this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
350 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

69815 readers
3149 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imperor@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (14 children)

This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me. There are so few real applications and the hardware requirements are insane so it's not something that will get widely adapted anyway. Sure in a decade or so it might have matured enough to have shed all these issues, but AR/VR feels like a really out of touch thing to prusue, especially if you look at the garbage ideas they have on how to use it - virtual meetings??

I get movies and games on these, possibly even some recording and porn, but these are not their B2B wet dreams anyway.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I’d really just like some glasses that simulate multiple monitors without needing special software. That’s all I want

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Yep, and that seems to be the route Apple was going. Screens you can place anywhere in your visual field.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] osef897@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

overlaying ads on literally everything could be the end goal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me.

  • It's a mobile phone you don't need to hold.

  • It's a mobile phone that never goes in your pocket.

  • It's a mobile phone that is always on and has access to everything you see and hear.

[–] kayazere@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sounds like a fucking nightmare, but a wet dream to Big Tech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s a bummer than those sound like bad things simply because corporate abuse is always a forgone conclusion. If your data was truly private and always entirely under your control and ONLY your control, those would be really attractive features.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 49 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Being able to keep a screen in front of the user at all times is the goal. This is one step closer to replacing the eyes Cyberpunk style.

This is why Siri and Apple Intelligence is so important to Apple, getting away an actual keyboard will make this more addicting. They can decide what to show you before you even start thinking about it!

Corporations would love being able to not only know where you are at all times, but now they have the tech to see exactly what you see!

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (12 children)

it’s not that complicated, the goal is to create another hit product that everyone wants like the ipod and iphone.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's a gag in Futurama about ads being displayed in your dreams. If that were possible they'd be doing that, but right now they're settling for just the waking hours.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only Siri could understand what I say

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlantPowerPhysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Next courageous Apple creation:

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Such a prescient episode.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good, I wanna see Apple flop just like Meta's VR nonsense did.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why do you people hate VR?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is Quest a flop? Or are you talking about something else?

Bot quest and ray band products are huge success dominating their respective markets.

I really wish people were more serious about these markets so it can be done well from the get got rather than starting to be fixed and regulated 2 decades later.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Having borrowed a quest 3 last week I’ve almost pulled trigger on buying one.

The only thing holding me back is.. it’s Meta.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think the fundamental problem with the AR glasses is something that can't be overcome.

I think its easy to see the utility to owning a pair of glasses that look good and provide real time information as desired for what you are looking at or hearing.

HOWEVER, I think very few people will want the product these co.panies will make. This will be a method to throw ads literally in front of your eyeballs. Enshitification is too big of a thing now and so any new product is tainted by the expectation it will rapidly turn to garbage at a high price to you.

Also, while we may think we can be trusted, we dont trust anyone else having all that info, I dont like the obvious privacy implications that these can present. Filming with them is also terrifying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago

And I care zero about ever purchasing those things.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’d be interested to hear from the youngest generation (15-20 YO) to hear if they care about this at all.

I’m approaching 50 years old and had been an early adopter most of my adult life. Growing up from the 1980s through 2000s, there was a near-mainstream narrative that we were living in a unique era of emerging technologies. It was exciting and we were anxious for anything new.

It seems to me that nothing is really new and there is nothing exciting, if not interesting, about technology today.

I’ve actually been stripping down the technology from my life as it’s become too distracting to get things done and has prevented personal growth and the formation of memories. For one example, I recently subscribed to a print magazine because I prefer a tangible object that I can associate with in and of itself (and choose to own and collect).

Looking at analog trends like vinyl records and film photography and cassette tapes, it seems like people are at least trying to incorporate tangible objects into a modern lifestyle. Then you have the trend of the dumb phones which indicate people are becoming more aware of the detriments caused by an always connected lifestyle. Thankfully, some car manufacturers are returning buttons to their cars in response to owner feedback about everything being a touch screen.

I mean, I’m not a multi-trillion dollar organization with different departments studying the feasibility of future products but I do wonder if something like AR glasses are already more of our past than our future.

I think there’s a more than reasonable desire for a device to help you through your day - especially in foreign countries. But do you think you want that to be glasses or something else?

Lastly, this reminds me of the prediction from Michio Kaku in Physics of the Future about augmented reality contact lenses. Should we at least accept AR glasses as first step towards contact lenses? Do you think society would accept these 20-40 years in the future?

[–] Khuda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

i am somewhere around it, and i think the best part about AR glasses is we don't have to buy monitors,

when i used to be 15 couple of years ago i also fantacized about the asthetics of 80's after watching many 80's animation films, there was just something about them ,although i wasn't alive during that period.

i am personally more excited about fdvr, i hope we have it in 25 years, but i don't think we will

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Guess what Tim Apple? No one wants them just like no one wanted your stupid headset that I honestly can't even remember what it was called.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well I do want this, augmented/virtual reality is exactly the kind of shit I dreamt about as a kid during the 90's, and having a huge screen available anywhere I go is pretty fucking cool.

But yeah, I used a VR headset exactly once for like 5 minutes, and there's no way in hell I'd buy one from meta or apple. If Valve releases good XR/AR glasses I might consider it.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sounds cool in theory, but modern tech companies aren't going to make what you wanted as a kid. Whatever they make will be heavily enshittified.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I love VR and have multiple devices but the platforms are still really bad. There's so much jank amplified by all of the greed by Apple and Meta. For example on Apple's VR device you can't have multiple users - they were so greedy that they thought they'd sell multiple devices per household.

Can't wait for Valves Deckard or whatever next VR project they're working on. Steamdeck is everything a handheld should be and if they can finally nail that in VR it would be awesome.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of things at Apple that I, as the paying customer, would rather Cook care more about than AR/VR boondoggles.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's the smartwatch bullshit all over again.

1 in 10 have one

9 in 10 don't care and never did

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wdym lol smartwatches are everywhere now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maki@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, AR is pretty awesome to be fair.

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Never from big stock market corpos. Fuck their "vision".

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Google already made AR glasses and they failed. Not because the product was bad, but because AR is stupid and has such a niche case that it's practically worthless.

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This is just another attempt to capture even more control over our attention - advertising everywhere. Of course Apple wants it

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Gudl@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Classic Tim Apple.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like it's a CEO's job to care about all aspects of the company he is supposed to lead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would love to have a good pair of ar glasses to play games on my Steam Deck with. Connect a controller, and not have to hold up the heavy Deck itself.

But given Apple's propensity for walled gardens and lock-in, and Meta putting manipulative spyware into everything they make, these hypothetical glasses won't be coming from either of those companies.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I've got prosaspoagnosia, I just want them to display little name tags under the faces of people that I know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Khuda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Does anyone even want AR glasses? I don't.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

yes, not from apple though. That's a guarantee they would be useless for a tinkerer

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Boringgggg, do another trick apple.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›