this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
17 points (84.0% liked)

politics

23089 readers
3866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Last time around Trump needed the adoration (and money) of these Wall St types. This time, though, his main source of income is crypto grifting. His job as President is merely a side gig for pocket money.

He thinks tanking the US economy is a power move, because he thinks his crypto will hold steady and he will make even more money in dollars. I don't think "enough" is a word in his vocabulary. He always wants more, and always at the expense of someone else. I think he enjoys it more when he thinks he is making money by taking it from someone else.

[–] thanksforallthefish 7 points 1 week ago

German president Paul von Hindenburg thought that he could "control" Hitler, and that he wouldn't do the extreme things he promised in his election speeches, and thus brokered his move into the Chancellor's position in a minority govt. I think we all know how that turned out.

Almost a century later the barons of Wall Street have just had the same "oh shit" moment the German conservatives had in 1933

A more interesting story would be on what Wall Street got right.

Nothing. Saved you a click.