of a tram to spread its pollen.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, I'm not an expert but I think most trams move slow enough that they aren't going to take out pollinators. They won't crush them on the flowers, only risk would be when flying in the air. A decent aerodynamic deflector of some kind would probably help. The modern equivalent of a cattle guard on an old steam train.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Makes sense.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

FYI, grasses are flowering plants too. We just typically mow turfgrasses before they grow tall enough to produce them, and even when they do, the flowers themselves are typically very small.

For example, bermudagrass flowers:


Honestly, I doubt that it'd much of a problem to use things with bigger flowers -- bees and such can probably get out of the way of a tram.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Of course, grasses are neither a fern nor moss. I was thinking of flowering plants that do attract pollinators, not those that make use of wind for pollination.

[–] seaplant@slrpnk.net 9 points 7 hours ago

Ooh that sounds nice!

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Can't put anything too fancy, since it's ultimately being bonked by a vehicle.

Lawns and grass are dumb, but still better than asphalt, cement or fill gravel. There's at least some life, even if it's unhealthy monoculture.

Needs to be something that won't damage the vehicle if it grows too much or interferes with the tracks.

A lot of places have a low ground cover type plant that would probably work well. One that also has some little flowers would be fun, add some color and be nice.

My notion would be random wildflowers and ground cover, and then just let what happens happen. Cut it back as needed for safety and maintenance requirements, and otherwise it doesn't really matter what grows there, as long as it isn't "a tree".

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 3 hours ago

A tree wouldn't even be able to grow, because the ground under the grass is super thin. There's a thick layer of concrete under that grass.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean that second picture looks pretty great. As long as it's a local grass species and is allowed to grow wildflowers then I don't really see an issue.

[–] seaplant@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 hours ago

That's a helpful nuance! At first I just saw them both as grass = lame

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

the bones of billionaires?

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Composting helps, sure.

[–] seaplant@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 hours ago

sounds like the sort of compost we need to nourish a better society

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Skinny solar panels, feeding back into the grid?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

Unlike solar roadways, this actually makes sense. Lots of tram systems also use DC, eliminating the need for inverters. And yes, panels are so cheap it's not too bad that they're horizontal; vandalism is a greater issue.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Endemic / native ground covers will better support local fauna and insects.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Local plants. Specifically something that feeds a local endangered species. Pollinators are the most obvious choice. Planting wild flowers for bees would bee nice.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Would the bees be injured by passing trams?

[–] Pofski@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Trams on average do not drive too fast. I would imagine that bees would easily be able to evade them or even be bumped out of the way.

[–] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 hours ago

I'd guess less than by not having any flowers at all. Where I live, most (non metro) trams drive pretty slow, like 30km/h in long straight parts, so unless they get between the wheels and the rails I doubt anything would really hurt the bees.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

I remember watching rollercoaster tycoon videos about a decade ago where players could pack their parks, then have a roller coaster just plunge off the tracks taking out most of the visitors. That's how I picture a bunch of pollinators drawn to a tram track.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

I imagine a very swampy tram track would attract a lot of mosquitoes to urban spaces, so chances are it wouldn't be very popular. But I like the idea.

[–] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago