this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
6 points (80.0% liked)

Would You Rather

380 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to c/WouldYouRather, where we present you with the toughest, most ridiculous choices you never knew you had to make! Would you rather have a third arm that's only useful for picking your nose, or be able to talk to animals but only if they're wearing hats? Yeah, it's that kind of vibe. Come for the absurdity, stay because you've clearly got nothing better to do with your life.

Rules:

  1. Follow dbzer0 rules.
  2. Start posts off with "WYR:"

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It depends. Do I trust the place?

Vanilla is pretty much always good. It's hard to go wrong with vanilla. Chocolate is much more variable. A good chocolate is better than a good vanilla, but a bad chocolate is much worse.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

that's a good point - but to counter, there is always those cheap artificial vanilla alternatives that taste off, vanilla can be butchered too!

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vanilla. I even put vanilla in my hot chocolates.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

was about to say, I think chocolate is improved by vanilla - they're often paired 🤎

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmmm, this is actually harder than it seems

Like, I'm a chocolate fiend. It's my one true vice left to me after stopping tobacco use.

But damn, vanilla is amazing. It's such a delightful flavor in so many things that people forget how rare it used to be, how precious.

For me, I couldn't give up chocolate for it, but damn I would miss it. Pretty much every baked good I really love has vanilla in it. But you can't really just have vanilla by itself, as in the way you can a chocolate bar. It's always in something rather than being the main thing. I mean you could just eat vanilla beans, but it wouldn't be the same

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

vanilla is amazing; I guess it's contextual for me. Vanilla ice cream or chocolate ice cream? I will choose vanilla hands down (preferably vanilla bean).

But if I had to snap fingers and either chocolate or vanilla disappears from the world? I dunno, I would have a breakdown - I don't think I could do it.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Oh heck, back before bryers decided to screw things up, their natural vanilla was my default ice cream, even over stuff like hagen daz chocolate. I still prefer a good mistrial natural vanilla with the actual bean in it over any other ice cream, but I miss the heck out of the breyers.

I think I'd it was a finger snap thing, I'd break my thumbs instead.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I prefer vanilla for ice cream and coffee, but chocolate for anything else.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Chocolate.

I'm sure the couple of baked goods I make that involve vanilla can use something else were it to cease existing. Almond extract would also be pretty good, I think.

[–] Lacanoodle 2 points 1 week ago

This might just be the toughest question of my life. Instinctively I wanted to say vanilla. But I genuinely cannot make a decision, this is very difficult.

If it was for society and which crop I could protect, I'd choose chocolate.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It depends on what it is.

Cake or ice cream? Chocolate.

Pudding or a beverage? Vanilla.

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 points 1 week ago