this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
709 points (99.0% liked)

News

22896 readers
4222 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Prosecutors say the former president’s message on Truth Social raises specter he might use evidence to target witnesses.

In a court filing just before 10 p.m. Friday, Senior Assistant Special Counsels Molly Gaston and Thomas Windom alerted the judge in Trump’s latest criminal case — U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan — to a combative post Trump sent earlier in the day.

“If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” Trump wrote in all caps Friday afternoon on Truth Social, which is run by a media company he co-owns.

The prosecutors said Trump’s post raised concerns that he might improperly share evidence in the case on his social media account and they urged that he be ordered to keep any evidence prosecutors turn over to his defense team from public view.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gramathy@lemmy.world 287 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trump never having been jailed for contempt is baffling

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 145 points 1 year ago

I think you misspelled infuriating.

[–] supercheesecake@aussie.zone 117 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Different rules for the rich and powerful.

What baffles me is his supporters all rage against stuff like this but don’t recognise their orange idol sits at the top of the pile.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not against it in principle. They want to be the one doing it. It's others winning they object to.

They're not against it in principle

Exactly, they have no principles just wins and losses against the other side where everything is a zero sum game

[–] wheres_my_pinata@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wouldn’t that be considered witness tampering or something like that?

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Add it to the list. Neither he nor his voters care about that stuff

[–] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (7 children)

When he said he could shoot a man in cold blood in the middle of times Square, he wasn't kidding. He's literally raped children for God's sake.

[–] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As often as he projects... i'm kind of wondering if he's had people murdered... like the time he accused Joe Scarborough of murdering his intern... i remember thinking holy shit... start searching trump properties for buried bodies.... i mean shit he buried his ex wife on a golf course.

[–] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean he wouldnt do it himself. He'd hire a hitman. Which then he'd short the hitman on paying him. Its the trump way to never pay the ending fees on a contract. I dont think he himself has had a direct hand with murder. But I 100% believe he's a child rapist. He talked fondly of jeffrey epstein, and went to his parties, and commented himself on the young girls at the parties.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Just ask "Katie Johnson" the pseudonym of the little girl who was raped by trump and epstein when she was just 13 years old.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s a convicted rapist. No conjecture or hyperbole. A convicted rapist.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Does the justice?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

No, worse its witness intimidation. Essentially tampering "you should x" intimidation "I'll do x" one effects current witnesses while the other implies they'll go after current and potential witnesses.

[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

That only counts when you don't have money.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought this was directed at the judge?

Edit: Given the context it seems aimed at the witnesses.

[–] sci@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Possibly, but it depends on how the judge interprets it.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is this statement open to any other interpretation than as a direct threat.

[–] sci@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

idk, i'm not a lawyer

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The prosecutors said Trump’s post raised concerns that he might improperly share evidence in the case on his social media account and they urged that he be ordered to keep any evidence prosecutors turn over to his defense team from public view.

He probably gives a flying fuck about this. He is already in deep shit creek, and any chance to rally his fans is more important than just another half inch of extra mud he is sticking in. Because if those morons vote him back into the white house, the first thing will be to pardon himself from all the crimes he did, and retaliate against the juridical system with prejudice.

[–] wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

He is already in deep shit creek

It's either:

He is in deep shit

or:

He is up shit creek (without a paddle)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he is convicted surely he can't run. I thought you had to have a clean criminal record to run for office?

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nope:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/17/can-convicted-felon-run-for-president/

The constitutional qualifications for being president are being a natural-born U.S. citizen, a resident for at least 14 years and over the age of 35. A person can be disqualified by conviction in a Senate impeachment trial, but a criminal conviction does not affect eligibility.

[–] whataboutshutup@discuss.online 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trump wrote in all caps Friday afternoon

What a dumbass. Can't really read his tweets without hearing him losing it or having a stroke.

on Truth Social, which is run by a media company he co-owns.

Does it still work? What a surprise. Unpleasant one.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't mind him having a stroke.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Not like they have to do much, it's just mastodon with federation turned off

[–] CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is incapable of not saying or doing stupid shit.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feral genius presents as saying stupid shit.

The guy is a monster but somehow slips the snare over and over again.

I would love to lose the bet, but my money is on time, nullification, or pardon ensuring that he isn’t particularly inconvenienced by the four indictments.

[–] harbo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am 100% convinced that he thinks pushing the envelope as far as possible thought out this will stall the process, cause conflict, and make the court look like it has a vendetta against him. He’s going to do this most with NY, DC, and GA case, and not as much in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida case because his entire argument in those other cases is that the courts themselves are trying to silence him. And who knows. It might work. It’s worked for him well in the past.

His only way out of this is to stall, stall, stall, and win the election by making himself look like the victim to his core supporters and few dumb fuck centrists in swing states.

And it’s working. You’ll be seeing influential people who were critical of trump come out and say “I hate trump but it’s obvious he’s being attacked simply because they hate him.” These people will be paid millions by his campaign. People like Joe Rogan etc. will “gradually” become full on trump supporters with the narrative they they still don’t like trump but hate what the DOJ is doing more and paint trump as a future political prisoner.

The only way out of this is a huge effort to get people to vote. They’re counting on apathy and muddy waters.

[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Throwing an ex president in jail would bring a myriad of problems, but at some point America should bite the bullet, own its mistake, and fucking do it.

But not throwing him in jail sends a pretty terrible message to his contemporaries, causing more problems.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

For his first dumb tweet he'll get the protective order. If he does it again I could see a judge definitely thinking of putting him behind bars. Whether it happens or not depends on whether he wants to double down. I'm hoping he does.

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or when you see idiots post things like this. If you want to complain that's fine but at least look at the facts what you're comparing. Apparently Trump supporters are incapable of that. Yes Hilary questioned the election results and even Democrats objected to the electoral count of the certification of some of the rust belt states Trump won. But they didn't try to get Joe Biden to send the results back to Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Obama wasn't calling up state officials to overturn the results. Democrats didn't get an angry mob to storm the capitol.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also, while I don't doubt that there were more than enough people voting for Trump anyway, considering the fact that he has attempted to fiddle with the results before, what is the guarantee that he hasn't before that?

I'm not saying Hillary was right (it doesn't matter in hindsight anyway), but at least now I understand her doubts a bit more.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

With all the projections of him losing, Hillary winning popular vote by 3 million, I've thought since then something shady happened. Then in 2020 with all the bullshit he spewed, where did he get that idea from? Everything these clowns do is projection. The only fraud found was fraud they committed. How much more did they do that didn't get looked into?

At this point, whenever someone from the GOP accuses anyone from the left of something, I say both get immediately investigated. We all know what the results would be and right would plug their ears and walk away yelling Hillary's emails and Hunter's laptop.

[–] vd1n@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He's so Mob.

He got so fucked over by Roger stone who is so Mob.

America's dead.

The mob never went away they just became politicians and learned how to hide in plain site. Like every other us "achievement" JFK breaking down the mob was all for image to push more false security to a country of blissfully ignorant consumers.

Puts on a bigger tinfoil hat...

Now the Kennedy's are under mob control and next in line as the mobs puppet is Robert.

They gotta work carefully to make it look like these poor mailable maga types are making a movement and take any criminal blame, while they (the mafia) move deeper into the government.

[–] dunning_cougar@waveform.social -5 points 1 year ago

What’s he going to do to a federal judge’, groip in the street outside the judge’s house? That’s against the law.