this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
1397 points (98.8% liked)

me_irl

6015 readers
1979 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OmnipresentDonut123@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

When you're 20 minutes into an argument on reddit and suddenly get permanently IP banned for saying something that didn't even break rules

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The net is far more ban happy than it used to, it's gotten to the point that I don't feel safe using Steam Forums.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Wish that was me more often

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Reddit? Nah that's literally every platform.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

If I was the owner of Reddit, i would 100% save in-progress comments, and keep the unsent ones in the database for my enjoyment.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Wasn't that implemented once? Or was that a browser feature? I swear at some point what you typed into input comment boxes was saved.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If I was the owner of Reddit, i would 100% save in-progress comments, and [...]

sell the data to AI companies

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 34 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

"I didn't have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote a long one."

i wanna say Mark Twain said that, but I'm not 100%

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

I thought it was Victor Hugo but apparently it was Blaise Pascal

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

It's a similar story with editing videos. Paring a video back is where most of the time goes.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think it was Darude Sandstorm.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Maybe it was Austin Mini?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 17 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

If you had made the effort to remix the meme by changing it to say lemmy, I'd've upvoted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 143 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

It hits for me when I'm typing it out and I can already read the braindead response they're going to type and I don't want to spend another 2 paragraphs preempting the obvious response and I definitely don't want to wait a few hours/days to explain why they're still wrong.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 70 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Me when I realize the person I'm commenting to is from hexbear.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 31 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's because Reddit sells anger quite well. Their bots and human instigators work overtime to get you to comment like that. I think all of us Reddit refugees have fallen for this shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 26 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If someone is an obvious tankie or far-right troll, just be like "Lol loser" and never elaborate further.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Or you can call out bad faith and veiled extremist views in a few words. It only takes a little more effort.

Sometimes that is infinitely better for people reading (who are not in the know) and it still gives the person with the controversial views something to latch on to that inadvertently exposes their beliefs and bad faith further if they keep engaging.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There is no way to reason sense into someone who has reasoned themselves into their mindset. No evidence or proof can change their mind for them.

Any reply on confirms the beliefs of anyone who reads it, regardless of their side on the matter.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

There is no way to reason sense into someone who has reasoned themselves into their mindset. No evidence or proof can change their mind for them.

Those are limiting beliefs and I firmly disagree. You can't change someone's mind, but they can. We can succinctly give them the information to do so on their own terms.

Any reply on confirms the beliefs of anyone who reads it, regardless of their side on the matter.

Not everybody is operating from a fixed set of beliefs and a narrow perception.

Humanity has a lot of curiosity, if it's all laid out bare, we can at least stop impressionable people from getting herded into rabbit holes that they don't understand and being propagandized.

Calling people names and spreading hate only perpetuates the tribalism that you see coloring reality.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

True, but a considerable amount of the population has the causes that they will put themself on the cross for, regardless of how wrong it may be.

See flat-earth.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

And they should be free to do so. We can still lay the facts bare - so when they are ready to face reality, they are available to them.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Even if their opinion is overall damaging to the opposite mindset?

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

If a mindset or perspective is vulnerable to the delusions and other breaks from reality of others, perhaps we need to work on expressing ourselves with clarity and confidence - and gather facts for people to consume.

Trust me, in a neutral arena, the truth will always resonate with the majority of people. I'd say the fediverse has pockets that are fairly neutral compared to other discussion boards/websites.

Delusion usually starts from a place of persecution, real or perceived gaslighting, and paranoia and concern. We can address the gaslighting if it does exist, and ease their concern.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

True, the problem is no different than the horse being dehydrated and not knowing it is thirsty. Doesn't matter if we show the water is there if the horse won't/can't perceive that it is thirsty because it has tied their identity and worldview to being thirsty.

We can only offer our opinion until the last straw compromises their viewpoint in a manner that finds the chink.

Unfortunately the emotionally fueled current meta is to brow beat fecklessly.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm seeing a bit of a shift in others' attitudes. I'm usually everywhere discussion is found online. Things just seem to have gotten more real to people and that seems to be what is prompting this. Plus the propaganda from the usual places just isn't hitting the same.

Most people cope with reality by escaping or distracting themselves - e.g. into various hobbies, interests, habits. It doesn't really help that media and games just kinda suck anymore and hobbies/habits are more expensive than ever.

I'm doing my best to soften the hearts of those who engage in feckless browbeating, as you aptly described it. Usually behind the veneer of hate and hard feelings is a very sensitive and vulnerable person who is seeking rather harmless things (like validation, approval, camaraderie, community). Of course, that's not always the case - sometimes people are caught up into hate and bad faith without even realizing it, and some absolutely do intend on spreading hate and operating in bad faith.

Regardless, I just do my best to clear things up for everyone and it seems to help. I don't delude myself into thinking my impact is very large, but I do intend on helping others in a general sense - and I know I have helped many.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

'Know your place, trash. Fucking robot.'

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 65 points 18 hours ago (12 children)

Here's a tip for how I've improved my social media experience greatly:

Stick to a rule of 1 comment and no further replies.

Strangers online are not going to be convinced by your point of view and there is nothing to gain from getting into a back and forth conversation. Unless it's a particularly positive or productive conversation about a particular interest you share....there's nothing to gain from arguing online and lots of potential mental damage you risk.

My stance is: when arguing on lemmy, you're not only trying to convince the other one. You're also trying to convince future readers. Even if the other one is an asshole, people see that and that has an effect.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I know you're playfully joking, but I second their opinion. I was basically on a crusade against misinformation in 2020 and 2021 against COVID deniers and election truthers. Nobody ever changes their mind. Nobody ever admits their wrong. No matter how respectful and accommodating you are, no matter what sources you find, it's just not worth it. Give one response if you feel inclined, but don't reply to the reply. Don't waste your time. Don't get pointlessly stressed.

People do change their minds sometimes, but it's never done in the moment and if you press them too hard on their beliefs they'll double down.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You don’t primarily reply to convince the person you reply to, it’s about the other readers.

[–] theshoeshiner@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

On top of that, I don't think most people realize how that level of dehumanization affects the conversation as a whole. We are not replying to people, we are replying to walls of text, abstract concepts, hypotheses, and we treat one another as such. It's why anonymous internet discussions so quickly devolve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 19 points 17 hours ago

Proposal for an exception: Where the comments/discussion revolve around something non-controversial with people who are OK with partaking in a conversation without needing to win it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 12 points 14 hours ago

deleted by user

[–] f314@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I am slightly concerned that I recognized the anime source from that one frame 😅 To be fair it is a fantastic series! Check out Paranoia Agent if you can 🍿

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 13 hours ago

Actually it's a keyboard shortcut to close the browser tab.

[–] railcar@midwest.social 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I bookmark subreddits and read them without logging in. Every time I feel the urge, I've got a hurdle to cross before I can type anything. Then it's immediately a "fuck it" moment and move on

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The Reddit interface is so fucking obnoxious when you're not logged in, I've just given up on the community entirely. Days of casually browsing have been ruined by the constant gating and engagement baiting and GUI hell they've injected into the site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 29 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Yeah arguing on the Internet is a waste of time which is why I don't do it much anymore unless I feel very strongly that someone's reply to my comment needs to be disputed.

Most of the time I make my point then don't bother responding to any replies. It's much more pleasant to respond when it's you're not arguing, just discussing something interesting.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›