this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
523 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

7817 readers
3086 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kruddman@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

This is not an equivalent argument. We can build spaces for humans that don't suck the soul out of you. I've lived in crummy apartments horded by neighbors, and as long as I have the choice I never will again.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I mean the US has much less soulless housing, and we have enough housing for everyone. The issue is we have a society that doesn't care to house the homeless.

The issues with the brutalist blocs built in Eastern Europe is usually more about the soulessness and drearineess of the architecture.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

People on the streets is far more soulless than gray concrete housing. Especially because concrete can at least be painted over to make it look better.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I think you misunderstood my point. That concrete block design came about due to a push for efficency and quickly rebuilding post WWII. So it was either house more people quickly or nice looking houses.

The US hasn't really ever had to make that decision. We have enough houses as is for the homeless. The design of our homes/apartment buildings is not our limiting factor, it's our policies and approach to housing and the homeless.

[–] knemesis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

But look how colorful the tents are!

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

What's a house go for now in Sanfrancisco?

Given 2/3 of it is zoned for single family homes I'd assume its still not cheap.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I mean, the people shitting on "commie blocks" usually don't mind that homeless people are barely considered human by the law... so they'd probably be on board with the idea of sending the police to slash all these tents

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The commie blocks also had smart city planning, like you had a supermarket and everything else in walking range, and no through traffic. I do think they could be designed and build a bit nicer with modern technology. Especially higher ceilings and thicker walls. And then put those blocks out into nature or agricultural land and connect them via high speed rail or a self driving shuttle bus.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

No city folks want to live in agri land due to smell and sounds from agri works. I do agree with more green areas. Stockholm gets a lot of flak for its miljonprojekt but there are quite a lot of trees and green areas within walking distance from most places

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 23 hours ago

Kinda works for representing evil, repulsive people though.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Affordable housing doesnt need to be expensive. You can have pretty nice midrises for very cheap. Design like 20 different models, all of em in 5 different colours, thats 100 different styles of apartment buildings and you just dont put two of the same next to eachother and problem solved. Mass produced, colourful, nice, cheap, housing.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People shitting on commie blocks, but there's millions who would love to have a roof and plumbing.

The more densely we live, the more land that can be left wild/rewilded. We're not entitled to a tick tacky vinyl wrapped house surrounded by lawns and pavement. Our earth is fucked and getting more so by the day. It's a problem that can only be solved by us all living smaller lives.

I always tell people to look to Hong Kong for housing practices. They don't do everything right, but they're definitely on the right track.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I demand my own little box on a hillside!

[–] kaprap@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

Support state owned apartments!

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 78 points 2 days ago (35 children)

As someone from a post-soviet country, and had to live in one of those.. there's plenty of reasons to shit on them.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Look, the post clearly states "No real reason". You, you gotta learn to read.

(I lived in one of these and it was absolute hell)

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›