cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/60365167
Case 1
Original post

Moderator carrotcypher says "removed for paywall." When asked about which rule this breaks, receives no response. The post is then locked.

Case 2
Original post
Same as the first, except this time there is no paywall - the link is to a freely accessible advocate.com page.

It is censored with no explanation.
Case 3
Original post

Same as Case 2, moderators censor the post and leave no explanation.
Case 4
Original post
This one is finally given a removal reason: a rule that does not exist in the sidebar, and seems to have nothing to do with the post ("Your post has been removed for being too specific to a company or single product.")
But in a censored comment, the OP of the post says they received a different removal reason:

This time, other people notice the censorship and the nonsensical nature of the official removal reason.
Since this removal, there has been no further post of this news in r/privacy. Sources tell me the moderators refuse to explain their decision.